Channel
@cryptonit01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002188483389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptonit01 |
| Description | «Cryptonit» Канал создан в развлекательных и познавательных целях, и не дает финансовых советов Все принятые вами инвестиционные решения принимаются под вашу ответственность |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptonit01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 3 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 17 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptonit01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 November 2024 to 17 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Экономические горки 🎢 - Уровень безработицы - Инфляция - Ключевая ставка Почему банки дают высокие проценты по вкладам и как это связано с высокой ключевой ставкой, уровнем инфляции и безработицы? Принцип работы Центробанка основывается на поддержании стабильной инфляции в районе 3-5% , это поддерживает стабильный рост всей экономики страны в целом. А вот для того чтобы разгонять или же наоборот остужать экономику…
👍1
Сделал второй канал для того чтобы разделить тематику постов. Этот канал про политику, а @blindinvestor про крипту
Наконец завезли конвертацию подарков в NFT На данный момент в моей коллекции 12 NFT подарков. Но продажа их на аукционе пока не возможна, ждем еще чуть-чуть и посмотрим какой профит с этого получится. Подарки конвертируются платно, стоимость 25 ⭐️ Как и любая NFT по всей видимости есть коллекции, и ценность NFT подарка будет определена за счет редкости. Мне попалось такое вот кольцо, по мне так очень стилевое 😎
Надеюсь мои ожидания не напрасны, я уже присматриваю себе недвижку Ладно шутки в сторону, если это все окажется правдой и начнет форсится в сми, это будет народный мем как тот же самый доге П-Нат пепе шиба и т.д Загадываю желание: капу в 100млн$ к новому году, 01.01.2025 поеду выбирать дом на покупку 😁
🤩1
🚀 Поделитесь с друзьями и зарабатывайте до 50% комиссии навсегда: https://t.me/tontrade?start=qsYRy9noBE Или, если вы предпочитаете более длинный вариант 😉, вот он: https://t.me/tontrade?start=Mxu2vROU-EQAs4TYFRmDReFfgVpLAEy-gP9FfviMFryZd1SY1wDObSXtv
Ситуация интересная назревает, если этот мем выйдет за пределы тона то Капа может взлететь в космос Взял в холд на 5 тон, уже в плюсе ☺️
🇮🇹 Макаронные войны на блокчейне TON — компания Barilla запрещает торговлю одноименным токеном Barilla — крупнейшая в мире компания по производству макаронных изделий. BARILLA — токен, запущенный на мемпаде Blum простыми работягами. Я уверен, что вы даже не слышали о таком проекте, но каким-то образом его заметила крупнейшая итальянская компания. Вчера на электронную почту разработчика сайта проекта пришло письмо…
Еще у Google в дополнение к блогпосту вышло интересное короткое видео про историю квантовых вычислений и Willow. Основная мысль: Первый свой квантовый чип Google выпустили в 2019. С того момента классические вычисления усовершенствовались в миллиарды раз. Но если классические вычисления растут по закону Мура, то квантовые растут и будут расти по закону Невена, а именно с двойной экспоненциальной скоростью относитель…
⚡️ Google выпустили Willow – первый в мире квантовый чип, который показывает экспоненциальную способность к масштабированию вычислений Впервые в истории у кого-то получилось создать логические кубиты, которые перформят ниже границы Quantum Error Correction. Это метод, при котором данные сохраняются путем распределения информации по нескольким кубитам. Дело в том, что обычно ошибки вычислений – ключевая проблема кван…
«Ищите другого лоха!»: Трамп пригрозил БРИКС 100% пошлинами за попытку отказаться от доллара, заявив, что «США больше не будут спокойно наблюдать». Какой сюр, по логике Трампа повышение пошлин должно остановить страны БРИКС от создания международной валюты. Но что примечательно, эти пошлины будут платить граждани США, как я понял, или же пошлины будут на оборот на продукцию которую США производит на экспорт. Пошлина…
Силуанов призвал россиян не думать о повышении ключевой ставки, «иначе сбудется» - аффирмация? 😁 Короче заряжаем себя на инфляцию в 3% и ключевую ставку в 5%
🔥1
🚀 Председатель SEC Гэри Генслер уходит в отставку 20 января - криптаны сегодня в хлам 😁
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptonit01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,339,246 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTONIT” (@cryptonit01), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonit01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.