Написал статью о будущем Telegram, и тому куда мы можем придти в конечном счете с подарками. Советую почитать. https://telegra.ph/Pochemu-ne-nuzhno-nedoocenivat-Podarki-v-Telegram-Web2---Web3-02-17
🔥11👍2

Channel
@cryptodegenie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002253561628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptodegenie |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 6 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptodegenie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 169 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 170 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 173 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 173 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
202 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 86 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 28.2% | |
| custom 5310119641459206495 | 16 | 7.92% | |
| custom 5431365679167067758 | 15 | 7.43% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 3.96% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| custom 5447408958270625140 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 17 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptodegenie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2024 to 17 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Написал статью о будущем Telegram, и тому куда мы можем придти в конечном счете с подарками. Советую почитать. https://telegra.ph/Pochemu-ne-nuzhno-nedoocenivat-Podarki-v-Telegram-Web2---Web3-02-17
🔥11👍2
Тут если что надо прожать кнопки, и забустить канал. 🔪 Будьте внимательны 🎁
👍8
А раз уж такие дела, то давайте и розыгрыш стартанем с вами 😉
🔥6
🎉 Giveaway Finished! 🎉 Winners received the following gifts: 1. Love Potion #283 - Telegram Link 2. Love Potion #770 - Telegram Link 3. Love Potion #791 - Telegram Link 4. Love Potion #800 - Telegram Link 5. Love Potion #2352 - Telegram Link
custom 53101196414592064958🔥3
Чем я вообще сейчас занят? В Telegram активно трендятся различные подарки, которые можно превратить в NFT. 🎁 В основном, единственное место вокруг TON куда направлено мое внимание сейчас связано с подарками внутри TG, проекты выходившие на TON пока вообще не оправдывают ожиданий, графики по всем лишь постоянно пробивают новое дно, надеюсь что ситуация изменится в будущем. Когда вы покупаете подарок за звезды и ул…
👍7🌚1👀1
Долго ждал, чтоб написать об итогах Not Pixel. ⬜️ Итак, Airdrop случился, токены раздали. 💥 Что имеем. На текущий момент нет листинга на CEX-биржах (Binance, ByBit, OKX). И неизвестно, будет ли он. Скорее всего - не в ближайшее время. 🫴 За счет всех этих факторов получаем цену в 0.21$ за 1 $PX. К сожалению, это не выводит в плюс донатеров которые вкладывали деньги в игру (и меня в том числе). Для себя делаю выво…
👍10💯5🔥3👀1custom 53101196414592064951
Итак, пиксель посчитал итоговый дроп. Бегом проверять в приложение, если еще не проверили! Довольны результатом?
👍4👎3
Появилась информация по листингу Not Pixel. Читаем: telegra.ph/Not-Pixel-FAQs-01-07 И терпеливо ждем! Думаю, ожидание того стоит 🪙
👍8
Теперь подарки внутри Telegram можно превратить в NFT. У меня есть, вот три таких рарных Pepe, у каждого после улучшения появляются свои уникальные особенности. Получается, эпоха веб3 собственности в Telegram уже совсем близко :) Через 3 недели узнаем, выгодное ли это было вложение. 1 Pepe стоил примерно ~ 30$, сейчас на вторичном рынке их покупают от 50$ и выше. Через 21 день откроется возможность продавать их на…
👍4
С наступившим Новым годом🎁 В 2025 здесь будет много интересного, постараюсь сильно прокачать контент 🎁 Для крипты год тоже обещает быть интересным, готовимся 🚀
🔥6👍2
Капча в Not Pixel. Если у вас ранее были проблемы с ее прохождением, попробуйте еще раз, все теперь должно работать. Инструкция в официальном канале: https://t.me/notpixel_channel/231
👍5custom 54313656791670677585
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥4👍2custom 54474089582706251402
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptodegenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,075,156 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Degen” (@cryptodegenie), 169 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptodegenie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.