Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,838–2,933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 04:39
2,849
-9
28 Oct 2026, 23:55
2,858
-10
25 Oct 2026, 13:27
2,868
-11
22 Oct 2026, 18:27
2,879
-7
19 Oct 2026, 19:10
2,886
-8
16 Oct 2026, 12:10
2,894
-8
13 Oct 2026, 18:50
2,902
-12
8 Oct 2026, 13:40
2,914
-8
4 Oct 2026, 17:24
2,922
no change
4 Oct 2026, 17:22
2,922
no change
4 Oct 2026, 16:47
2,922
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
14
63.6%
🔥
4
18.2%
❤
1
4.55%
👎
1
4.55%
👏
1
4.55%
😢
1
4.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2024 to 7 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😐 𝘽𝙇𝙐𝙈 𝙏𝘼𝙎𝙆 𝘼𝙉𝙎𝙒𝙀𝙍𝙎 😐
💵How to Memecoin
Ans : MemeBlum
💵Premarket Trading
Ans: WOWBLUM
💵Forks Explained
Ans: GO GET
💵How to analyze crypto
Ans: VALUE
💵Secure your Crypto
Ans: BEST PROJECT EVER
💵Navigating Crypto
Ans: HEYBLUM
💵What are Telegram Mini Apps
Ans: CRYPTOBLUM
💵Say No to Rug Pull
Ans: SUPERBLUM
💵What are Telegram Mini apps
Ans: CRYPTOSMART
💵Liquidity Pools Guide
Ans: BLUMERSSS
💵$2,5M+#DOGS airdrop
…
Hey everyone! It has come to my attention that some of you might be seeing an incorrect Blum Points balance, but there's no need to worry. This is just a display glitch, and your points are completely safe. They are already working on resolving the issue.
Rocky Rabbit Airdrop will be on Sept 22🔥
The 3 tasks given must be completed to get eligibility for Airdrop🗣️
Just 5 days left 😁
It is like Hamster but only less Users. So if you want to try this Airdrop Join Here
https://t.me/rocky_rabbit_bot/play?startapp=frId572171886
#RockyRabbit 572117886
🗣️Open Blum & go to "earn" section
Now you can claim 𝟱𝟰𝟬 𝘽𝙡𝙪𝙢 𝙋𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙨 daily 🔥
If you open Blum daily and spend 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝟮 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘀, you can easily get more than $50 from their Airdrop just like Dogs.🙌
Be ready for 𝙒-𝘾𝙊𝙄𝙉 𝘼𝙞𝙧𝙙𝙧𝙤𝙥🔥
They have mentioned it their twitter
In my opinion stake those coins whatever you have🙌
💫If you still not joined.. Join here: https://t.me/wcoin_tapbot?start=NTcyMTcxODg2
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cryptowayns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mission Govt Jobs @missiongovtjobs0 · 18,685 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptowayn's Airdrop” (@cryptowayns), 2,849 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowayns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.