FIL A similar situation to the asset from the previous post. This is also a high-risk long setup with 0.5% risk. The levels 1.212 – 1.120 will likely provide buying volume, which could trigger a more significant long bounce.
🥰12❤11❤🔥10🔥6

Channel
@crypto_shark_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,725subscribers
-878 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002156491759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_shark_0 |
| Description | Here’s what you can get for free: → My Trading setups → Market analysis 📍Cooperation/Promo ✅ Owner:- @Coach_BTC_0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_shark_0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 30,725 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 30,766 | -52 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 30,818 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 30,834 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 30,875 | -56 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 30,931 | -67 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 30,998 | -60 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 31,058 | -56 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 31,114 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 31,134 | -35 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 31,169 | -29 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 31,198 | -74 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 31,272 | -59 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 31,331 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 31,379 | -42 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 31,421 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 31,462 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 31,491 | -46 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 31,537 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 31,569 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
751 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 210 | 28.0% | |
| ❤ | 207 | 27.6% | |
| 🥰 | 171 | 22.8% | |
| 🔥 | 160 | 21.3% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.266% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.133% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 751reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 26 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
FIL A similar situation to the asset from the previous post. This is also a high-risk long setup with 0.5% risk. The levels 1.212 – 1.120 will likely provide buying volume, which could trigger a more significant long bounce.
🥰12❤11❤🔥10🔥6
For VITRUAL, I’ve set alerts at 0.6749 and 0.6414. These are the price levels where the asset is likely to work through liquidity, and from those levels we have a higher chance of getting a significant long bounce
❤10🔥10🥰10❤🔥8
For now, nothing has changed: I’m still expecting a long bounce higher — either from the current levels or after a manipulative correction like the one we saw on Bitcoin. So I’m continuing to hold both long and short positions. I’ll update you here on anything important. I’ll also let you know here when it’s time to close or partially take profit on the short positions.
❤🔥14❤10🔥7🥰7⚡1
Important news is about to come out. Don’t get scared — during this moment the markets can show strong volatility and manipulations in both directions. After that, we have four days of holidays.
🥰12❤11❤🔥8🔥4
PHB is ready for a low-risk entry at 0.5% with the current price, and I’ll add more if we get a drop and a retest of the inversion level. Entry: Market Limit order: 0.3124 Stop: 0.2672
❤🔥12❤11🔥8🥰4⚡1
I will fix 20% here 💰
❤🔥12❤9🔥8🥰3
COMMON Low risk. It looks very good. You can wait for the formation of a 1H imbalance and pick it up from the trendline retest. Risk: 0.2%
🥰13❤10❤🔥10🔥8
Bitcoin swept 80,000, meaning all the nearest daily liquidity is now taken. SOL reached $120 (I previously showed how important that monthly global level is), so a bounce is also possible. XRP swept the round $2 level — we’ve been waiting for this for a long time, so that’s another hint that the whole market may bounce. If Ethereum doesn’t lose 2800 on a daily close (even if we get a nice wick below) then a bounce t…
❤🔥13❤11🥰8🔥7
Sl to be
🥰13🔥10❤9❤🔥5
🪙 I’m moving my limit order on ETH to 2736 for my position. This message is part of managing the high-risk position. If you’re not in the position: wait for a full setup. I’ll share it when we get confirmations.
❤14❤🔥10🔥9🥰9
Watching MANTA. It’s holding extremely well during this market flush. If the asset returns back into the weekly range, that will show massive strength. Locally I’m ready to work with a small position, and if we get a test of the manipulation zone, I’ll take it with 1% risk from the deposit. Let’s watch how it develops.
❤21❤🔥19🥰15🔥13
I’m fixing 20% of the Pendle position in order to increase my Ethereum position at the $2800 level. For those who don’t need to do this — keep holding the short position. Targets are below $1.5 🐻
🥰13❤🔥11❤10🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_shark_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 617,035 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Zone ࿈” (@crypto_shark_0), 30,725 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_shark_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.