10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,843–11,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 21:54
10,863
-17
28 Aug 2026, 18:33
10,880
-11
27 Aug 2026, 19:59
10,891
-5
26 Aug 2026, 21:15
10,896
-16
25 Aug 2026, 18:45
10,912
-15
24 Aug 2026, 19:37
10,927
-32
23 Aug 2026, 03:55
10,959
-21
21 Aug 2026, 15:14
10,980
-19
20 Aug 2026, 11:35
10,999
no change
20 Aug 2026, 05:31
10,999
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
5
71.4%
❤
1
14.3%
🐳
1
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoviproyalx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 October 2025 to 21 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Sunday recap ☀️
The trading week is now over.
It’s time to step back, review the week, and enjoy the results achieved.
Weekends are made to rest, reset the mindset, and prepare mentally for the next trading sessions.
Tomorrow, we come back focused, disciplined, and ready for a new trading week.
🔥 NEW: PNC has launched Bitcoin trading for its private banking clients through a partnership with Coinbase, allowing them to buy $BTC directly within their investment accounts.
𝗭𝗘𝗖/𝗨𝗦𝗗 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 🟢
#ZEC is showing classic bullish reversal signs after touching the demand zone and completing a falling wedge.
Holding above the support box could drive price toward $588.99 – $678.84 – $762.07 as momentum strengthens.
#ZEC #CRYPTO
𝗕𝗧𝗖/𝗨𝗦𝗗𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗦𝗜𝗦 🚀
#Bitcoin is sliding into a major higher-timeframe demand zone where price has historically formed strong reversals. Candles are beginning to wick into the zone, signalling seller exhaustion as buyers quietly step in.
With BTC now hovering above this key block, even a small reversal structure could mark the end of the correction and trigger a strong recovery bounce from this level.
#btc
𝗗𝗔𝗦𝗛/𝗨𝗦𝗗𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗦𝗜𝗦 🚀
𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁: #DASH is pressing against the descending trendline, with price eyeing the $95 level as it builds pressure for a move.
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁: A confirmed breakout above $95 could open the door to strong bullish momentum and continuation upward.
#bullish #breakout
𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗞/𝗨𝗦𝗗𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗬𝗦𝗜𝗦 🚀
𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁: #LINK is supported at the confluence of the 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗭𝗼𝗻𝗲 and 𝗘𝗠𝗔 𝟭𝟬𝟬 on the weekly timeframe, marking over 700 days of 𝗿𝗲-𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁: A 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗭𝗼𝗻𝗲 appears inevitable, with upside targets at $31.65 and $46.00.
#bullish #accumulation
𝗖𝗧𝗞/𝗨𝗦𝗗𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗬𝗦𝗜𝗦 🚀
#CTK is breaking out of a falling wedge, showing early bullish reversal momentum as buyers step in from the 0.296–0.299 zone. Structure is shifting upward with improving volume support.
A confirmed breakout can drive price toward higher liquidity levels, while the setup remains valid above the 0.2825 invalidation zone.
#ctk #update
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptoviproyalx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Growth @AirdropGrowth · 71,673 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Trading Royal” (@cryptoviproyalx), 10,863 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoviproyalx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.