Channel photo updated

Channel
.
@cryptosharkg1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37,564subscribers
-192 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001752306011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptosharkg1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptosharkg1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 37,564 | -29 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 37,593 | -30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 37,623 | -70 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 37,693 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 37,730 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 37,756 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,220
- Videos
- ≈329
- Links
- ≈2,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 55.9% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 41.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptosharkg1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «.»
всем пока
❤2
Пошел второй день без казино, природа настолько очистилась что по центру города начали плавать дельфины,утки снова начитают летать, а все владельцы казино снова вернулись в коммуналки
❤4👍1
И все хорошо, даже не умер
День без казино
Игра , в которую я играл в периоды без казино, сколько тысяч часов тут наиграно) Даже донатил несколько раз, вроде ничего интересного, а на самом деле самый кайф
Помогает ли демо счет с лудоманией? Лично для меня это может быть решением если это в первый 1-2 дня после затяжной серии. Но по итогу видя сильную отдачу хочется играть еще сильнее. Как вы считаете, есть ли малейший смысл играть на демо вместо своих?
❤3
План максимально простой Зарабатывать, половину отдавать сразу в долги, вторую половину на жизнь Привычных гивов в этом канале уже не будет, только полностью фри конкурсы Если кому-то надо акк изикеша где через 50 дней начислят 100к , то могу продать за 70к(фулл перевяжете акк на все свое), можно и через гаранта Отписать можете в комменты под этот пост
🤣6
Проснулся, первая цель сейчас это раздать фулл все долги, общая сумма 8-9к долларов что не сильно много учитывая общий проигрыш, да и много раз мог полностью его закрыть, но каждый раз думал похуй потом отдам.
🤣6
Я просто взял и подарил целое состояние тем кого даже не знаю, просто из-за своей жадности. Как говорил один человек)) Богат не тот у кого денег много, а тот кому их хватает(вроде правильно написал) Суть в том что сколько бы денег у меня не было, мне всегда было мало, хотя каждый раз я мог уйти и отдыхать несколько лет, вместо этого дарил деньги владельцам казино. Но при этом существуют люди с доходом в дясятки раз н…
❤4🤣2
Может мне надо начать пить антидепрессанты? У меня депрессия уже почти 2 года, причем в очень глубокой форме
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptosharkg1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 391,058 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.” (@cryptosharkg1), 37,564 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosharkg1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.