11 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈18,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
🚨Coinbase Secures Abu Dhabi Approval for Tokenized Securities Services ➡ Read More
Channel
Crypto Power - Shilling
@cryptopowerchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
44,315subscribers
+5,699 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001144195056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopowerchannel |
| Description | Crypto news and projects investment 🚀 Admin: @CryptoJohn |
| Created | Between 1 July 2016 and 31 January 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopowerchannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 44,315 | -1,005 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 45,320 | +9,789 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 35,531 | -732 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 36,263 | -567 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 36,830 | -660 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 37,490 | -650 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 38,140 | -476 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 38,616 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 38,616 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.3%
- avg views ÷ 44,315 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16,100
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (6 March 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 473
- Videos
- 47
- Links
- 439
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
3 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC≈13,300 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
📉 Crypto social activity has fallen to multi-year lows The number of posts about Bitcoin and Ethereum on X is now at one of its lowest levels in years. The last time sentiment and social engagement were this quiet was just before the 2021 bull market. Historically, periods of low attention have often coincided with market bottoms, when interest fades before the next major move. Of course, history doesn't always re…
28 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈16,100 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
Another crypto exchange is shutting down! BitMart has announced it will cease operations, with new registrations and deposits disabled from July 26, while the platform is scheduled to fully shut down on January 31, 2027. Many customers report being unable to withdraw their crypto, citing frozen withdrawals and repeated KYC/AML verification requests that still fail to unlock their funds.
13 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC≈18,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
AI agents could become one of the biggest drivers of stablecoin adoption According to a new industry report, AI freelancers, autonomous agents, and micro-businesses could process up to $262 billion annually through stablecoins by 2033. The logic is simple: traditional banks are often too slow, expensive, and inaccessible for autonomous software. AI agents can't open bank accounts, but they can send and receive stab…
5 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC≈18,000 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
🤖➡️💰 Is capital rotating from AI to crypto? After a massive rally in AI-related stocks, investors are beginning to take profits. Memory and semiconductor shares have lost momentum, while Bitcoin has rebounded from below $58K to around $62K. AI winners have delivered huge gains this year—SanDisk (+530%) and Micron (+230%)—but recent pullbacks suggest enthusiasm may be cooling. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is showing signs of …
29 Jun 2026, 20:49 UTC≈20,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
Bitcoin is about to close its third consecutive red quarter If nothing changes dramatically in the next two days, June will finish down roughly 18.5%, making it the worst June since 2022, while Q3 would close around -12.3%. This has happened only three times in Bitcoin's history: 2014, 2019, and 2022. And here's the interesting part Every previous instance of three consecutive red quarters was followed by the for…
19 Jun 2026, 22:35 UTC≈16,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
📉A key engine behind Strategy’s Bitcoin buying spree is starting to stall Michael Saylor’s preferred shares, STRC, have been trading below their $100 par value for the entire month, hovering under $92. That may sound minor, but it has major implications for Bitcoin. 👀 STRC has been Strategy’s primary fundraising tool, helping the company acquire over 112,000 BTC—more than 13% of its total holdings. 💰 The problem? …
8 Jun 2026, 22:31 UTC≈14,700 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
AlloX Launches Prime Picks 🎉 AlloX has introduced Prime Picks, a new way to invest in handpicked portfolio bundles on BNB Chain with zero research required. Just pick a bundle and go on-chain in seconds. - Curated portfolio - No research needed - Fully on-chain and non-custodial - Easy entry for both new and experienced users Current bundles include: - Top-Tier - Power Players - DEX Titans And more are coming so…
31 May 2026, 21:53 UTC≈24,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
XRP ETF DEMAND BEATS BTC AND ETH ETFs $XRP ETF outperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum in weekly ETF flows for the third straight week. Despite broader crypto weakness, XRP recorded $15.2 MILLION in new inflows, extending its streak of investor demand
26 May 2026, 16:00 UTC≈16,600 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
HYPE is now trading at an estimated P/E ratio of around 97 For comparison: Average S&P 500 P/E today ≈ 32 Historical S&P 500 average ≈ 20 What does that mean in simple terms? For every $1 of profit generated by Hyperliquid, investors are currently willing to pay about $97 for the HYPE token. That’s an enormous premium — even by crypto standards. The market is basically pricing Hyperliquid not as “another excha…
18 May 2026, 21:19 UTC≈21,500 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
Strategy just bought another 24,869 BTC worth $2.01B at an average price of $80,985 per coin As of May 17, the company now holds a staggering 843,738 BTC acquired for a total of $63.87B, with an average entry price of $75,700. At this point, Michael Saylor isn’t really “buying the dip” anymore. He’s buying entire supply shocks. Strategy now owns so much Bitcoin that every new purchase feels less like a trade and …
13 May 2026, 10:05 UTC≈18,300 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
🇺🇸📈 US inflation jumped to 3.8% — the highest level since September 2023 April CPI rose 0.5%, coming in above expectations (3.7%). Markets are reacting relatively calmly for now: • S&P 500 futures down 0.4% • BTC had already corrected below $81k ahead of the report Two potential red flags for markets: 🔴 inflation accelerating above 4% in May 🔴 the Fed shifting back toward rate hikes if price growth continues A lot…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cryptopowerchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,142,584 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Power - Shilling” (@cryptopowerchannel), 44,315 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopowerchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.