Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Крипта это просто | Арбитраж трафика google

Channel

Крипта это просто | Арбитраж трафика google

@cryptoyoutu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,916subscribers

+1,285 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002127626333
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoyoutu
DescriptionЧат - https://t.me/cryptoisea По вопросам сотрудничества - @drevatiy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoyoutu

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6318,5177,5746 August 2026 — 6,631 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,631 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,764 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,957 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,399 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,517 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,199 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,169 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,138 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,139 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,127 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,116 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,099 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,090 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,084 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,056 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,031 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,010 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,016 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,993 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,966 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,946 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,939 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,948 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,945 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,931 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,918 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,916 subscribers7,9166 August 20269 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 95 days, net +1,285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,348–8,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 11:117,916-2
6 Nov 2026, 06:277,918-13
3 Nov 2026, 04:457,931-14
31 Oct 2026, 03:197,945-3
28 Oct 2026, 12:597,948+9
25 Oct 2026, 21:217,939-7
23 Oct 2026, 04:577,946-20
20 Oct 2026, 13:547,966-27
17 Oct 2026, 20:017,993-23
15 Oct 2026, 04:118,016+6
11 Oct 2026, 23:028,010-21
5 Oct 2026, 11:588,031-25
27 Sept 2026, 14:228,056-28
17 Sept 2026, 20:178,084-6
14 Sept 2026, 02:218,090-9
10 Sept 2026, 11:398,099-17
4 Sept 2026, 23:598,116-11
1 Sept 2026, 00:258,127-12
29 Aug 2026, 01:298,139+1
26 Aug 2026, 11:038,138first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 7,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held58 (28 May 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total45,190
Reactions total487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
266
Videos
16
Links
337

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
46s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,278 reactions across 52 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁57945.3%
👍31324.5%
❤‍🔥836.49%
💯705.48%
👀634.93%
🗿534.15%
🤮513.99%
🐳251.96%
🤔211.64%
🤷‍♂110.861%
🙊70.548%
👾20.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC960 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

вся суть вайбкодинга - только начнешь что то пилить для себя, поймаешь вдохновение и тебе сразу палки в колеса и это gpt, еще в клауде же балуюсь - там раза в 3 больше уходит, по крайней мере по оплатам так кажется

💯8❤‍🔥2🤷‍♂1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,800 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как говорил мой бывший начальничек «мы работаем с людьми» поэтому нет ничего удивительного что в индустрии откаты и взятки просто существуют

💯17🐳1

5 Nov 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,410 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @vtraff

Кастати сегодня ахуел , не думал что так можно было. Оказывается можно заплатить пару копеек менеджеру агентских кабинетов , и он сольет вам доступы к кабинетам , скинет скрины и связки клиентов которые хорошо спендят.

🐳15🗿6

4 Nov 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,860 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

кто не видел - то билы порезали на гугле

🗿16🤮2

2 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,820 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

не люблю эту тему настраивать, но как хорошо что появился искусственный интеллект, просто за 10 минут все что надо мне сделал

💯9

1 Nov 2026, 05:41 UTC≈1,820 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @aff_ownerPhoto

Все кто едет на сигму, еще пару недель назад это обсудили. А в паблик, так никто и не написал, кроме 01к. Думайте.

👍10🐳2👀1💯1

1 Nov 2026, 05:41 UTC≈1,850 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026

на aff world в Будапеште тоже ходили, та камон - очевидно что такая индустрия, с таким оборотом и возможностями не останется без внимания гораздо смешнее как на этих конфах бегают додики и кричат на каждом углу как льют крипту)

🤔9🤷‍♂2💯1😁1

31 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,910 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Пару лет назад взял в привычку дарить жене цветы, раньше старался раз в 2 недели. Понятно что не всегда получалось раз в 2, но стабильно раз в месяц - маст хев. Так и жена довольная, та и самому нравится чтоб запах цветов + вайбец мимимишности. Но самое главное в этой теме - когда поцапались то это лучший ключик к решению вопросов)) В общем цветы женщине - универсальная тема и с поводом и без повода, всегда захо…

👍39🤮15😁4💯2

30 Oct 2026, 05:01 UTC≈1,910 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Уже все высказались с своим экспертным мнением, но пока не видел выводов - что это все следствие развития аи. Очевидно, что, когда ВВП Северной Кореи частично держится на хакерах, такие взломы будут происходить постоянно. Думаю, исполнителям даже пару мешков риса в качестве премии выдадут. А аи - как раз отличная возможность закрыть технологические пробелы. Не смотря на то, что на этой неделе китайская биржа зафикс…

👍12

30 Oct 2026, 04:48 UTC≈1,700 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

А вот не надо было банить меня

😁8

29 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,810 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026

По многочисленным просьбам - вернул рыгачки в канал! Немного, кстати, оживили чатик https://t.me/cryptoisea Я очень гордился тем, что скурпулезно Кикал любые проявления коммерции и не держал «мертвых душ» Докикался что в чате месяцами тишина 🤣 но ничего, зато - там 100% реальные люди, которые оживают при кодовом слове «тимлид»

🤮33👍6❤‍🔥4😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @cryptoyoutu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @cryptoyoutu as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

жиза и арбитраж
@aff_owner · 45,638
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
PIRATE CPA // Channel
@piratecpa · 29,378
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
Traffic Cardinal | Арбитраж трафика
@trafficcardinal · 20,456
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 October 2026
CPA HUNTER | Вакансии арбитража трафика
@hr_affiliate · 35,590
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
Арбитраж. Все вакансии в одном месте. LENKEP
@Arbitrazh_vakansii_rabota · 30,119
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крипта это просто | Арбитраж трафика google” (@cryptoyoutu), 7,916 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoyoutu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.