Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Новости

@crypto_newss123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,149subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002163703048
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_newss123
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_newss123

Growth

1,1491,1581,153.57 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,153 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,149 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,148–1,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:141,149-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:021,153-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:341,157no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:531,157-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:471,158first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 1,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,129
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6854.0%
🔥1511.9%
👍118.73%
🆒97.14%
🤔97.14%
👏53.97%
😡53.97%
😁21.59%
🤯21.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC333 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Step App завершает работу Step App объявила о закрытии и отключит все сервисы 21 августа. 📉 Пользователям советуют вывести стейкинг и пересмотреть позиции на биржах. FITFI уже упал на 99,9% от своего исторического максимума.

4🔥3🆒2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC334 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Binance требует $473 млн с RedotPay Аффилированные с Binance компании подали иск к RedotPay в Гонконге из-за переманивания более 470000 пользователей. 📊 Binance оценила ущерб в 472,8 млн долларов и считает, что это усилило оценку RedotPay перед IPO. RedotPay отвергает претензии и заявляет, что спор не повлияет на её работу.

3🆒3👍1

2 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC341 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Биткоин теряет импульс Биткоин откатился к $62500–$63000 после неудачи выше $64500–$65000. 📊 ФРС сохранила ставку, а сильный доллар и доходности усилили давление на крипторынок. При пробое поддержки рынок может быстро уйти к $61000 и даже $60000.

4👍2🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC353 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Коровы стали цифровым залогом B3 в Бразилии оформила первый кредит под залог токенизированного скота на 100 тысяч реалов. 📊 Смарт-ошейники заменили выездные проверки и дали банкам данные о здоровье и местоположении животных. Токенизация скота может упростить фермерам доступ к капиталу и снизить риск двойного залога.

4👍1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC357 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Иск против соучредителей BitMEX Бывшие клиенты BitMEX подали коллективный иск в Нью-Йорке, обвинив биржу и Артура Хейса в мошенничестве. 📉 Истцы заявили о скрытой торговле против пользователей и манипулировании ликвидациями на платформе. Истцы требуют вернуть 623 BTC, а иск совпал с объявлением о закрытии BitMEX.

3

23 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC346 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Биткоин откатился от локального пика Биткоин снизился после роста выше $66000, несмотря на шестой день притока в спотовые ETF США. 📊 Чистый приток в ETF составил около $203 млн, но этого пока мало после крупных майских и июньских оттоков. Геополитика и дорогая нефть могут снова усилить давление на рисковые активы.

3🆒1

22 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC350 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ BIS бьет тревогу о стейблкоинах BIS заявил, что долларовые стейблкоины обходят банки и усложняют контроль капитала для властей. 📊 Исследование охватило более 130 стран и связало приток стейблкоинов с кризисами и девальвацией. Использование цифровых долларов растет, и регуляторам придется срочно обновлять правила.

3👍1🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC357 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Knaken признали банкротом в Нидерландах Суд Роттердама признал Knaken банкротом после исчезновения 8,2 млн долларов клиентских средств. 📉 Прокуратура начала уголовное расследование, а у платформы не было лицензии на криптоуслуги. Возврат средств клиентам остается под большим вопросом.

4👍2🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC358 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Polygon Labs снова сокращает штат Polygon Labs начала новый раунд увольнений на финальном этапе покупки Coinme. 💳 Компания меняет фокус с блокчейн-инфраструктуры на платежные решения и целится в прибыль к 2027 году. Это уже второе сокращение за полгода на фоне большой перестройки бизнеса.

3🤔3

14 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC358 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 NEAR держится лучше рынка NEAR сохраняет устойчивость на слабом крипторынке и улучшает ончейн-метрики. 📊 За сутки сеть обработала 694000 транзакций, а в июне привлекла более 500000 новых адресов. При удержании выше $2,00 токен может восстановиться быстрее рынка.

5🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC351 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Ripple идет в платежи для ИИ Ripple поддержала стандарт x402 для автоматических платежей ИИ-агентов за цифровые услуги. 📊 Компания продвигает RLUSD как основной долларовый актив для микроплатежей в XRP Ledger. Если рынок вырастет, Ripple может занять важное место в экономике машинных платежей.

4😁2🆒1

10 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC352 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔐 Tangem уличили в уязвимости Ledger Donjon выявила в кошельках Tangem уязвимость для сброса пароля карты. ⚠️ Tangem заявила, что атака требует дорогой лаборатории, физического доступа и редкой экспертизы. Уязвимость нельзя исправить обновлением, потому что карты не поддерживают прошивку.*

4🤔2🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_newss123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,410,199 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Новости” (@crypto_newss123), 1,149 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_newss123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.