Let me get this sorted
π15πΏ4π4β€3π2π€―2π«‘1

Channel
@cryptoprodigyz
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,063subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002145067103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoprodigyz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoprodigyz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 2,063 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 2,068 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 2,078 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 2,084 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 2,090 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 2,096 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 2,102 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 2,107 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 2,110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 2,110 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
851 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 311 | 36.5% | |
| β | 174 | 20.4% | |
| π₯ | 95 | 11.2% | |
| π³ | 63 | 7.40% | |
| πΏ | 46 | 5.41% | |
| π | 32 | 3.76% | |
| π | 25 | 2.94% | |
| β‘ | 17 | 2.00% | |
| π€― | 17 | 2.00% | |
| π | 15 | 1.76% | |
| π | 14 | 1.65% | |
| π | 11 | 1.29% | |
| π«‘ | 6 | 0.705% | |
| π | 5 | 0.588% | |
| π | 5 | 0.588% | |
| π | 4 | 0.47% | |
| β | 3 | 0.353% | |
| π₯° | 3 | 0.353% | |
| π | 2 | 0.235% | |
| π’ | 2 | 0.235% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.118% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 851reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Let me get this sorted
π15πΏ4π4β€3π2π€―2π«‘1
Got hacked
π13πΏ3π3π2π2
Stop
π€―9π4π1
Found a generational lowcap. It's quite possibly 1 of the best narratives on chain at the moment. This for sure has that 100x potential. Want to give you guys good entry so I'll share when it makes sense to in the next 72 hours, the OG's in here know that any lowcap I share in here does extremely well since I am ultra selective. Sub 500k coin which I can see steadily cooking to 20/30M in the next 60 days. Time tβ¦
β€46π³12π₯10πΏ6β‘4π€―3π1
Posted without readable text
β18π₯8π5π³3π2β€1π―1πΏ1
$memecoin The lead behind this ran chillguy to 800m, the fundamentals are a very good mix. -bit of crime -good supply control -IRL marketing about to start in 8 countries (onboarding normies) -team have deep pockets and will be able to get big listings if the chance arises It migrated off bonk where it hit 55M in 2 days and the team is the exact same as before but this time they understand itβs important to not ruβ¦
β€21β9β‘5π³5π₯2β1
In an hour I will be sharing a Memecoin I am very confident on to reach 200m valuations. Currently at 12M, this is a play you size & relax in over summer.
β13π³5β€4π4πΏ4
Time for me to help you all. 33 reacts βοΈπ§§π₯’
β€72π₯12β8π8π6πΏ5π₯°3π2
File, posted without a caption
β‘8π₯4π³3π3
Forgot I had a telegram
β11πΏ7β€4π4π³2π2
Life. Those who listen to the advice & thesis's for the projects I share in 2026 will be among the top 0.1% of Crypto traders, I am sure of it. You have no idea how much we are about to win this year, just be ready & relax.
β€32β14π7π³5π3πΏ3π₯2
Next play
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
β16β€9π³4πΏ2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoprodigyz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Next play
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 22 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βThe Dojo | Prodigy βοΈπ§§β (@cryptoprodigyz), 2,063 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoprodigyz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.