Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Oborona En

Channel

Crypto Oborona En

@crypto_oborona_en

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52,172subscribers

-12,179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194386594
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_oborona_en
DescriptionA channel about how to save funds earned in crypto. Channel chat - @crypto_chatting_en Main group - @crypto_oborona (Ru)
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_oborona_en

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

52,17264,35158,261.56 August 20269 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 95 days, net -12,179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,345–66,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 04:0052,172-323
7 Nov 2026, 20:3952,495-125
6 Nov 2026, 19:2052,620-259
5 Nov 2026, 18:1652,879-154
4 Nov 2026, 21:3653,033-220
3 Nov 2026, 20:4553,253-151
2 Nov 2026, 19:4653,404-102
1 Nov 2026, 18:5153,506-224
31 Oct 2026, 22:1753,730-106
31 Oct 2026, 01:2653,836-224
29 Oct 2026, 23:1654,060-159
29 Oct 2026, 01:2854,219-223
27 Oct 2026, 22:3954,442-273
26 Oct 2026, 18:5854,715-166
25 Oct 2026, 20:3654,881-79
24 Oct 2026, 19:2854,960-166
23 Oct 2026, 17:1155,126-123
22 Oct 2026, 16:1655,249-183
21 Oct 2026, 09:2055,432-163
20 Oct 2026, 06:3955,595first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.125%
avg views ÷ 52,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held28 (27 March 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total196
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
171
Videos
64
Links
357

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6238.0%
🤝6036.8%
🔥1811.0%
🤔148.59%
❤‍🔥74.29%
💯21.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_oborona_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026

This post looks like it’s about AI, but stick around: at the end there’s TON and a deal you’ll help me green-light 😏 🎂 My birthday was a month and a half ago, yet it feels like yesterday. Time flies, and the culprit is LLMs: for the past year I’ve been falling deeper and deeper down that rabbit hole. It’s like a casino in there: no windows, no clocks. Figured you might enjoy a peek at what I’ve learned. 🦖 Backstory…

🤝3❤‍🔥1👍1🤔1

13 Oct 2026, 19:37 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026

I recently found out that grants for creative people are being handed out in TON. I asked the Nothing team where their money for these artist grants comes from. Here’s what I found out. ℹ️ Nothing is an independent media project around artists that grew out of the Notcoin ecosystem. They run a fund where patrons vote on which projects get money. It’s funded by patron subscriptions and 30% of every sale in their mark…

🔥2🤔1

13 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC68 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026

It’s been a while since I wrote about free activities 🤔 There aren’t many of them, but they do exist. The xRocket team still supports xJourney. Basically, it’s a bonus points system where you get points for literally everything, including a free check-in. I first wrote about it back in summer 2025, and despite the general mood, they keep actively developing 🔥 ℹ️ These points are used to raffle off pretty solid priz…

👍7🔥3💯2

9 Sept 2026, 19:40 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Blockchain Life is returning to Dubai on December 1–2, 2026! Only 3 months left until one of the biggest crypto events of the year. ℹ️ The event is expected to bring together 15,000+ attendees from 130+ countries, 200+ speakers, and 200+ sponsors. Once again, they’ll all gather at one of the largest crypto forums in the world. Blockchain Life will bring together crypto industry leaders from all over the globe in Dub…

👍3❤‍🔥1🔥1🤔1

9 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC81 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026

The time has come to wrap things up 🔥 Earlier, I even gave you a couple of extra days so you could make it in time. Those who made it, made it 😏 Here’s the final list: 1. 🥇 3744 @radical_optim1sm Screenshot ✅ 2. 🥈 3655 @stopf1rmovich Screenshot +/- 3. 🥉 3445 @volkovigor Screenshot +/- 4. 3045 @AIG0R Screenshot ✅ 5. 2496 @kirlion83 Screenshot ✅ 6. 2262 @T8_8_8 Screenshot ✅ 7. 2142 @volkovkostyak Screenshot ✅ …

🤝4👍1🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026

The developers of Pixel World are actively improving the game, so I decided to support their progress with a little contest for my subscribers 😏 🤔 I spent a long time thinking about the rules and decided to keep things as simple as possible: Whoever scores the most points in a single game wins. It doesn’t matter which mode you play, whether you’re in a squad, or what loadout you use. The only thing that matters is y…

🤝4🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Pavel Durov has filed an application to obtain the .gram domain extension. The news is definitely positive. However, there’s an important nuance: the process of obtaining such a domain extension is extremely lengthy. The process roughly looks like this: Application → public disclosure → reviews/objections → technical and organizational evaluation → possible domain dispute → contract with ICANN → technical onboardin…

🤝3

8 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

You previously showed some great support with reactions to this post on ⚡️ Tonus, so I finally got around to looking into it as well. So, lately, LLMs (what many people simply call AI) have been on everyone’s radar. These days, if a product doesn’t mention AI somewhere, it almost feels like it has neither innovation nor relevance. And without those, attracting investment naturally becomes harder. Entrepreneurs, inv…

🤝5👍1🔥1🤔1

13 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026

I was genuinely surprised by the MRKT team. Not because of how they handled the exploit—that part actually looked pretty reasonable. They locked the assets → investigated the incident → compensated over $600k → and then unlocked everything. ℹ️ What caught me off guard was their decision to shut down the sticker and in-game item marketplace. Yes, the NFT market is nowhere near as hyped as it used to be. But Telegram …

🤝4👍1🤔1

8 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

This winter there’ll be another great reason to make a trip to Dubai. ℹ️ On December 1–2, Blockchain Life 2026 will take place there. It’s one of the largest conferences dedicated to crypto, Web3, and AI. The organizers expect 15,000+ attendees from more than 130 countries, 200+ speakers, and a dedicated track focused on artificial intelligence. ➡️ At events like this, what interests me most isn’t the talks themsel…

👍3🔥1🤔1🤝1

24 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026

While mTONga remains relatively quiet, other services have started taking the lead when it comes to community activities. 🏴 DTrade They've launched a trading competition with a $5,000 prize pool. It actually looks quite attractive, especially given the current state of the TON ecosystem. The concept is simple: ▫️ Trade through the bot ▫️ Every 50 GRAM 😏 in volume = 1 ticket ▫️ Any token counts ▫️ Trading fee is onl…

🤝4🤔1

12 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC105 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Looking at the market right now, I don't see much reason for optimism. 🚀 SpaceX is set to go public tomorrow. This company could absorb liquidity from many risk assets. A lot of people may be willing to sell crypto, stocks, and other investments just to get a piece of this unicorn. On top of that, NASDAQ has reportedly adjusted its rules to allow SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI to join the index. The same index that c…

🤝5

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @crypto_oborona_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Oborona En” (@crypto_oborona_en), 52,172 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_oborona_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.