Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Крипто Новости

Channel

Крипто Новости

@crypto_news_novosti

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,055subscribers

-633 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541695830
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_news_novosti
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_news_novosti

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

15.7 average views per post against 13,055 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.12%. Across the 15,742 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.62% and 17.7%, with a median of 9.03%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured29 of 29 published in the window (29 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled455
Mature posts only0.126% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,055 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 15,742 channels · p10 2.35% · p25 4.62% · p50 9.03% · p75 17.7% · p90 30.3%
Position in cohort0.273th percentile · 1/77 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.221% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,05513,68813,371.513 August 2026 — 13,688 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,671 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,633 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,600 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,570 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,559 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,545 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,531 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,505 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,479 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,460 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,442 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,418 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,403 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,382 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,367 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,343 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,325 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,306 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,278 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,248 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,185 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,148 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,124 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,105 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,080 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,055 subscribers13 August 202618 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 37 days, net -633. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,960–13,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:3913,055-25
16 Sept 2026, 17:2113,080-25
15 Sept 2026, 00:0113,105-19
13 Sept 2026, 12:0113,124-24
11 Sept 2026, 18:0013,148-37
9 Sept 2026, 05:3913,185-63
5 Sept 2026, 22:0113,248-30
3 Sept 2026, 20:5813,278-28
2 Sept 2026, 12:4713,306-19
1 Sept 2026, 15:0813,325-18
31 Aug 2026, 12:5513,343-24
30 Aug 2026, 13:5513,367-15
29 Aug 2026, 11:3613,382-21
28 Aug 2026, 14:0813,403-15
27 Aug 2026, 17:3613,418-24
26 Aug 2026, 14:4913,442-18
25 Aug 2026, 11:5313,460-19
24 Aug 2026, 14:1513,479-26
22 Aug 2026, 18:5813,505-26
21 Aug 2026, 09:2813,531first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.12%
avg views ÷ 13,055 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.7
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held103 (8 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total455
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTC7 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊 Розничные инвесторы перестали быть «шумом». По данным крупнейших брокеров, доля частных лиц в общем объёме торгов на Московской бирже в начале 2026 года впервые превысила 82%. Это не просто цифра: именно розница сейчас задаёт волатильность в акциях средней капитализации, а институциональные инвесторы вынуждены подстраивать свои алгоритмы под поведение толпы. Что дальше: брокеры уже тестируют инструменты «социальной…

2 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC12 viewsread 2 September 2026

Знакомый фрилансер-разработчик держал сервис по приёму платежей в крипте. Оборот — около $50 000 в месяц, но на комиссиях в сети Ethereum он терял до $300–500 ежедневно. Клиенты тоже ныли: переводы на $200 уходили в минус из-за газа. Дошло до того, что несколько крупных заказчиков ушли к конкурентам, которые принимали USDT в Tron. Он не стал бросать Ethereum, а подключил сайдчейн Polygon. Шаги были простые: создал к…

2 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC20 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📉 Открой старший таймфрейм. Убедись, что максимумы и минимумы понижаются — это структура тренда. Без нее шорт — лотерея. Жди отката вверх к сопротивлению или средней. Не входи сразу после пробоя вниз, цена почти всегда возвращается к уровню. 🎯 Входи после подтверждения: свеча закрывается ниже минимума отката. Продавцы снова в деле. Закрытие выше — отмена, жди следующий откат. Стоп ставь за локальный максимум. Цена д…

1 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC23 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚡️ Один предприниматель из Иркутска открыл майнинг-отель на 200 стоек. Первые три месяца казались успехом: загрузка 60%, клиенты платили. Но потом начался ад — каждую неделю кто-то обвинял его в поломке своих ASIC. Один клиент даже требовал компенсацию за «сгоревший» блок питания, хотя сам подключил его через удлинитель. 🔧 Вместо того чтобы спорить, он сделал три вещи. Первое: повесил умные счётчики на каждую стойку…

1 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥 Горячий кошелёк — MetaMask, Trust Wallet или аналог. Бесплатно, настройка за 5 минут, всё в браузере или телефоне. Работает для ежедневных переводов, мелких сумм и DeFi-операций. Не подходит для крупных сбережений: приватный ключ хранится на устройстве, которое подключено к интернету, — риск взлома и фишинга. 🔒 Холодное хранение — аппаратный кошелёк вроде Ledger или Trezor. Платно, требует настройки и привыкания. …

1 Sept 2026, 06:47 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026

Вопрос, который я хочу задать сегодня, звучит кощунственно для любого инвестора: а так ли страшен медвежий рынок, как его малюют, и не является ли он на самом деле единственным честным перераспределением капитала? Обычно все делятся на два лагеря. Первые, уверенные в себе, скажут: «Медвежий рынок — это время возможностей. Вся моя прибыль была заработана именно на панике. Покупай, когда кровь на улицах». Они правы, п…

31 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚡ Майнинг-фермы снова в центре спора: кто-то называет их пассивным доходом, кто-то — дорогой лотереей. Ответ зависит от тарифов, курса и терпения — а что думаете вы? 💬 Стоит ли собирать свою майнинг-ферму в 2026-м? Да, стоит, потому что при дешёвой электроэнергии (до 5₽ за кВт) ферма окупается за 8–10 месяцев, а дальше это чистый доход без моего участия. Нет, но если у вас нет льготного тарифа и нормального охлажд…

31 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC22 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🧠 «Симулякр — это не то, что скрывает истину, а то, что скрывает, что истины нет». Жан Бодрийяр, «Симулякры и симуляция», 1981. 📉 Почему это важно сейчас: рынок NFT схлопнулся, и стало очевидно — большинство коллекций были не искусством и не инвестицией, а знаками принадлежности. Люди покупали не картинку, а иллюзию статуса. Бодрийяр предсказал это задолго до крипты: мы потребляем не вещи, а их симуляцию. И сегодня …

31 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC16 viewsread 2 September 2026

Все думают, что боковик — это тихая гавань. Мол, рынок не падает и не растет, значит, ничего не теряешь. Сиди себе и жди у моря погоды. 🏝️ На самом деле это ловушка. Боковик — это не пауза, а скрытая утечка денег. Пока цена стоит на месте, инфляция и альтернативная доходность (например, ставка по вкладу в 15%) каждый день делают твой портфель беднее. Но главная проблема в другом. Миф: раз цена не падает, я ничего н…

30 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вся суть блокчейна — убрать необходимость доверия. Виталик Бутерин Эта цитата звучит как вызов, когда речь заходит о централизованных биржах. Мы храним активы на CEX, потому что так удобно. Но удобство — это и есть доверие чужой системе. После краха FTX и череды банкротств стало очевидно: биржа — это не банк, а её обещания — не гарантии. Почему это важно сейчас: рынок растёт, и новые пользователи снова несут деньги…

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @crypto_news_novosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPSC Ethics by VK IAS
@Upsc_ethics_notes · 44,443
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крипто Новости” (@crypto_news_novosti), 13,055 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_news_novosti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.