Myself and some other Crypto OGs came together and decided to leverage on the latest token launchpad tech in the market to launch a Community Coin that can *NEVER* rug. And I’m being fr rn…. It actually can never RUG!!!!! Stop shilling random Pump tokens posted by an influencer that barely cares about you, stop bag working for another person's coin that will inevitably go to zero in less than a min. Come and be a …

Channel
Genio’s Corner
@cryptopappyupdates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,639subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002072968169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopappyupdates |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopappyupdates |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 3,639 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 3,655 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 3,657 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 3,657 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 143 | 65.3% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 21.5% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 5.94% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 5.48% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Reminder for anyone who got in early on the @Solstice _tg x Legion Sale If you pledged on the solstice sale during that early window for the Flares boost, you still need to register in the Flares program to get your bonus tokens when Legion launches Just connect the same wallet you used for the sale at Solstice app website, hit register, and accept the terms, it's very quick. Just do it now
🔥2
Some update on @Vault777public Referrals won’t be based on sign-ups anymore. They’ll be measured by: • Referred users’ trading volume • Their actual PnL contribution That means quality > quantity. Bringing active traders matters. Empty wallets don’t.
Phase 2 of @Vault777public is moving fully on-chain. That means: • On-chain leaderboard • Automated market resolution • Stronger anti-sybil protections • Capped one-time mint model All price-based markets will use Chainlink feeds and APIs. No manual intervention. Transparent. Automated. Verifiable.
❤11
On-chain gambling platforms are either unverifiable or require deposits you can't control. Most provably fair claims are just marketing with zero actual proof. I've been looking at @Vault777public on Arbitrum and the setup is legit different
❤11
Solstice quietly increased almost $40M in TVL in the last week After a kind of stagnant period for some weeks, @@solstice_tg has now reached $340M in TVL, an ATH and +12.5% on the week while the market keeps punishing Very important to see Solstice to keep expanding on this phase of the market as many protocols continue to lack in demand and Defi risk exposure *theorically* increases People derisk not only from th…
❤12
Did you participate in Solstice ICO? Do this ASAP. @solstice_tg is giving Flares bonuses to early ICO participants. bonuses range from 1M to 50M Flares, depending on: - your deposit amount - how early you participated (hours) to receive the bonus, the same wallet you used for the ICO must be registered on the Solstice dApp. if you haven’t done that yet, do it now so you don’t miss out on the Flares bonus.
👍10
NFT Volume Race Top 5 in 24 Hours (Magic Eden) @Vault777public This event is based on 24-hour trading volume, not market cap. Each collection will resolve to “Yes” if it ranks within the Top 5 by 24H volume on Magic Eden at the resolution time. Otherwise, it resolves to “No”. Resolution Source: Magic Eden Metric: 24H Volume Filter: 1D Trade the market here: https://markets.vault777.com/markets/nft-market-cap-race…
❤11
As we prepare to launch the on-chain testnet, $200K+ in total rewards are coming in Phase 2. Before we transition, here is the Phase 1 payout structure: $10,000 total USDC: - $5,000 PnL leaderboard - $5,000 Volume leaderboard No duplicate winners. Payout per leaderboard: 1st - $750 2nd - $500 3rd - $350 4th - $250 5th - $200 6th-10th - $125 each 11th-20th - $75 each 21st-35th - $60 each 36th-50th - $45 each Fi…
❤11👍1
Another Wednesday, another @solstice_tg 23.5 Degree Stream! This time they talk about Top Creators adapting to the current market! If you missed it please check out the recording https://x.com/solsticefi/status/2024124484135903497?s=46
❤11🔥1
i've already earned almost $865 in $USX from @solsticefi xeet biweekly rewards 👀 now just waiting for $SLX tge but i think there might be something is coming before that...
🔥15🫡2
From the first 5M PnL, to 10M, 25M, 50M and then be the first one ever who reached 100M+ PnL today on @Vault777public This is a good memory to be remembered on, Vault777 team did good on the product, next stage is mainnet.
🔥12❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptopappyupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptopappyupdates named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Genio’s Corner” (@cryptopappyupdates), 3,639 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopappyupdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.