Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Криптоновости и закон

@cryptolaw007

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,524subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002463409241
TypeChannel
Username@cryptolaw007
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptolaw007

Growth

1,5211,5241,522.57 August 2026 — 1,521 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,524 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,521–1,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:231,524+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:301,523+2
7 Aug 2026, 00:311,521first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.1%
avg views ÷ 1,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
824
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total8,238
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4436.7%
3327.5%
🔥3125.8%
54.17%
😢32.50%
🤔21.67%
👎10.833%
😁10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC406 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptohodlnewPoll

Готовы ли вы оплачивать покупки в Беларуси стейблами если комиссия будет 1-1,5%

  1. Да47%
  2. Нет54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥2😁1

Signed Светлана

29 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC650 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @byka_kropka_by

Вышло большое видео с Катей Логвинович в котором мы обсудили все юридические вопросы по криптовалюте в Беларуси! В этом выпуске мы разбираем самые острые и неудобные вопросы о налогах на криптовалюту в Беларуси вместе с экспертом-юристом. Поговорим о том, как легально выводить крипту в фиат, что грозит за P2P-обмены и почему трейдерам и майнерам невозможно избежать статуса "тунеядца". Обсудим нюансы работы с иностра

10👍6🔥5

Signed Светлана

28 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC758 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @weexpromoPhoto

🤩🤩🤩 | Комиссия 0% на покупку USDT за RUB 🤩 Отмечаем партнерство WEEX и Whitebird специальным предложением для наших пользователей. Как воспользоваться предложением: 🤩 Перейдите в раздел Быстрая покупка. 🤩 Выберите USDT и валюту RUB. 🤩 Укажите Whitebird в качестве способа оплаты. 🤩 Завершите покупку с помощью банковской карты. 🗓 Акция действует: c 28 июля по 16 августа включительно. Купить USDT без комиссии 🔼 🤩

3👍3🔥2

Signed Светлана

25 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC866 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @logvinovich_business

🇺🇿 На карте финансовых центров мира появился новый "IFC", а именно, TIFC - Tashkent International Finance Center. Сегодня вступил в силу Конституционный Закон Узбекистана о создании Ташкентского финансового центра (ТМФЦ, TIFC). TIFC - это новый региональный финансовый хаб с льготными условиями для ведения бизнеса. В центре разрешено заниматься полным спектром финансовых услуг, включая традиционную банковскую, инвес

Signed Светлана

23 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC922 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CIFRA_CONSULTPhoto

Многие из Вас ощутили (надеемся, не на себе), что налоговое законодательство и практика его применения в последнее время становится все жестче и требовательнее по отношению к налогоплательщикам, подкидывая порой «неожиданные финты». Одним из достаточно непредвиденных и неожиданных изменений, влекущим риски налоговых доначислений, явилось изменение, внесенное в Общую часть Налогового кодекса Республики Беларусь с 01.

😢3👍1👎1

Signed Светлана

22 Jul 2026, 21:48 UTC855 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.threads.com/@imns_minsk/post/DbFex7WgpfT?xmt=AQG0d7ejb9wjhODw5RLFzu0aGj-2eAmD5doHnpdZn180DbRKo_5M0O0lCK0B-SLjgxOOElE&slof=1

Signed Светлана

22 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC954 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.nbrb.by/bv

🤔2

Signed Светлана

18 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,150 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zikratski_law

Правовое регулирование криптобанка с 18 июля 2026 года в Беларуси можно зарегистрировать криптобанк. Тема достаточная узкая, и те, кто занимается подготовкой к регистрации криптобанка, наверняка, уже все документы знают, а другим, наверное не так и интересно, поэтому я не делал комментариев к ним. Тем не менее, раз уж я их смотрел, к дате вступления в силу Указа, решил просто систематизировать перечень актов по эт

9👍1

Signed Светлана

18 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC793 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @belta_telegramm

В Беларуси вступили в силу нормы о криптобанках и контроле в сфере цифровых знаков

Signed Светлана

14 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC≈4,950 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/6z3UK9m_8sk

👍8

Signed Светлана

11 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,080 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptosos_kaPhoto

🔥 Whitebird стал ещё удобнее. Если раньше я советовала Whitebird как один из самых удобных сервисов для покупки и продажи криптовалюты, то теперь у них появилась ещё и полноценная спотовая торговля. Теперь в одном месте можно: ✅ купить или продать криптовалюту; ✅ торговать на споте через рыночные и лимитные ордера; ✅ хранить активы и не переводить их на другую биржу. Также мне нравится, что здесь можно легально о

🔥172

Signed Светлана

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptolaw007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll662 voters

Готовы ли вы оплачивать покупки в Беларуси стейблами если комиссия будет 1-1,5%

  1. Да47%
  2. Нет54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 983,095 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Криптоновости и закон” (@cryptolaw007), 1,524 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptolaw007.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.