16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -10,334. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,557–16,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:18
5,107
-9,750
21 Aug 2026, 05:25
14,857
-9
20 Aug 2026, 02:52
14,866
-106
19 Aug 2026, 00:11
14,972
-90
17 Aug 2026, 21:35
15,062
-31
16 Aug 2026, 21:54
15,093
-24
15 Aug 2026, 17:48
15,117
-17
14 Aug 2026, 06:06
15,134
-222
12 Aug 2026, 21:54
15,356
-4
12 Aug 2026, 00:24
15,360
-15
11 Aug 2026, 03:01
15,375
-4
10 Aug 2026, 05:00
15,379
-41
9 Aug 2026, 07:12
15,420
-7
8 Aug 2026, 07:36
15,427
-14
7 Aug 2026, 16:30
15,441
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:23
15,441
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.5%
avg views ÷ 5,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
23 (21 January 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
9,970
Reactions total
109
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
465 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
237
51.0%
🔥
225
48.4%
🐳
2
0.43%
💩
1
0.215%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нами манипулируют, нас укатывают - и мы всё равно ждём крипто чудо.
В текущей геополитике и новостной сводке пока что тяжело предположить, когда начнется альтсезон.
В это время как альтернативу можно рассмотреть рынок, который существует в любом мировом положении, а текущие новости лишь добавляют волатильности.
Речь про рынок металлов и валют — классический Форекс.
Нет, не кухонная история из 2000-х, а рынок реал…
+5.5k$
Rabby не подтянул ончейн ценник и я решил, что листинг ток на CEX
Загнал на Bitget, а ончейн ценни x3, а Bitget x2.5
Слил уже на Bitget :(
+5.5k$, могло быть +8k$
Если у вас остались $QUID, то сливайте на DEX
🎮TheBeacon анонсировали переход с сети Arbitrum в сеть Abstract и перенос TGE ориентировочно на ноябрь 2026 года, мы ждем выход их токена уже четвертый год, поэтому в целом не сильно критично, подождем еще пару лет💩
Выпрыгнул из лудки с акциями
https://koshiktools.com/spreads?c=hyperliquid~skhxusdt~hyperliquid~skhyusdt
Оставил 1/3 позы на всякий если спред сравняют, пнл -350$
Короче я удивлён, что сейчас очень интересная движуха с FWA от token.works👍
Токен активно торгуется с 30кк мкп и пробивает свой АТХ. Многие уже по тихой делают ресерч, а я уже готов к обороне и к следующим коллекциям которые полетят в пул FWA лудки, бтв добавили сегодня Fwogs, олд коллекцию которая ебануто дала иксов Friendship Bracelets и Crypto Citizens.
• Изменения цен:
Fwogs: 0.03 eth => 0.085 eth
Friendship B…
variational раздал ретроспективно 3кк поинтов, дальше уже с поинтовой программой они +- раздадут еще 6-6.5кк поинтов
risex раздал ретроспективно 1.6кк поинтов, дальше уже с поинтовой программой они +- раздадут еще 10кк-11кк
то есть +- сапплай поинтов одинаковый примерно
но тут вряд ли цена поинтов будет как у вар, потому что подвох в том, что аирдроп будет от rise, а не risex, поэтому вместо привычных 20-25%, я бы…
в целом я еще весной об этом говорил, что на многие перп дексы я забью хуй в июне-июле
так оно и происходит
var я не кручу (органикой только если надо что-то лонгануть или шортануть по рынку)
nado отфармлено
risex скип
treadfi тож
extended
pacifica
bullet
arcus
ondo
perpl
крч почти все скип
вот честно говорю, нет ни одного перп декса, чтоб я сейчас плотно отрабатывал
есть несколько ерли, где я просто тыкаю по мел…
Нравится потенцил проекта от Бонка - $POW
Самый близкий к духу Бонка
Самый близкий из созданных на платформе cirsuc trade к лору RobinHood
Думаю еще увидим возврат к АТХ
0x303c2c6945ed73a4ed46fff5e0b309e78611a07d
👍40🔥36
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @crypto_stop42. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Smile” (@crypto_stop42), 5,107 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_stop42.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.