💰 100.000 💰💰💰💰

Channel
Crypto Pills
@crypto_pills
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,082subscribers
-68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001776242739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_pills |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_pills |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 4,082 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 4,090 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 4,096 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 4,106 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 4,116 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 4,125 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 4,129 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 4,136 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 4,142 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 4,146 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4,150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 4,150 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Ehy Cryptopills, we are back! 👋 Long time no see! Cryptopills has taken a break to find ways to sustain itself so that it can continue to bring you quality content, such as out daily updates and various weekly reports ( see #TokenReports, #Investigations, and #WeeklyAlpha). These are the result of a lot of research and effort and the support of several well-chosen contributors who help to keep you informed about al…
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 coming for Crypto Pills in the next few hours! Be on the lookout 😮
52 and thriving! Happy birthday, Dima 🥳
If you feel like you are missing Crypto Pills, you probably didn’t notice that we have temporarily moved the conversation to Crypto Talk, our community group. Join here! 1️⃣
💰 BTC ETFs flows May, 07 GBTC: -$28.6m 📉 Fidelity: +$4.1m ARKB: +$2.8m BTCO: +$6.0m BlackRock, Bitwise, EZBC, HODL, BTCW, BRRR: +$0m ➡️ Netflow: -$15.7m GBTC flows turned negative again Join 😛😝😜🤪🤨🧐 chat group, Where you can always find us discussing market events 😘 🙌 There, I post many articles, tweets and other interesting content about daily happenings in crypto!
👀 FTX Files Consensus-Based Plan of Reorganization: PRNEWSWIRE (court has yet to approve the plan!) - FTX forecasts that the total value of property collected, converted to cash and available for distribution will be between $14.5 and $16.3 billion - The Plan contemplates payment in full of all non-governmental creditors based on the value of their claims as determined by the Bankruptcy Court (11 Nov 2022). - T. B…
Today, however, after so many postponements of the various ETH Spot ETF proposals slowly as we approach the final deadline of VanEck's on May 23, Grayscale decided to withdraw its ETH Futures ETF proposal that it had filed in December 2023 after the SEC in October approved several ETH Futures ETFs. James Seyffart, in the past, pointed to this ETF Futures as a Trojan horse to allow, should it be approved, to provide …
We are getting closer and closer to the May 23 deadline for 🔹 Ethereum Spot ETFs. Some thoughts: - The likely denial of ETH ETFs has been widely accepted by the market, which has suppressed ethereum's price in recent months. Now, the market's "agreement" that it will be denied has slowly led to a switch in the denial consensus from “sell the news” to “buy the news”: the market now wants to long the denial. Predictin…
https://twitter.com/vydamo_/status/1787603244459655203 Here is an example of 💰 LayerZero's snitch2earn campaign People threatened to be snitched and lose their airdrop eligibility 😄 At least, however, we got some positive news from LayerZero CEO: LayerZero labs employee is 100% restricted from claiming and has no eligibility
💰 LayerZero proceeds with its airdrop snitch2earn campaign (get 10% of the tokens that the sybil farmer you report would have received), announcing that it will be aided by Chaos Labs and Nansen to locate large clusters of farmers https://twitter.com/LayerZero_Labs/status/1787608904177746004 Mixed feelings here Sure, eliminating sybil farmers is good for those who use Stargate or LayerZero's other products legitima…
💰 BTC ETFs flows May, 06 2nd consecutive (and 2nd ever) GBTC inflow: +$3.9m Blackrock: +$21.5m Fidelity: +$99.2m BITB: +$2.1m ARKB: +$75.6m BTCO: +$11.1m EZBC: +$1.8m HODL: +$1.8m Netflow: +$217m 📈
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crypto_pills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CoinBureau · 117,488
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Pills” (@crypto_pills), 4,082 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_pills.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.