#FIO/USDT broke out falling wedge. Up only🚀✌️

Channel
Crypto traders
@cryptotrader_100
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
24subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001559629025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptotrader_100 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 21 January 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptotrader_100 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 24 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 25 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2022 to 7 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#BTC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS It is moving in a descending triangle and currently above good support zone where point of control and EMA 55 is also acting as a support. MACD is showing weak bearish momentum while RSI is in the normal zone. Here if it continues with the same bullish momentum then we will see an upward move in BTC while if it breaks down then we will see drop in BTC price.
BTC tested 42,000$ but fail !!!! Maybe back test $38,000-39,000
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS It breakout channel resistance and we have seen a very good volume in the whole bullish move but still for more strong confirmation we've to wait for a 2D candle close above the resistance trendline which will confirm that bullish move.
Download and join this ☝️ To mine pi coin
I am sending you 1π! Pi is a new digital currency developed by Stanford PhDs, with over 25 million members worldwide. To claim your Pi, follow this link https://minepi.com/Anniphogat and use my username (Anniphogat) as your invitation code.
#BTC massive news ✌️✌️
#ETH/USDT ANALYSIS It is moving in an ascending triangle and currently rejecting from the resistance. We've to wait for a sustain breakout/breakdown to confirm it's next move.
#ATOM testnets coming 👈
#ADA/USDT ANALYSIS It is consolidating in a symmetrical triangle followed by a downtrend which has a more possibility of breakdown, MACD is showing bearish momentum, while RSI is in the oversold region. We've to wait for a sustain breakout/breakdown which will confirm it's next trajectory.
It may possible that #BTC will dump again. 😔😔🔴🔴
🤩1
#DATA/BTC at its weakly support level Ready for upward move 📈📈🚀🚀🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptotrader_100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto traders” (@cryptotrader_100), 24 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotrader_100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.