Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CryptoExplorer ✪

Channel

CryptoExplorer ✪

@cryptoexplorer

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,884subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001252369653
TypeChannel
Usernames@cryptoexplorer @cryptoexplorerchannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoexplorer

Growth

4,8844,9004,8926 August 2026 — 4,900 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,900 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,893 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,890 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,884 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,882–4,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:344,884-6
12 Aug 2026, 11:474,890-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:524,893-7
6 Aug 2026, 08:104,900no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:224,900first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3376.7%
🔥49.30%
👍36.98%
👎36.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 6 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC≈2,780 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💼 India Advances Digital Rupee with Innovative Wallet Partnership India is pushing forward its digital rupee initiative by partnering with DC Wallet and AFC India. This collaboration aims to reach 200 million users, focusing on increasing accessibility for unbanked communities. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

7👎3

5 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC≈2,530 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📈 Ethereum Poised for Significant Growth Ethereum's recent lackluster performance might be setting the stage for substantial gains, as Gautam Chhugani suggests that strong fundamentals and growing institutional interest could boost its value soon. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI ​

2

4 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC≈1,980 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📈 SEC Eyes Solana and XRP ETFs: Altcoin Surge Imminent? The SEC's consideration of Solana and XRP ETFs has raised hopes for approval, creating buzz around a possible surge in the altcoin market. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

2👍2

3 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC≈1,840 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏛️ Trump Era Sparks Hope for Crypto-Friendly Laws With Trump's anticipated return, the crypto industry is hopeful for swift advancements in pro-crypto legislation, potentially moving away from stringent SEC regulations. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

1

2 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC≈1,250 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇧🇷 Brazil Eyes Bitcoin Reserve Brazilian congressman Eros Biondini has proposed creating a national bitcoin reserve, taking inspiration from the U.S. and aiming to integrate cryptocurrency into the nation’s financial framework. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI ​

1

29 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💰 Vancouver Catches the Crypto Wave with Bitcoin Reserve Proposal The mayor of Vancouver is taking a bold step by proposing the creation of a Bitcoin reserve aimed at fortifying the city's financial standing, aligning with a global movement towards governmental cryptocurrency adoption. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

1

28 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC946 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📊 Trump Considers Handing Crypto Oversight to CFTC The Trump administration is contemplating a significant shift in crypto regulation by possibly transferring oversight responsibilities to the CFTC. This move is seen as a stride towards a more favorable regulatory environment for the digital asset industry. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

1

27 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC861 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖 Trump's Vision: AI and Crypto Czars to Head Tech Policy Donald Trump has unveiled plans to appoint dedicated AI and crypto czars to centralize U.S. technological policy. This move aims to enhance innovation and fortify America's leadership in these transformative sectors. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI ​

1

26 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC844 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💸 Rumble Embraces Bitcoin with $20 Million Investment Rumble is allocating $20 million into Bitcoin as a strategy to hedge against inflation, while also making waves by bolstering its gaming division through a contentious partnership with Dr. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI ​

2

25 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC806 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 Trump's Treasury Choice Set to Ignite Crypto Revolution Trump has chosen Scott Bessent as his Treasury pick, a known pro-crypto advocate. This move could potentially transform U.S. policy by enhancing blockchain innovation and accelerating digital asset adoption. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI

1

22 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC923 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 Trump Eyes Bitcoin Reserve and Pro-Crypto Council! Trump is unveiling a bold pro-crypto strategy, featuring a Bitcoin Reserve and an advisory council targeted at enhancing U.S. dominance in the crypto space and improving regulatory frameworks. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI ​

2🔥1

21 Nov 2024, 17:30 UTC927 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇨🇳 Chinese Court Legalizes Crypto Ownership China's High Court officially recognizes cryptocurrencies as legal commodities, allowing for limited use. However, the strict bans on token fundraising and crypto business activities are still in place. 🔗 Read more or if you're lazy try CryptoExplorer AI​

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoexplorer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,342,491 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoExplorer ✪” (@cryptoexplorer), 4,884 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoexplorer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.