Channel
@cryptookno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001673225183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptookno |
| Description | Checkers: http://bscheck.eu ✅ https://scamsniper.net ✅ https://tokensniffer.com ✅ https://honeypot.is ✅ https://chainabuse.com ✅ https://desk.lsr.finance 😐 C.EX: tiny.cc/Phem_Ex ✅ tiny.cc/Mexc ✅ tiny.cc/OKX ✅ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptookno |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 8 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 11 | 45.8% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 33.3% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2022 to 12 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
t.me/scamp2p/4
😢2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
29.05.2022: Композитный человек – картавый наёб гоев на текущей стадии закупки рекламы. Психологические манипуляции на продажу чего-то я выявил уже в первые дни в копипасте про «эксперимент». Phantom family это прошлый их проект. youtu.be/xacwWZMomds 6.08: Уже есть немамонты, которые отправляли им по 100, 250, 500, 1000$ за обучение https://teletype.in/@bleakpurple/composite-scam-pt2 https://teletype.in/@bleakpurpl…
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
😁6
Тупые совки, как можно было повестись на этот лохотрон?
😁5
@ttm_academy https://ttm.academy Что думаете о них? Следил месяца 3, оказались руснявыми пидарасами, как и множество людей в криптосфере, у которых жёсткая цензура на инакомыслие. (Та же ситуация в чате лохотронщика Утушкина @v_utushkin с его Mars DAO). Блокируют навсегда, если критикуешь аффилированные проекты. Цены на обучение в «академии» конские.
💩3
Сегодня прошёлся цепочкой по раковым каналам. Реклама потешная и ещё более стыдобная кринжовая становится. Рекомендую отписаться от долбоёбов, рекламирующих лохотрон-каналы.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @cryptookno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AntiScam” (@cryptookno), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptookno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.