Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYP TO BUZZ 🤑

Channel

CRYP TO BUZZ 🤑

@cryptobuzz01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

296subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002122173927
TypeChannel
Username@cryptobuzz01
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptobuzz01

Growth

296303299.521 August 2026 — 303 subscribers21 August 2026 — 303 subscribers30 August 2026 — 299 subscribers7 September 2026 — 296 subscribers21 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 295–304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:57296-3
30 Aug 2026, 05:16299-4
21 Aug 2026, 20:30303no change
21 Aug 2026, 20:15303first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13651.1%
👍8532.0%
4215.8%
👏31.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 15 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2025, 06:22 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

https://t.me/bybit_en_referralbot?start=6858113985

1

20 Mar 2025, 20:16 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026

t.me/hot_wallet/app?startapp=drop-9064d12173-DnFDnU76pkQvS6paCKpTECFucZ6pyjGsFS3c1U1HopFh

2👍1

1 Feb 2025, 19:19 UTC256 views10 reactionsread 21 August 2026

https://t.me/DurovCapsBot/caps?startapp=7031953648

10

1 Feb 2025, 07:58 UTC243 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026

https://t.me/MidasRWA_bot/app?startapp=ref_07017360-d063-43f5-ba79-51e3b1fa6594

👏3

24 Jan 2025, 20:06 UTC216 views78 reactionsread 21 August 2026

https://t.me/wcoin_tapbot/wcoin_app?startapp=NTYxNjAyNzkxMA==

🔥78

23 Jan 2025, 13:38 UTC196 views57 reactionsread 21 August 2026

t.me/zoo_story_bot/game?startapp=ref5616027910 🥳 Hey, want to visit the Zoo together? 🦒 Here, you can buy animals, upgrade enclosures, and take part in an Airdrop! 🎁 Claim your welcome bonus and pick your first animal!

🔥57

10 Jan 2025, 11:41 UTC194 views11 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Join UXUY Wallet, get 100 UP for free🆓 💰Stand a chance to win future airdrops UXUY Wallet is a Web3 multi-chain decentralized wallet backed by Binance investments. https://t.me/UXUYbot/app?startapp=A_5616027910_inviteEarn

👍92

24 Dec 2024, 05:29 UTC232 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

🟢Instant 10$ - 1000$ Reward 😱 🟢VIP New Kop Airdrop 🟢 ▶️Offer Link : https://t.me/VIP_Airdrop_bot/app?startapp=a6686630-00bc-4f2b-9b73-6d47f8ffaf51 দ্রুত জয়েন করেন ভাইরাল হওয়ার আগেই ভিডিও দেখে ফাস্ট জয়েন করেন 💸 ইনসাআল্লাহ অনেক ভালো কিছু পাবেন 🥰🥰🥰

👍1

18 Dec 2024, 09:40 UTC283 views60 reactionsread 21 August 2026

https://t.me/notpixel/app?startapp=f5616027910_s573790

👍60

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptobuzz01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Airdrop ads
@AirdropSnoopDogg · 147,872
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Airdrops Hunter
@AirdropsHunter_Channel · 53,783
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYP TO BUZZ 🤑” (@cryptobuzz01), 296 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptobuzz01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.