Who is interested in a crypto sniper?
🤣6❤1

Channel
@crypto_tradenew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,042subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002107307947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_tradenew |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_tradenew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 2,042 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 2,048 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 2,050 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 2,053 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 2,064 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 2,070 | -11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 2,081 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 2,082 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 36 | 28.3% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 17.3% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 13.4% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 9.45% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 8.66% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_tradenew. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2024 to 26 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Who is interested in a crypto sniper?
🤣6❤1
What do you want to see more in this group?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👏22🥰17🔥14👍12🤩11🤣10❤9
🔍 WazirX Publishes Proof of Reserves After $230M Hack: WazirX has released its Proof of Reserves report following a $230 million hack, aiming to restore user trust and dispel disinformation surrounding the incident. The exchange emphasizes transparency as part of its recovery efforts. 🛡
❤1
Signed 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥_𝟐𝟒𝐡
🛠 Kraken to Launch Ethereum Layer-2 Blockchain 'Ink': Kraken announced Ink, a Layer-2 blockchain on Ethereum to enhance scalability and reduce transaction fees. The move strengthens Kraken’s DeFi initiatives, aiming to make Ethereum transactions faster and more efficient. 🔗
🔥1
Signed 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥_𝟐𝟒𝐡
🌍 Ripple Challenges $125M SEC Fine in Legal Battle: Ripple has filed an appeal to contest the $125 million fine imposed by the SEC. Ripple's legal team argues that the penalty is unwarranted, seeking to redefine XRP's legal status and avoid regulatory setbacks. 📈 @crypto_tradenew
Signed 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥_𝟐𝟒𝐡
📈 Bitcoin ETFs Drive Institutional Interest: Spot Bitcoin ETFs could soon hold over 1 million BTC as institutional demand rises, with market analysts predicting November inflows to further boost Bitcoin's value. Investors remain optimistic about Bitcoin's growth potential in the institutional sector. 📊
Signed 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥_𝟐𝟒𝐡
🌍 Ripple’s XRP Eyes $1 Following Market Recovery: Ripple’s XRP could hit $1 if the U.S. elections result in a positive market reaction. XRP is showing resilience after its 7.6% weekly correction, with analysts pointing to a strong recovery driven by favorable market conditions. 📈
Signed SHahryar 𝟐𝟎:𝟐𝟗
📈 Bitcoin Nears $70,000 Amid Bullish Surge: Bitcoin is closing in on $70,000 as the U.S. election approaches, boosting market sentiment. Investors are flocking to Bitcoin due to concerns over global economic conditions, with traders predicting continued upward momentum. 🚀
Signed SHahryar 𝟐𝟎:𝟐𝟒
🛠 DeFi Protocol Suffers $50M Hack in Latest Exploit: Radiant Capital suffered a significant exploit, with over $50 million stolen. 🛡 The hack has raised concerns about the security of DeFi protocols, emphasizing the need for better risk management and audit measures. 🕵️♂️
Signed SHahryar 𝟏𝟗:𝟒𝟑
🇺🇦 Bitcoin Technical Analysis: BTC Faces Critical Resistance Above $69.5K 🎁 On Oct. 21, 2024, bitcoin is trading at $68,322, supported by a market cap of $1.35 trillion. The cryptocurrency saw a 24-hour trading range between $68,145 and $69,431, with a trading volume reaching $28.79 billion. Technical indicators from multiple time frames present a mixed picture, highlighting crucial entry and exit points for traders
Signed SHahryar 𝟏𝟐:𝟐𝟐
💡 Avalanche Continues to Surge with Ecosystem Developments: Avalanche (AVAX) has gained 20.1%, driven by the successful Avalanche9000 upgrade and a $40 million developer grant. 🔗 New partnerships within the DeFi space are driving AVAX to new highs, making it one of the top-performing assets. 🌟
Signed 𝗔 𝗠 𝗜 𝗥
🌍 Ethereum’s DApp Activity Drops Despite Price Stability: Despite Ethereum's recent price stability 📈, DApp activity on the network has dropped by 23%. This has raised concerns about the sustainability of the network's growth 📉, especially with declining ETF interest. However, Ethereum remains a key player in the DeFi space as developers focus on scalability solutions 🛠️. 💻
Signed SHahryar 𝟏𝟖:𝟓𝟏
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_tradenew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you want to see more in this group?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 26 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoInsider Picks” (@crypto_tradenew), 2,042 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_tradenew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.