Channel
@cryptoconsulting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,798subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001123879865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoconsulting |
| Created | 7 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoconsulting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 3,798 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 3,799 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 3,801 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 3,800 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,800 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2020 to 12 May 2020, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Судя по всему, SEC явно дали понять, что не позволят приложению телеграма добавлять криптофункции. Дуров зависит от магазинов приложений Google Play и App Store, и если он закроет глаза на запреты и добавит функции кошелька и оплаты в мобильное приложение, скорее всего он получит бан, и телегу вообще уберут из магазинов. Поэтому Дуров официально заявил о том, что проектом они заниматься не будут. SEC довольны. Но ве…
👎1
Телеграм всё-таки не будет запускать TON https://telegra.ph/What-Was-TON-And-Why-It-Is-Over-05-12
👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
Не знаю кто ждет туземун в ближайшее время - как по мне, биток находится не в аптренде, а в коррекции после падения, и она почти завершена. Чтобы глобально выйти в аптренд, надо пробивать уровни 10к и 12к, и не хвостом на пятиминутке, а закреплением недельной свечки. Халвинг сам по себе не особо влияет на цену - ведь добыто и так 88% битков – давление майнеров на рынок невелико. Это лишь инфоповод, чтобы продать бит…
Вот и вынесли шортистов. Теперь снова ожидаю откат, но не сильный. 27 марта истекают опционы, и их очень много. Если рост и будет, то с большой вероятностью после их истечения.
Небольшой пролив до 6к - и резкий рост шортистов на битмексе. Такое чувство, что сейчас зашли в шорт абсолютно все, даже те, кто раньше это не делал. Вы там это, осторожнее что ли.
Для отслеживания количества заболевших/умерших, на tradingview.com добавили тикеры CONFIRMED / DEATHS
Realities of a trader 1. Losing money makes us feel inadequate 2. Making money (but never enough) makes us feel inadequate 3. Being on the sidelines makes us feel inadequate A purpose of the market is to make us feel inadequate Welcome to the life I've lived for 45 years
Вот для сравнения S&P, та же МА200 на 1w графике. Если цена уходит ниже - лучше выйти, и дождаться пока она вернется.
Глобально вот такой треугольник рисуется. Белая линия - МА200
На даунтренде обычно держат цену и не дают выйти, откаты незначительные. На аптренде - не дают войти. Когда биток свалился с 10500 до 7800, это уже был знак того, что будет ниже, но я почему-то это проигнорировал. Сейчас же идет рост без откатов - цену специально удерживают, чтобы не дать закупиться тем, кто распродался внизу. Кроме того, биток ОТВЯЗАЛСЯ ОТ S&P и РАСТЕТ В КРИЗИС! Вопрос только в том, как долго будет…
Ракета летит вверх
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoconsulting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Биток 7650$, доллар - 75р. Страшно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2020 to 12 May 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 240,513 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Consulting” (@cryptoconsulting), 3,798 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoconsulting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.