Channel
@cryptreasures
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,454subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002185340317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptreasures |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptreasures |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @block44ain/8428 Jun 2026, 03:04 UTC | @cryptreasures/1058 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC | 1.00 | 5 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @block44ain | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @block44ain (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @block44ain. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 2,454 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 2,461 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,468 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 2,468 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 6.06% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😕 MRKT ВЗЛОМАЛИ! Только что школьник-мошенник выкупил багом абсолютно все Plush Pepe на маркете — 18 штук, а затем начал передавать и продавать на Portals 🎁Покупали даже самые обычные Plush Pepe по 15 000💎- 20 000💎 На данный момент MRKT временно ушёл на технический перерыв. Portals остановил выводы. Школяр наколотил $625к и успел их вывести
😁3
Подросток в Москве хотел обменять мамины деньги на криптовалюту, но его ограбили. 17-летний парень получил от матери 1,5 млн рублей от продажи машины и поехал в «Москва-Сити» для обмена. В обменнике ему отказали, и на первом этаже его с друзьями встретили трое незнакомцев. Парень попытался уехать на такси, но злоумышленники вытолкали его из машины, а затем в подземном переходе вырвали пакет с деньгами. Двоих подозрев…
🤬3
⏺️ USDC доминирует: июньский оборот стабильных монет вырос на 125% год к году Новый виток институционального принятия цифровых активов вывел объем торгов стейблкоинами на рекордный уровень. Из $1,79 трлн общего июньского оборота более двух третей пришлось на токен USDC, который показал результат в $1,21 трлн. Лидер прошлых периодов USDT обеспечил $576 млрд трансграничных и внутренних транзакций. Молодой стейблкоин…
🔥2
⚠️Время повышенной волатильности на этой неделе Понедельник: • 17:00 — ISM услуги PMI Среда: • 21:00 — Протокол заседания FOMC Четверг: • 15:30 — Заявления на пособие по безработице 🗓Время по UTC+3. 🔖Значение новостей: (Раскрывается по нажатию) • ISM Услуги PMI — показатель активности в секторе услуг, отражающий состояние экономики. Положительные результаты могут повысить доверие к традиционным активам, а слабые…
🔥2
⏺️ Аналитики JPMorgan снизили краткосрочный прогноз по золоту, но верят в его рост в 2027 году Временное затишье перед новым ралли. Несмотря на резкое снижение прогноза на конец 2026 года до $4500, JPMorgan сохраняет оптимистичный долгосрочный взгляд. В банке уверены, что уже в 2027 году восходящий тренд возобновится, а главным драйвером долгосрочного роста стоимости драгметалла останется стабильный и высокий спрос…
❤1
🤔Перелив капитала из BTC в золото? Аналитик Питер Брандт заявил о намерении продать часть своих BTC и вложиться в золото💰. Он принял это решение, основываясь на графике XAU/BTC.
🔥2
⏺️Финтех-гигант Revolut установил дедлайн для вывода и конвертации USDT для европейцев Клиенты Revolut в ЕС получили предупреждение о необходимости вывести или продать свои запасы USDT. Полный отказ от токена завершится к осени: все оставшиеся на счетах монеты будут автоматически конвертированы в фиатную валюту по текущему рыночному курсу. Причиной столь радикального шага стало несоответствие эмитента Tether новым…
🔥2
⏺️ Пророк кризиса 2008 года объявил войну хайпу вокруг искусственного интеллекта Майкл Бьюрри разглядел признаки масштабного пузыря в котировках технологических компаний. Его фонд начал шортить ключевых бенефициаров ИИ-гонки, включая Nvidia. Бьюрри подчеркивает, что реальные финансовые отчеты и темпы роста чипмейкеров не успевают за завышенными ожиданиями толпы, а значит, рынок ждет жесткое отрезвление.
🔥2
⏺ Дональд Трамп делегировал управление своими криптоактивами детям Семейный бизнес и геополитика. Трамп открыто заявил, что не вникает в отчетность о собственных заработках на криптовалюте, оставив эти вопросы сыновьям. Фокус внимания лидера Белого дома смещен на глобальные цели: он уверен, что доминирование США в секторах ИИ и майнинга является критически важным для победы в экономическом противостоянии с Пекином.
🤷♂2
⏺️ Замена клавиатуры на пальце: стартап выпустил кольцо-трекпад OASIS 1 за $289 Инженеры из Флориды объединили голосовой ввод и жестовое управление в одном миниатюрном корпусе. OASIS 1 крепится на пальце и позволяет не только переводить шепот в печатные предложения, но и моментально вносить правки с помощью сенсорной панели. Разработчики уже открыли предзаказы с прицелом на предпраздничные отгрузки в конце года.
👍1
⏺️ Спутниковый интернет от Amazon начнет работать до конца года благодаря группировке из 396 аппаратов Гонка за глобальное покрытие переходит в активную фазу. Amazon завершила стартовый этап запусков, обеспечив минимально необходимую инфраструктуру для запуска бета-тестирования связи. В будущем компания планирует резко нарастить темпы вывода аппаратов с помощью новых тяжелых ракет-носителей, чтобы довести общую чис…
🔥1
😈Джеймс Уинн снова под ударом Трейдер Джеймс Уинн в седьмой раз за неделю столкнулся с частичной ликвидацией своей 50x шорт-позиции на S&P 500. Однако он не сдается и продолжает держать шорт на сумму $1,4 млн. Новая цена ликвидации составляет $7 536.
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptreasures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 139,812 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто-Визионер” (@cryptreasures), 2,454 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptreasures.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.