Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Coinfessions ✖️

@cryptocoinfession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,400subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295263110
TypeChannel
Username@cryptocoinfession
DescriptionAnonymous Crypto Confessions aggregator 🫣 Ads 📣 https://telega.io/channels/cryptocoinfession/card?r=hfIAonHC 👤
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptocoinfession

Growth

9,4009,4179,408.57 August 2026 — 9,417 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,417 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,416 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,400 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,397–9,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:159,400-16
7 Aug 2026, 10:449,416-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:159,417no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:099,417first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,300
Videos
4
Links
2,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
51s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2730.0%
2628.9%
🤣1011.1%
😁910.0%
🔥88.89%
🤡55.56%
🤔33.33%
👏11.11%
😢11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 22:40 UTC≈1,080 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

How Bitcoin Works When There Are No More Coins to Mine ⛏ Bitcoin has a hard cap of 21 million coins. About 20.023 million have been mined so far, leaving just under 1 million remaining. New coins enter circulation through block rewards: miners currently earn 3.125 BTC every ten minutes. Every four years, that amount is cut in half, and around 2140, the last fraction of a bitcoin will be mined 🟠. After that, block

👍3

4 May 2026, 22:39 UTC890 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍21

20 Mar 2026, 22:15 UTC≈1,530 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

S&P 500 Loses Its Last Major Support 🔽 The S&P 500 dipped below its 200-day moving average for the first time since March 2025. This is the line that separates long-term uptrends from everything else. 📆 I've been saying that stock market is cooked since November. The distribution signals were there for months. Then the Iran war hit and accelerated everything. ⏺Energy prices started climbing, inflation fears return

3🔥3

19 Jan 2026, 22:47 UTC≈1,880 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

This is how bot operators cheat in online poker and make tons of money 🃏 They run coordinated bot farms. Multiple bots sit at the same table and share their cards and game data outside the platform. 🤖 Instead of playing independently, they act as one system, avoiding each other and making decisions using information real humans (victims) never have. It’s one of the main reasons online poker is much tougher than it

👍3

28 Dec 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,710 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

What I’d do in crypto if I only had $1,000 🤑 First, the more money you have, the easier it is to generate livable income. Making $1k–$10k a month in crypto is realistic but you need big capital. With $1k, it's usually pretty hard to earn anything. 🤔 If I truly had only $1k, the rational move would be to get a job, save, and come back with more capital so the time spent actually pays off. But if I was forced to cli

1👏1

25 Dec 2025, 09:55 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Merry Christmas, Crypto Coinfession community! 🎄 Wishing you joy, growth, and smart crypto moves. Thank you for being part of the journey—more insights and wins ahead! 🚀✨

👍2

15 Dec 2025, 23:40 UTC≈1,470 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is down 5% today, once again front running the stock market, which is slowly chopping downward 📉 Price action looks absolutely disgusting, no sign of bounces whatsoever. During this decline, more than $558.61M worth of futures long positions were liquidated in the last 24h. 🤔 It seems that the current narrative is that Fed rate cuts are no longer seen as a bullish sign, but rather as a rush to avoid economi

👍21

5 Dec 2025, 23:47 UTC≈1,350 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Another reminder to stay anon and not flex your wealth, especially if you are in crypto ⚠️ A 21-year-old guy from Ukraine was kidnapped in Vienna, tortured, and killed after two men forced him to hand over his crypto wallet passwords. They emptied his wallets, took his cash, and tried to hide the murder by burning his car. Both suspects were later arrested 🚓 👮‍♀️ This is the kind of risk people forget about. If oth

4🔥2🤔1

18 Nov 2025, 06:38 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

There's a very rare chart pattern on the BTC/USD today. The price action is absolutely nasty 🤣

🤣7😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptocoinfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 938,241 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Coinfessions ✖️” (@cryptocoinfession), 9,400 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocoinfession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.