Channel
@cryptoartefaktik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,703subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001019622470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoartefaktik |
| Description | Новости из криптоиндустрии owner @artefaktik |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoartefaktik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 12,703 | -30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 12,733 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 12,747 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 12,757 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 12,772 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 12,785 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 12,807 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 12,817 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 12,826 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 12,826 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 46.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 14.4% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 30 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hyperliquid планирует автоматически возвращать средства пострадавшим пользователям после сбоя в работе API • Компания Hyperliquid заявила, что планирует автоматически вернуть средства пользователям, пострадавшим от сбоя API во вторник, который привёл к задержкам в исполнении сделок. • Компания Hyperliquid устранила проблему с сервером API, которая привела к короткому периоду простоя, подтвердив, что это произошло и…
❤1👍1
США прокладывают путь к “золотому веку” криптоактивов Белый дом опубликовал план развития цифровых активов: акцент на токенизацию, стейблкоины, финансовую доступность и защиту от рисков (включая иностранные CBDC и санкции). Цель — укрепить лидерство США в криптоинновациях. ⚠️ В документе нет ни слова о биткоине как стратегическом резерве, несмотря на активные обсуждения этой идеи в индустрии. Artefaktik
❤1🔥1
✴️#BTC #презентация #крипто некоторые эксперты считают, что BTC сейчас находится в "медвежьей ловушке", а впереди - фаза возобновления оптимизма, далее FOMO и эйфория ————————— в начале декабря Axios со ссылкой на источники в правительстве отмечала, что Трамп хотел бы, чтобы BTC вырос до $150 000 в начале его президентского срока ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social …
😁2⚡1
На медвежьем рынке монеты падают до гораздо более низких значений, чем ты изначально можешь себе представить. По итогу бОльшая часть трейдеров и инвесторов ловят минуса и ликвидации. На бычьем рынке монеты растут до гораздо более высоких значений, чем ты можешь себе представить. По итогу бОльшая часть трейдеров и инвесторов продаёт раньше времени и потом ловит FOMO. Зашло ? Жду 🔥 ———— How to enable translator to r…
👍3❤1🔥1
Я - человек простой, вижу TON ниже 5 баксов - покупаю, выше 6 баксов - продаю👍 ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
👍5
Paradigm считают, что Ethereum надо ускориться в разработке Лидеры венчурной компании Paradigm предложили Ethereum ускориться в разработке, подчеркнув важность достижения максимальной эффективности перед обсуждением дальнейших направлений развития. Они считают, что команда Ethereum должна выпускать как минимум одно крупное обновление ежегодно, чтобы поддерживать сеть в актуальном состоянии. Основное внимание в бли…
👍5❤1🥰1
BlackRock подал заявку на расчёты по своему спотовому BTC-ETF #IBIT в реальных BTC, а не только кэшем. Инвесторы, продав ETF, смогут получать реальные BTC, а не только наличку. ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
👍3👎1🔥1
Разница в поведении небольших розничных Биткоин-инвесторов и более крупных игроков очевидна. Как отмечает руководитель аналитической платформы CryptoQuant Ки Ён Джу, обладатели меньше 1 BTC сейчас преимущественно продают свои монеты, тогда как владельцы больших сумм — покупают. ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
😁2❤1🔥1
✴️#стейблкоины #крипто #USDe USDe от Ethena стал третьим по величине стейблкоином по объему предложения. ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
👍1👎1🔥1
✴️#BTC #крипто #прогноз Сын Трампа, Эрик Трамп, говорит уверен, что BTC вырастет до $1 000 000 ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
👍2❤1🔥1
❓ Древние кошельки продолжают «просыпаться» – майнер из 2013 года перевел 2,700 BTC ($254m) на неизвестный адрес. ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your social media
👍3❤2🔥1
👀 Дональда Трампа призвали помиловать экс-главу Binance и вернуть его к должности CEO криптобиржи! …но Чанпэн Джао написал, что не планирует возвращаться в компанию, но от помилования точно не откажется. ———— How to enable translator to read foreign channels Artefaktik | Boost your TG
👍1🔥1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoartefaktik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 898,108 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto | Artefaktik” (@cryptoartefaktik), 12,703 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoartefaktik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.