Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -4,888. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,730–65,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:18
59,463
-301
16 Sept 2026, 14:19
59,764
-147
14 Sept 2026, 20:20
59,911
-188
13 Sept 2026, 08:16
60,099
-319
11 Sept 2026, 10:21
60,418
-289
8 Sept 2026, 20:18
60,707
-634
5 Sept 2026, 11:15
61,341
-270
3 Sept 2026, 10:28
61,611
-158
2 Sept 2026, 05:54
61,769
-218
1 Sept 2026, 02:45
61,987
-64
31 Aug 2026, 05:18
62,051
-176
30 Aug 2026, 06:43
62,227
-137
29 Aug 2026, 10:13
62,364
-42
28 Aug 2026, 12:15
62,406
-119
27 Aug 2026, 12:42
62,525
-29
26 Aug 2026, 15:34
62,554
-75
25 Aug 2026, 14:52
62,629
-77
24 Aug 2026, 16:45
62,706
-176
23 Aug 2026, 03:23
62,882
-115
21 Aug 2026, 15:48
62,997
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.063%
avg views ÷ 59,463 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
25 (27 March 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
75
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 03:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
171
Videos
64
Links
354
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 25 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤝
57
40.1%
👍
54
38.0%
🔥
13
9.15%
🤔
12
8.45%
❤🔥
6
4.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_oborona_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Blockchain Life is returning to Dubai on December 1–2, 2026! Only 3 months left until one of the biggest crypto events of the year.
ℹ️ The event is expected to bring together 15,000+ attendees from 130+ countries, 200+ speakers, and 200+ sponsors. Once again, they’ll all gather at one of the largest crypto forums in the world. Blockchain Life will bring together crypto industry leaders from all over the globe in Dub…
The time has come to wrap things up 🔥
Earlier, I even gave you a couple of extra days so you could make it in time. Those who made it, made it 😏 Here’s the final list:
1. 🥇 3744 @radical_optim1sm Screenshot ✅
2. 🥈 3655 @stopf1rmovich Screenshot +/-
3. 🥉 3445 @volkovigor Screenshot +/-
4. 3045 @AIG0R Screenshot ✅
5. 2496 @kirlion83 Screenshot ✅
6. 2262 @T8_8_8 Screenshot ✅
7. 2142 @volkovkostyak Screenshot ✅
…
The developers of Pixel World are actively improving the game, so I decided to support their progress with a little contest for my subscribers 😏
🤔 I spent a long time thinking about the rules and decided to keep things as simple as possible:
Whoever scores the most points in a single game wins.
It doesn’t matter which mode you play, whether you’re in a squad, or what loadout you use. The only thing that matters is y…
Pavel Durov has filed an application to obtain the .gram domain extension.
The news is definitely positive. However, there’s an important nuance: the process of obtaining such a domain extension is extremely lengthy. The process roughly looks like this:
Application → public disclosure → reviews/objections → technical and organizational evaluation → possible domain dispute → contract with ICANN → technical onboardin…
You previously showed some great support with reactions to this post on ⚡️ Tonus, so I finally got around to looking into it as well.
So, lately, LLMs (what many people simply call AI) have been on everyone’s radar. These days, if a product doesn’t mention AI somewhere, it almost feels like it has neither innovation nor relevance. And without those, attracting investment naturally becomes harder.
Entrepreneurs, inv…
I was genuinely surprised by the MRKT team. Not because of how they handled the exploit—that part actually looked pretty reasonable. They locked the assets → investigated the incident → compensated over $600k → and then unlocked everything.
ℹ️ What caught me off guard was their decision to shut down the sticker and in-game item marketplace. Yes, the NFT market is nowhere near as hyped as it used to be. But Telegram …
This winter there’ll be another great reason to make a trip to Dubai.
ℹ️ On December 1–2, Blockchain Life 2026 will take place there. It’s one of the largest conferences dedicated to crypto, Web3, and AI. The organizers expect 15,000+ attendees from more than 130 countries, 200+ speakers, and a dedicated track focused on artificial intelligence.
➡️ At events like this, what interests me most isn’t the talks themsel…
While mTONga remains relatively quiet, other services have started taking the lead when it comes to community activities.
🏴 DTrade
They've launched a trading competition with a $5,000 prize pool. It actually looks quite attractive, especially given the current state of the TON ecosystem. The concept is simple:
▫️ Trade through the bot
▫️ Every 50 GRAM 😏 in volume = 1 ticket
▫️ Any token counts
▫️ Trading fee is onl…
Looking at the market right now, I don't see much reason for optimism.
🚀 SpaceX is set to go public tomorrow. This company could absorb liquidity from many risk assets. A lot of people may be willing to sell crypto, stocks, and other investments just to get a piece of this unicorn. On top of that, NASDAQ has reportedly adjusted its rules to allow SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI to join the index. The same index that c…
Exactly 5 years ago, the TON testnet (then called NewTON) became the main network 🔥
ℹ️ Back then, many developers received a pleasant bonus. Their testnet tokens suddenly gained real value. The history of Pavel Durov’s Gram coin began even earlier, but May 26 is generally considered TON’s birthday.
➡️ This year, TF was finally removed, and Durov has now directly linked himself and Telegram to TON. No matter how you…
TON is coming back to life - and not just for regular TON users
👉 In just one week, three major stories made waves:
🎭 PepekTON scam. The presale raised around $44k. Only half of it was added to liquidity. The rest was withdrawn directly through an exchange service. Not everyone received their tokens, and the listing launched at roughly -10x compared to the entry price. The admins deleted chats and posts afterward. …
Positive developments in progress
ℹ️ Back in late 2025, I saw news that several new developers had joined TON Core. At the time, it wasn’t entirely clear what exactly they were working on. Now the results are becoming visible: blockchain acceleration and a whole set of tools aimed at simplifying smart contract development.
The new product Action (built on top of TolkFmt) added:
▫️ Debugger
▫️ Skills for LLMs
▫️ A w…
👍5❤🔥1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @crypto_oborona_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Oborona En” (@crypto_oborona_en), 59,463 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_oborona_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.