CFTC-маршрут для Hyperliquid: почему доступ к рынку не равен инвестиционному разрешению Разбираю, почему возможный регуляторный маршрут для Hyperliquid не должен автоматически менять инвестиционный периметр. Доступ, риск и регламент - разные вещи. Читать полностью

Channel
Алексей Мокров. Современные технологии инвестирования
@cryptolyard
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,157subscribers
-1,491 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001677444656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptolyard |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptolyard |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 6,157 | -57 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 6,214 | -109 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 6,323 | -83 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 6,406 | -80 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 6,486 | -50 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 6,536 | -76 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 6,612 | -143 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 6,755 | -656 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 7,411 | -76 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 7,487 | -84 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 7,571 | -61 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 7,632 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 7,648 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 7,648 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 14s
- Average length
- 2m 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
179 reactions across 48 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 118 | 65.9% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 21.2% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.68% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.559% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.559% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.559% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.559% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Найденное золото и SPOT: зачем отделять актив от права распоряжаться им Почему найденное золото полезно как пример для инвестора: актив сам по себе не равен законному и процедурному контролю над ним. Читать полностью
❤3
HIVE показала рост выручки на 73%: почему прибыль от майнинга не снимает главный риск HIVE Digital Technologies сообщила о росте выручки до $79,1 млн в Q1 2027. Разбираю, что значат майнинг Bitcoin, AI-направление, убыток и CapEx для инвесторов. Читать полностью
❤3
DeFi в ожидании правил: почему алгоритму нельзя жить на рыночном импульсе Разбор Алексея Мокрова: почему регуляторная неопределённость DeFi требует регламента, лимитов и дисциплины в автоматизированном инвестировании. Читать полностью
❤4
Bitcoin у зоны $57 000: почему ликвидации лонгов могут ускорить падение CoinDesk указывает на $57 000 как ключевую зону ликвидаций лонгов по Bitcoin. Разбираю механизм, риски ликвидности, сценарии и сигналы для инвестора. Читать полностью
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Как отличить пересмотр решения от желания отыграться: разбор CRYPTOBOTPRO LLC на примере Билла Экмана и Netflix Как инвестору отличить рациональный повторный вход от эмоциональной попытки отыграться после болезненной продажи. Разбор поведенческого риска от Алексея Мокрова. Читать полностью
🔥3
XRP у $1: почему ставка трейдеров на отскок стала риском для рынка Разбор ситуации с XRP: открытый интерес во фьючерсах вырос, трейдеры Binance и OKX стоят в лонгах, а падение ниже $1 может усилить принудительные продажи. Читать полностью
💯3
Morgan Stanley наращивает крипто-ETF: почему частному инвестору нужен свой регламент, а не чужой жест Институциональная экспозиция в крипто-ETF важна как контекст, но не как команда к повторению. Разбираю, как частному инвестору действовать через регламент. Читать полностью
❤3
OCC одобрил банковский чартер для World Liberty: почему это важно для stablecoin-рынка Разбор условного одобрения OCC для World Liberty Trust: что меняется для USD1, кастодиального хранения, регулирования stablecoins и инвесторов. Читать полностью
❤3
Один заголовок, два импульса: что делать инвестору, когда продажи спорят с регуляторным прогрессом Как разбирать новость, где давление продаж конфликтует с регуляторным прогрессом: механизм, риски, регламент действий и роль SPOT-подхода. Читать полностью
🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @cryptolyard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Dyat_Lera · 46,843
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
@princesssohot · 161,060
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Мокров. Современные технологии инвестирования” (@cryptolyard), 6,157 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptolyard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.