Channel
@cryptoprof93
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,534subscribers
-2,128 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002159884312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoprof93 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoprof93 |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 1,534 | -57 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 1,591 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 1,602 | -115 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 1,717 | -36 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 1,753 | -68 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:50 | 1,821 | -63 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 1,884 | -74 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 1,958 | -210 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 2,168 | -353 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 2,521 | -751 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 3,272 | -390 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 3,662 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The creators of $HERO250 will be drawing 15 names from those who attend. The first 5 we draw will receive 1 SOL. The next 10 will receive 25,000 $HERO250 coins. To qualify: 1. Attend the Space 2. Post about ACW / HERO250 after 3. Tag us American Coin Works. Veteran-owned. 9/11 week. First responders. Tuesday’s Promise. They'll be talking about the new website, the mission, and $HERO250. Date/time: Saturday, Sep…
❤1
Here what I just Found 😮 GoldenCat Giving 0.1 #BTC to user's 🔥 Diamond Level people's earning 0.1 BTC Share ♻️ Never Saw any project like this 🚀 Here How you can Participate 🧩 🌐 Follow X Account @GoldenCatLot ⛓️💥 🤖 Join Telegram App 🔥 { t.co/qjV1wjMO35 } Use My invite Code [M0BB6Q00] 🔄 Sign Up on the app 🚀 👾 Buy minimum 1 Pixel 🚀 Share Proof And Like RT post's
We separately recognize the most active referrals. On September 13, an additional bonus of 5000 TRX will be raffled among them. To take part, you simply need to: — have at least 1 pixel on your balance — have at least one referral who registered via your link and also has 1 or more pixels on their balance The app automatically identifies active referrals. The conditions are simple, and participation is open. TG :…
RT this post and register in the app — and you’re in. Every participant gets a chance to receive 200 TRX added to their game deposit completely free. Winners will be selected randomly. Results will be announced on Saturday, September 12. That’s it. Simple. Link : x.com/GoldenCatLot/status/2096886196982935665
Collect 10 Bronze, 5 Silver or 3 Gold pixels → unlock Diamond, the strongest pool. 0.1 BTC is hidden on the field right now. Only for the boldest players. Go hunt. X : x.com/GoldenCatLot
Most L1s give you a token. Then you still open Chrome. Lumen shipped the access layer: ✓ Native browser ✓ On-chain lumen:// domains ✓ IPFS in-app ✓ Cosmos chain live ✓ $LMN IBC’d to Osmosis Emission is simple: 1 LMN / block, halving ~every 4.5 years, hard cap 63,072,000. No endless mint. Swap $LMN: https://app.osmosis.zone/?from=uosmo&to=ibc/88DBE57372690630D2DD9779C247479CE124E777C5D695FA90699F3140CEC59F Web: l…
CLXAI is being developed step by step: establishing the foundation, researching responsible pilot concepts and publishing progress as milestones become real. No artificial targets—just transparent development and reviewable decisions. https://core-logic-x.com X : x.com/CLXAI8
❤1
Meet MOSH: an end-to-end encrypted, serverless messenger built on the Moss peer-to-peer network. It is designed for direct communication without a central message store. Discover the technology and its collaboration with Web : core-logic-x.com X : x.com/CLXAI8
MOSH × CLXAI is a planned use case connecting private, serverless communication with optional CLXAI payments for selected services. The integration is being prepared and is not yet operational. Details will be published before launch. X : x.com/CLXAI8 www.core-logic-x.com #CLXAI #MOSH
CLXAI market access is live through its official CLXAI/USDC pool on Raydium. Independent market data is available through DEX Screener and GeckoTerminal, with routing through Jupiter. Always verify the official mint and pool before interacting. X : x.com/CLXAI8
The CLXAI Community Airdrop is open. Up to 100 eligible wallets may receive 10,000 CLXAI each. The snapshot is scheduled for 29 August 2026 at 16:00 UTC. No payment or token purchase is required. Participation does not guarantee an allocation. X : x.com/CLXAI8
With the Track Record feature, you can see the exact statistics and performance of the whole scanner. We value transparency and real truth over empty promises and inflated lies. This space needs more honesty. 🛡️ Going live soon! 💪 X : x.com/Apex__Base
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptoprof93. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO PROFESSOR 🔍” (@cryptoprof93), 1,534 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoprof93.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.