Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Booster 36

Channel

Crypto Booster 36

@cryptobooster36

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

44,938subscribers

-8,635 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835541706
TypeChannel
Username@cryptobooster36
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptobooster36

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

44,93859,49052,2147 August 2026 — 53,573 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,573 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,503 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,056 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,938 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,827 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,685 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,533 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,301 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,188 subscribers19 August 2026 — 52,031 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,891 subscribers21 August 2026 — 51,804 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,355 subscribers24 August 2026 — 51,119 subscribers25 August 2026 — 51,007 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,890 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,775 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,708 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,634 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,544 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,478 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,351 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,292 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,003 subscribers5 September 2026 — 49,836 subscribers8 September 2026 — 49,580 subscribers11 September 2026 — 49,372 subscribers13 September 2026 — 49,139 subscribers14 September 2026 — 49,005 subscribers16 September 2026 — 48,873 subscribers18 September 2026 — 48,709 subscribers25 September 2026 — 48,082 subscribers3 October 2026 — 47,346 subscribers8 October 2026 — 46,986 subscribers12 October 2026 — 46,637 subscribers14 October 2026 — 46,141 subscribers15 October 2026 — 46,053 subscribers16 October 2026 — 45,960 subscribers17 October 2026 — 45,888 subscribers18 October 2026 — 45,821 subscribers19 October 2026 — 45,731 subscribers20 October 2026 — 45,666 subscribers21 October 2026 — 45,577 subscribers22 October 2026 — 45,501 subscribers23 October 2026 — 45,410 subscribers25 October 2026 — 45,329 subscribers25 October 2026 — 45,309 subscribers26 October 2026 — 45,215 subscribers27 October 2026 — 45,159 subscribers29 October 2026 — 45,075 subscribers30 October 2026 — 45,013 subscribers31 October 2026 — 44,938 subscribers7 August 202631 October 2026
54 measurements spanning 84 days, net -8,635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,755–61,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 05:0644,938-75
30 Oct 2026, 06:2845,013-62
29 Oct 2026, 04:0745,075-84
27 Oct 2026, 23:3545,159-56
26 Oct 2026, 22:2745,215-94
25 Oct 2026, 23:5645,309-20
25 Oct 2026, 00:2545,329-81
23 Oct 2026, 22:1545,410-91
22 Oct 2026, 23:1945,501-76
21 Oct 2026, 19:0945,577-89
20 Oct 2026, 16:1745,666-65
19 Oct 2026, 12:5745,731-90
18 Oct 2026, 10:5945,821-67
17 Oct 2026, 10:0645,888-72
16 Oct 2026, 12:2645,960-93
15 Oct 2026, 09:0046,053-88
14 Oct 2026, 09:5846,141-496
12 Oct 2026, 17:2746,637-349
8 Oct 2026, 06:4046,986-360
3 Oct 2026, 21:3847,346first reading

Engagement

876 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.82%
avg views ÷ 44,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
819
328 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.946%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
332
of 876 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 309 of 328 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held876 (5 August 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total268,632
Reactions total2,404
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Oct 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45m 46s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,433 reactions across 797 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,28631.9%
🥴2,24816.7%
😁2,08515.5%
😢1,48211.0%
😭1,44710.8%
👏7185.35%
🔥4153.09%
👍3542.64%
🥰1501.12%
💔830.618%
🤷‍♂440.328%
🍾200.149%
🤝190.141%
😍180.134%
👌170.127%
🫡160.119%
❤‍🔥120.089%
💯70.052%
😘60.045%
🆒30.022%
2 further kinds30.022%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 802 of the 876 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,433 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 876 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 854 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptobooster36. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 876 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2026, 19:14 UTC254 views9 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🌋Mexc Exchange X L2E 💰Get 50 CC ~ 5$ in USD 💲First 10K User 🔥Event Link :- HERE ✅Open Event & Click L2E Banner ✅ Scroll Down & Submit Quiz & Uid ➡️ 2 → A 3 → B 4 → B 5 → A ✅ Done

❤7👏1🔥1

Signed 𝐀𝐥𝐞𝐱

30 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTC424 views19 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Video

Business without investment 😂😂😂😂

😁19

Signed Eloise Daisy

30 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC454 views7 reactionsread 31 October 2026

https://safuagent.vercel.app/ FCFS 2K

😁5❤2

Signed Eloise Daisy

30 Oct 2026, 17:48 UTC451 views16 reactionsread 31 October 2026

Busses korte investment korte Voi lage ? Ba fund nai investment korar ? Business korar idea lagbe free business

😁11🥴3❤2

Signed Eloise Daisy

30 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC856 views3 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🎁Hivecdn 4444 NFT Mint ➡️Link: https://www.hivecdn.xyz/#mint

❤3

30 Oct 2026, 11:24 UTC871 views21 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Jodi apnar amon akta thakto tahole aj apnar biya hoito but apnader nai amon boja gace 😂😂

😁18❤1🔥1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 876 posts we hold for @cryptobooster36. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@cryptobooster36 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Booster 36” (@cryptobooster36), 44,938 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptobooster36.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.