Should we start the channel activity strong? β
- Yes92%
- No8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
β€6

Channel
@crypto_richq
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
6,470subscribers
-335 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244806720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_richq |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_richq |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 6,470 | -50 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 6,520 | -48 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 6,568 | -56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 6,624 | -64 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:54 | 6,688 | -38 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 6,726 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 6,755 | -28 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 6,783 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 6,805 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 6,805 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,771 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯° | 395 | 22.3% | |
| β€ | 373 | 21.1% | |
| π | 273 | 15.4% | |
| π€© | 254 | 14.3% | |
| π₯ | 250 | 14.1% | |
| π | 226 | 12.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Should we start the channel activity strong? β
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
β€6
π Current Trading Signal: Buy: LTC on Binance.com at $99.72 Sell: LTC on lumatrade.exchange at $106.62 Spread: 8.1% π Hereβs how to make it work for you: 1οΈβ£ Buy LTC on Binance.com for $99.72 2οΈβ£ Transfer your LTC to lumatrade.exchange 3οΈβ£ Sell your LTC on for $106.62 4οΈβ£ Withdraw your profit to your wallet! π‘ Why you should act now: The spread is currently 8.1%, which means you could make a solid profit from aβ¦
β€58π37π₯28π14π€©14π₯°13
π₯ Proven profit with signal! Completed the 6th trade today , bringing a solid profit of $17k! π΅
π₯°33β€14π14π12π₯8π€©6
π° Current Prices to Buy LTC: Binance.com: $99.72 Coinbase.com: $98.96 Kraken.com: $98.03 Bybit.com: $98.95 OKX.com: $97.52 πΈ Sell LTC at lumatrade.exchange a Premium: : $106.66
π€©25β€18π12π12π₯9π₯°8
π Act Fast While the Spread Is High! To maximize profits, we recommend buying LTC for the highest amount possible on Binance or your preferred exchange, and then selling it on to lock in your gains. Why scale up? Letβs look at the numbers: β Five trades of $500 each would yield a total profit of just $250 β Five trades of $100,000 each would bring a total profit of $50,000 Seize the moment while the opportunity iβ¦
π₯°28π₯16π13β€12π9π€©4
π₯π₯π₯ LTC Arbitrage Scheme We're currently seeing an 9.4% price difference on Litecoin (LTC) between Binance.com and . This is a fantastic opportunity to enhance your trading strategy! π π₯Hereβs How to Capitalize on This Opportunity: π΅ Buy Litecoin (LTC) Head to Binance.com (or your chosen exchange) and purchase LTC using your available funds. π’ Transfer LTC Move your LTC from your Binance.com account to your lumatβ¦
β€22π₯18π17π€©15π11π₯°11
β‘οΈWelcome back, everyone! After a refreshing break, Iβm back and ready to dive into the crypto market with renewed energy. In just 15 minutes, Iβll be sharing a new profitable arbitrage bundle with you. π As many of you know, I sold my Bitcoin at $95,000 not long ago, and now, it's reached an all-time high of $99,000! While Iβm glad to have made a solid profit, remember that the market is dynamic, and opportunitiesβ¦
π₯°29π12β€9π8π₯7π€©7
Are you ready guys? π€
π₯°18β€15π€©13π₯11π7π6
Video message, posted without a caption
π₯°29β€21π10π₯10π9π€©4
Guess who's back? π
π₯°24β€14π11π9π₯9π€©9
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯42π38β€31π€©18π17π₯°13
I finally decided to sell my 7 BTC that I bought a year ago ! It's still a very high selling price BTC selling price on - $95,819
β€31π₯°18π15π11π€©9π₯7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_richq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we start the channel activity strong? β
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 6 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β800% Profit Signals π¬β (@crypto_richq), 6,470 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_richq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.