🚨BREAKING: Morgan Stanley Expands Deeper into Crypto with Digital Asset Lab Launch ➡ Read More

Channel
Crypto Power - Shilling
@cryptopowerchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,468subscribers
+852 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001144195056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopowerchannel |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopowerchannel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 39,468 | -2,550 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 42,018 | -339 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 42,357 | -782 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 43,139 | -516 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 43,655 | -1,041 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 44,696 | +7,162 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 37,534 | -840 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 38,374 | -424 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:14 | 38,798 | -611 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:33 | 39,409 | -2,441 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 41,850 | -5,646 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 47,496 | -280 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 47,776 | -509 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 48,285 | -547 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 48,832 | +9,418 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 39,414 | +283 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 39,131 | -549 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 39,680 | -437 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 40,117 | -457 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 40,574 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.1%
- avg views ÷ 39,468 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15,400
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (6 March 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 77,180 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 13:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🚨Binance Buys $100M in CRCL Shares Amid Expanded USDC Partnership With Circle ➡ Read More
Revolut Breach: KYC Data and BTC History Stolen Revolut handed over customer passport files and full Bitcoin transaction histories to attackers who spoofed a legitimate government email domain — fooling the company's verification checks entirely. The exposed data includes KYC identity records, and the attackers are now demanding 10,000 BTC. Using a real government domain to craft a fraudulent request is an uncomfor…
🚨Coinbase CEO Says Crypto Gets Regulatory Clarity Even If CLARITY Act Fails Senate Test ➡ Read More
Sberbank Eyes BTC, ETH, and USDT as Loan Collateral Russia's largest bank, state-majority-owned Sberbank, is planning to accept Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT as collateral for loans — expanding an existing digital asset lending pilot as Russia's new crypto market regulations take effect. The catch: final implementation still requires sign-off from the Bank of Russia. Sberbank has also reportedly raised questions abou…
🚨BREAKING: London Stock Exchange Partners with Kraken’s Parent to Tokenize UK Stocks ➡ Read More
🚨Franklin Templeton Taps HashKey to Bring Tokenized US Government Liquidity Fund in Asia ➡ Read More
🔥WILD: You can now watch every Bitcoin payment get delivered like tiny letters, in real time. This website turns the live Bitcoin network into a working post office, with a mail truck leaving every 10 minutes when a block is mined. Over 83,000 letters are in line right now.
🚨Coinbase Secures Abu Dhabi Approval for Tokenized Securities Services ➡ Read More
📉 Crypto social activity has fallen to multi-year lows The number of posts about Bitcoin and Ethereum on X is now at one of its lowest levels in years. The last time sentiment and social engagement were this quiet was just before the 2021 bull market. Historically, periods of low attention have often coincided with market bottoms, when interest fades before the next major move. Of course, history doesn't always re…
Another crypto exchange is shutting down! BitMart has announced it will cease operations, with new registrations and deposits disabled from July 26, while the platform is scheduled to fully shut down on January 31, 2027. Many customers report being unable to withdraw their crypto, citing frozen withdrawals and repeated KYC/AML verification requests that still fail to unlock their funds.
AI agents could become one of the biggest drivers of stablecoin adoption According to a new industry report, AI freelancers, autonomous agents, and micro-businesses could process up to $262 billion annually through stablecoins by 2033. The logic is simple: traditional banks are often too slow, expensive, and inaccessible for autonomous software. AI agents can't open bank accounts, but they can send and receive stab…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @cryptopowerchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Power - Shilling” (@cryptopowerchannel), 39,468 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopowerchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.