Channel
@cryptofaktor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001692333868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptofaktor |
| Description | Саме актуальне та головне у світі крипти. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptofaktor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 17 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 20 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TEXWallet.org — Будьте першими, хто зазирне у майбутнє! 🚀 Шановна спільното TronTrade! У нас важлива новина — ми запустили нашу лендинг-сторінку на TEXWallet.org! 🎉 Сайт ще активно розробляється, але це ваш унікальний шанс зазирнути «за лаштунки» і бути серед перших, хто оцінить наш прогрес: 🖥 Що вже чекає на вас на сайті: ▶️ Дизайн майбутнього додатку — ознайомтеся з чистим та інтуїтивним інтерфейсом ▶️ Статус …
Signed Sergiy Kravets
TEXWallet.org — Be the First to Glimpse the Future! 🚀 Dear TronTrade community! We have an important announcement — we've launched our landing page at TEXWallet.org! 🎉 The site is still under active development, but this is your unique chance to get a "behind-the-scenes" look and be among the first to assess our progress: 🖥 What's already waiting for you on the site: ▶️ The Future App Design — check out the clea…
Signed Sergiy Kravets
😁😁😁 #Altcoins #CryptoPortfolio ——————————————————— 🇺🇦 Dvizh — рухай крипту разом з нами 🔄 Обмін валют ℹ️ Support Bot ▶️ Наші ресурси
Signed Sergiy Kravets
Ринки очікують завтрашнього рішення по ставці від ФРС. Зниження точно буде, але якщо тільки на 0.25% то ринок вже це заклав у ціну і вагомих рухів вгору можемо не побачити. Тим часом з бірж виводять великі обсяги BTC що означає зниження тиску пропозиції , а в ETF продовжуються притоки капіталів у ETH та BTC . На графіку показав індекс долару, він знижується в очікуванні рішення ФРС. Інвестори вже продають для тог…
Signed Sergiy Kravets
🇺🇸⚠️ США могли б погасити свій держборг криптовалютою 🗣 Трамп в інтерв’ю Fox Business: «Хто знає, можливо, ми просто віддамо частину боргу в BTC і таким чином “зітремо” наші $35 трлн. Це інша форма валюти, і в результаті це піде на користь країні. Якщо ми цього не зробимо, інші країни приймуть таку практику. Краще, щоб ми були лідерами».
Signed Sergiy Kravets
🚀 Альтсезон на горизонті? У 2017 та 2022 співвідношення сукупної капіталізації альтів до BTC досягало 1.67x та 1.78x 👉 Якщо у 2025–2026 повториться схожий сценарій, капіталізація крипторинку може зрости до $6 трильйонів — говорить Jasper De Maere з Wintermute 💬 ETH уже показав активність, але справжній альтсезон ще навіть не починався. Втім ринок явно рухається в цьому напрямку.
Signed Sergiy Kravets
😁😁😁
Signed Sergiy Kravets
Чи може крипторинок повторити фінансову кризу 2008 року? У новому відео обговорюється: Які паралелі можна провести між тодішніми подіями та нинішнім станом криптовалют; Чи справді ринок стоїть на межі великого обвалу, чи це лише чергова корекція; Які сценарії розвитку можуть чекати інвесторів найближчим часом. 👉 Подивіться відео та поділіться своєю думкою: Чи варто готуватися до найгіршого, чи все ще є шанс на з…
Signed Sergiy Kravets
Welcome to WallStreet.
Signed Sergiy Kravets
🌐🤑😳
Signed Sergiy Kravets
😁😁😁
😁2
Signed Sergiy Kravets
🧠 Чому трейдери втрачають гроші — навіть коли ринок дає шанс заробити? 👀 Натрапив на цікаве відео — коротко, по ділу і про найголовніше: як емоції та мислення шкодять у трейдингу. 👉 Дивитись відео 🔍 Що у випуску: – 5 ментальних пасток, які не дають торгувати тверезо – Чому важко фіксувати прибуток або вийти зі збитку – Як мозок обманює нас в момент прийняття рішень 💡 Корисне навіть для досвідчених. 📌 Перевір, чи не…
Signed Sergiy Kravets
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cryptofaktor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cryptofaktor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"CryptoFaktor"” (@cryptofaktor), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptofaktor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.