🎁Dogs: Stickers - Emoji 🎁Swag Bags: Stickers - Emoji 🎁Snoop’s Cigars: Stickers - Emoji 🎁Cars: Stickers - Emoji 🎁West Side: Stickers - Emoji

Channel
Cryptopia
@cryptopiaton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
342subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002104063147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopiaton |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopiaton |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 342 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 347 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 348 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 348 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 34.2% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 21.1% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 9 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptopiaton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2025 to 9 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Подарки вышли!
🤌Флипать подарки стало проще с Thermos! Swap Coffee запустили очень полезный агрегатор с поддержкой Tonnel, Portals и MRKT. Он работает без комиссии и даже начисляет кэшбэк за покупки. На самом деле — очень годная штука.
❤1
🚫ФРИМЕН УДАЛИЛ ТВОЙ АККАУНТ ИЗ TONNEL (или нет) Более 1 млн пользователей были удалены из-за неактивности в боте. У тебя появилась возможность стать моим рефералом! А если серьезно — для флипа я выбираю именно Portal. Но в некоторых случаях использую связку обоих маркетов.
Методичка хомячка: 1. Купить на хаях. 2. Трястись из-за каждой просадки. 3. Дождаться минус 50–90%. 4. Продать всё, лишь бы сохранить хоть что-то. Бонус: При возвращении ликвидности в рынок залететь опять на хаях. Вы сейчас на каком пункте?
❤2🔥1
🚫 Очередной говно проект залистился! Как обычно, у людей весь рот в иксах, все довольные, завтра всем табором пойдём милостыню просить. Сам на проект забил ещё во времена пикселя, когда добавили критерии. Надеюсь, вы не сильно погружались в этот проект и немного донатили. Как я понял, чтобы уйти в ноль, нужен курс 0,008 $ 😣 ☺️Для меня было большим удивлением, что PocketFI какую-то денюжку раздал, так ещё и без вло…
❤3💯2
🚫 Осторожно, скам! Мошенники пишут в личные сообщения от имени Portals. В разделе «О себе» они указывают @portals, выдавая это за юзернейм. Не переходите по ссылкам и не переводите средства. ✅Используйте только официального бота!
❤3
Voice message, posted without a caption
2 минуты до отправления этого дерьма в стакан. У многих токены вообще не дошли на Bitget, и теперь им, вроде как, придётся выводить ончейн. +2$🤡
👍1
Какая же контора пи…🤬 Сегодня утром с бирж были списаны токены $PAWS. Это связано с тем, что вчера по ошибке некоторые пользователи получили в 1.5–2 раза больше токенов, чем должны были, а другие — наоборот, ничего не получили. Сначала все подумали, что это бонусы, но позже выяснилось, что команда в очередной раз обосралась. Ожидаем очередной перенос листинга!
🤬2❤1🤡1
💎Мои $PAWS поступили на баланс Bybit Убрали 3% комиссию за вывод на биржи. Спасибо и на этом. Кстати, что вообще изменилось за этот месяц? Или они так и не смогли договориться с другими биржами и решили залиститься хоть как-нибудь? Напоминаю, эти придурки ещё в декабре делали снимок, а потом каждый раз откладывали листинг. Так ради чего всё это было? Binance нет, OKX тоже в списке не вижу. И теперь ещё выходим на …
👍3💩1
Всех причастных с праздником! С профессиональным праздником! С днем хомяка! Ура, товарищи 🎉
❤3🏆1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cryptopiaton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 729,826 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptopia” (@cryptopiaton), 342 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopiaton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.