Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for cryptoholic

Channel

cryptoholic

@cryptoholiks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,127subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285354092
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoholiks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoholiks

Growth

1,1271,1421,134.57 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 17 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,125–1,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 17:171,127-4
21 Aug 2026, 09:541,131-5
15 Aug 2026, 04:381,136-3
11 Aug 2026, 15:311,139-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:161,142no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:061,142first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6366.3%
custom 52152399484200036282122.1%
custom 52402428514255591751111.6%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20,249
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 19 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
5,060
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoholiks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC158 views5 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Hyperliquid сжигает в сутки примерно 0.02% суплая HYPE PumpFun сжигает примерно 0.06% от супплая PUMP в сутки. А разница капитализации почти в 16 раз

🔥5

21 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC191 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Мне кажется или это GRAM по 3$ https://t.me/durov/533

🔥6custom 52402428514255591751

27 Jun 2026, 07:29 UTC331 views5 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Portals (тг-маркетплейс подарков) запустили Полимаркет прямо в телеграме. Т.е. буквально все те же события и ликвидность, только внутри тг-миниапп. С пополнением в Gram. Portex

🔥5

16 Jun 2026, 10:58 UTC405 views5 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Hype ATH, были предупреждены не один раз. И это при том, что биток торгуется на уровне -50% от своих хаев.

🔥5

2 Jun 2026, 08:06 UTC487 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Стейкинг подарков на MRKT приносит в сутки ~в 3 раза больше TON, чем стейкинг на Portals при том, что %APR на Portals выше. И самое интересное, на MRKT лежит подарков на кратно меньшую сумму

🔥6custom 52402428514255591752

1 Jun 2026, 15:43 UTC389 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Теперь официально меняют тикер TON на GRAM. TON остается названием блокчейна. Буллишь

🔥8

1 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC352 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А почему бы и нет UPD: голосование удалили

22 May 2026, 12:47 UTC341 views3 reactions5,050 Starsread 7 August 2026

Будем считать что это был колл на покупку

🔥3

15 May 2026, 07:02 UTC527 views8 reactions5,050 Starsread 7 August 2026

Куда пойдет биток не знаю Ton кажется на продолжение роста Hype рано или поздно будет 100$

custom 52152399484200036285🔥2custom 52402428514255591751

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptoholiks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“cryptoholic” (@cryptoholiks), 1,127 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoholiks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.