Спасибо за сделку 🤝
❤55🔥16🤡15😁7

Channel
@cryptopasya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,866subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002140652564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopasya |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopasya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 3,866 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 3,876 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 3,878 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,599 reactions across 19 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 4,147 | 39.1% | |
| 💩 | 2,235 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1,050 | 9.91% | |
| ❤ | 906 | 8.55% | |
| 👎 | 606 | 5.72% | |
| 🤮 | 459 | 4.33% | |
| 👍 | 282 | 2.66% | |
| 🖕 | 201 | 1.90% | |
| 🤬 | 164 | 1.55% | |
| 😁 | 141 | 1.33% | |
| 🤣 | 132 | 1.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 117 | 1.10% | |
| 😢 | 40 | 0.377% | |
| 🏆 | 39 | 0.368% | |
| ✍ | 12 | 0.113% | |
| 👨💻 | 11 | 0.104% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 0.094% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 0.066% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 0.066% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.057% | |
| 12 further kinds | 27 | 0.255% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,599reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptopasya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2025 to 25 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спасибо за сделку 🤝
❤55🔥16🤡15😁7
Только что прошла сделка на 7 #1 гифтов за 77000 TON 💰 #1 флор теперь официально 1000000 ⭐️ как в ТГ так и на маркетах 🎁 https://t.me/nft/ArtisanBrick-1 https://t.me/nft/RareBird-1 https://t.me/nft/CloverPin-1 https://t.me/nft/WhipCupcake-1 https://t.me/nft/JoyfulBundle-1 https://t.me/nft/FaithAmulet-1 https://t.me/nft/IonicDryer-1 Огромное спасибо @wildbee_00 за сделку! Загляните к нему на канал: @cryptopasya 👋
🤡32❤🔥18❤4🔥3👍1
Мой первый раз с Соланой Сегодня попробовал залететь на Jup DTF сейл Плюсы: +научился строить и отправлять транзакции в SOL +получил первый опыт работы с соланой +посмотрел по солскану как смартики строили транзы и буду учиться делать также Минусы: -0% проходка (недогазовал) -сжег людям 105 SOL -1к на ноды Ошибки: -количество инструкций можно было уменьшить, чем строит их фронт джупа -разделил сол на газ на 5 тра…
❤44🤡25👍11😁8🔥4🤮4👎2
Мой кейс по сейлу Vultisig ($VULT) Спойлер, чтобы был интерес прочитать данный пост: Профит - 90к$ с комиссионных. Из них половину получил Сева, просто потому что связал меня с человеком, которому нужно было заботить сейл. Да, именно так - 45к$ за одно знакомство 👀 Достаточно интересный вышел кейс, поэтому решил с ним с вами поделиться Как проходил сейл Формат - Whitelist Чтобы попасть в вайтлист, нужно было летом…
❤81👍25🤡14💩8❤🔥4🤮4🏆1👎1
Забрали токены, вернули стейбл( Что ж, спустя 12 дней тишины от Kraken (до сих пор никакого официального заявления они не сделали) - они просто рефнули успешные транзакции Была, конечно, надежда процентов на 5, что Kraken не захочет на первом сейле признавать тот факт, что они обложались и Егоров забрал у них аллокацию, а решат просто из своего кармана компенсировать (по идее, для них это копейки). Но нет Забавно,…
😢35🤡13❤10👎3🤮2💩1
Слоты FCFS фаза YieldBasis x Kraken & Legion Подробнее про сейл и проект - https://t.me/cryptoosmith/1481 Моя комиссия - 20% от профита Если я вас не знаю и за вас некому поручиться из моих знакомых, то залог 20% от суммы вашего депозита Под легион уже готова заготовка, осталось дождаться контракта На кракене еще нет страницы с сейлом, но надеюсь, что хотя бы 3 часа у меня будет на то, чтобы изучить и сделать софт…
🤡40👍39🤨6👎4❤3😁1
https://t.me/nft/ArtisanBrick-1 https://t.me/nft/ArtisanBrick-2 https://t.me/nft/ArtisanBrick-3 https://t.me/nft/MightyArm-2 https://t.me/nft/MightyArm-4 Хотел же блин с запасом закинуть звезд... Без бицухи в этот раз(
❤93🤡79👍22💩14👎11😭7😢4❤🔥2
Куплю ваши следующие подарки: не актуально Нужно в небольшом количестве! Не более 5 штук каждого подарка За ширп подарки готов переплатить, если они у вас есть в нужном количестве Сделки только через @GiftGuarantBot Писать в лс @didics2 (мой помощник, он отбирает, а сделка уже со мной)
🤡193💩32😁28🖕11❤9👎5👍3👏1
Продал все свои BNB и залетел фармить USD.AI Вот и закончилась моя история с BNB, которые я покупал еще в 2022 году примерно по $300-330. Сегодня продал последние остатки. Не знаю, рынок сейчас вообще не чувствую — слишком он какой-то тяжелый. Поэтому просто решил выполнить свое обещание, которое дал самому себе когда-то давно, что по 800+ я буду выходить каждый день по чуть-чуть, так и вышло, что средняя вышла где-…
🤡620🤮164💩133❤66🖕42👎12👍11🎃3
Закончил с подсчётом общей статистики, но думаю, в этот раз обойдёмся без публикации — чтобы не подкидывать дров в костёр TON-комьюнити Также хочу прорекламировать новеньким свои парсеры: 1) https://t.me/giftwhalefeed 2) https://t.me/giftwhaledeposits По ним можно примерно оценивать настроение рынка. Сейчас, например, количество продаж по 100+ TON в сутки очень сильно упало, что говорит о том, что, несмотря на стр…
🤡134💩47🔥38❤21🤮13✍12👎9👍3
Без негатива ребят Потратьте свою злость на обретение новых навыков и созидания P.S. в далеком 2017 в сфере Steam скинов я тоже был не доволен тем, что я не могу забирать выгодные скины руками, а все делали ребята поумнее своими софтами, тогда вместо негатива в комментариях у людей в профиле Стима я свою злость выплеснул в обретение новых навыков, что спустя годы принесло свои плоды А сейчас порог вхождения в стим …
🤡940🔥860❤261🤮201🤬164👍72😁41❤🔥26
Photo, posted without a caption
🤡468💩156❤🔥59🤮41❤24🖕13🔥7👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptopasya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 971,149 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пася” (@cryptopasya), 3,866 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopasya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.