Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Pump Club 📈

@cryptoclubpump

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

58,917subscribers

-373 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520252993
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoclubpump
DescriptionWe drop insider projects right before the pump. Welcome to the inside. BEWARE OF FAKE ACCOUNTS. This and @crypto_pumps_p are our only real accounts.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoclubpump

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@crypto_pumps_p/854726 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC@cryptoclubpump/2493 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_pumps_p/854830 Jul 2026, 22:55 UTC@cryptoclubpump/2494 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 22:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoclubpump/2496 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 23:34 UTC@crypto_pumps_p/855031 Jul 2026, 23:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoclubpump/2497 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC@crypto_pumps_p/85511 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoclubpump/2500 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC@crypto_pumps_p/85542 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoclubpump/2501 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC@crypto_pumps_p/85552 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_pumps_p11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@crypto_pumps_p (110)
@solpump10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (64)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @crypto_pumps_p. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far above this size band

42,800 average views per post against 58,917 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.6%. Across the 2,906 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,629–99,981 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.91% and 12.2%, with a median of 5.54%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled898,100
Mature posts only72.6% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers58,917 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 2,906 channels · p10 0.437% · p25 1.91% · p50 5.54% · p75 12.2% · p90 23.6%
Position in cohort99.793th percentile · 13.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.015% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

58,91759,29059,103.57 August 2026 — 59,290 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,286 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,241 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,143 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59,001 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,970 subscribers12 August 2026 — 58,917 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,861–59,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:5458,917-53
11 Aug 2026, 14:3658,970-31
10 Aug 2026, 16:1759,001-142
9 Aug 2026, 17:4159,143-98
8 Aug 2026, 15:4759,241-45
7 Aug 2026, 17:2859,286-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:4559,290first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.6%
avg views ÷ 58,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
42,800
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total898,100
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
801
Videos
47
Links
445

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC≈42,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥INSIDER LAUNCH ANNOUNCEMENT!🔥 Date: August 13, THURSDAY Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 ET) Pair: SOL/??? Exchange: RAYDIUM (Solana) Target: 1,500%+ Our last Insider Launch was a complete success, but it's nothing compared to what we're about to see this Sunday... Get ready for the biggest Insider Launch of the year🔥 You are the insiders now Review our guides, and stay tuned 👉BUYING GUIDE: USING PHANTOM 👉BUYING GUIDE: U

2 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈43,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$SAM RESULT ————————— PEAK: 1,471% ANOTHER FLAWLESS PUMP!!🔥 All the members of this channel got the coin 45 minutes before the official launch on Twitter, which sent it to over 1,400% in a matter of minutes. Even though huge profits were booked, we have something even bigger under our sleeves The market is not ready for what's about to come... Stay tuned.

2 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈43,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 $SAM 🔥 ——————————————— THIS INSIDER LAUNCH HAS FINISHED, STAY TUNED FOR FURTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS

2 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈43,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥5 MINUTES LEFT🔥 The next message is the Contract Address

2 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈42,900 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥15 MINUTES LEFT🔥 THE TRENCHES ARE READY

2 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈42,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥30 MINUTES LEFT🔥 🌐Read our guides in the last message if you have any question about buying on RAYDIUM! There is no second chance.

2 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈42,800 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥1 HOUR LEFT🔥 Everything is perfectly aligned for today's insider launch. We're ready for the biggest Solana move we've EVER seen! ——————————— 🌐IMPORTANT: HAVE YOUR SOL READY AND REVIEW OUR INSIDER LAUNCH GUIDES. THIS WON'T BE HAPPENING AGAIN... 👉BUYING GUIDE: USING PHANTOM 👉BUYING GUIDE: USING TELEGRAM ———————————

2 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈42,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥2 HOURS LEFT!🔥 Remember the guy who bought $12 worth of PEPE and made over $10 million? It's your turn to be the insiders.

2 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈42,800 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥3 HOURS LEFT!🔥 MAX PROFIT TIPS: 1. Ten minutes before 17:00 UTC have RAYDIUM.io and Telegram open. 2. At exactly 17:00 PM GMT, we will send the Contract Address here. 3. After the announcement, you already know what to do (review our pinned guides).

2 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈42,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥6 HOURS LEFT!🔥 You will have 40 minutes to buy before the official launch on Twitter. Over 10 million combined followers will be waiting to buy after you. This is our BIGGEST MOVE. Enjoy. 🌐Read our guides. This will be a 100 million dollar coin, and you will get it before anyone else.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cryptoclubpump. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Pump Club 📈” (@cryptoclubpump), 58,917 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoclubpump.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.