Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КриптоЛИДЕР

Channel

КриптоЛИДЕР

@crypto_liders

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,870subscribers

-916 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002797872657
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_liders
DescriptionНаш бот @project_manager_support_bot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_liders

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

30.8 average views per post against 13,870 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.222%. Across the 25,128 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.66% and 23.0%, with a median of 11.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (29 July 2026 28 August 2026)
Posts measured31 of 31 published in the window (31 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled954
Mature posts only0.228% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,870 measured 28 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 25,128 channels · p10 2.87% · p25 5.66% · p50 11.6% · p75 23.0% · p90 41.3%
Position in cohort0.565th percentile · 1/53 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 28 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,87014,78614,3286 August 2026 — 14,786 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,545 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,442 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,399 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,357 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,317 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,282 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,261 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,243 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,192 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,082 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,071 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,026 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,986 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,940 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,900 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,888 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,881 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,870 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -916. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,733–14,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 12:1313,870-11
27 Aug 2026, 15:2513,881-7
26 Aug 2026, 14:2413,888-12
25 Aug 2026, 12:5213,900-40
24 Aug 2026, 12:1213,940-46
22 Aug 2026, 21:4213,986-40
21 Aug 2026, 08:1614,026-9
20 Aug 2026, 09:4614,035-25
19 Aug 2026, 09:4814,060-11
18 Aug 2026, 12:3714,071-11
17 Aug 2026, 14:3814,082-110
16 Aug 2026, 08:5314,192-51
14 Aug 2026, 20:1614,243-18
13 Aug 2026, 14:3814,261-21
12 Aug 2026, 12:4814,282-35
11 Aug 2026, 09:1414,317-40
10 Aug 2026, 09:5014,357-42
9 Aug 2026, 06:4714,399-43
8 Aug 2026, 04:2614,442-103
7 Aug 2026, 04:4014,545first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.222%
avg views ÷ 13,870 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.8
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held43 (14 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total954
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
297
Videos
6
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1869.2%
🔥830.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC5 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Проблема не в том, что ты "не угадал свечу". Проблема - что ты входишь без сценария. Я держу один уровень и три плана: пробой / отскок / флэт. Практичный вывод: заранее пропиши для каждого плана триггер входа, уровень ошибки (стоп) и что должно случиться, чтобы не входить. Если триггера нет - сделки нет. Когда это не работает: на новостных импульсах, в тонкой ликвидности и когда ты двигаешь стоп "чтобы не выбило"

27 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC10 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я не ищу "секретный индикатор". Мне хватает 5 инструментов: TradingView, алерты, уровни, дневник сделок и один рабочий сетап. Тезис: чем меньше кнопок - тем меньше поводов нарушать план. Контртезис: без дисциплины этот минимализм превращается в "я и так всё помню". Практичный вывод: на TradingView размечай 2–3 ключевых уровня, ставь алерты на подход/пробой, а вход делай только по своему сетапу. После сделки - 3 стр

26 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC9 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

TradingView, алерты, уровни и дневник - это не "грааль", а способ убрать импровизацию. Я делаю так: отмечаю 2–3 ключевых уровня, ставлю алерты на подход/пробой, заранее держу один рабочий сетап и после сделки фиксирую в дневнике причину входа, стоп как уровень ошибки и результат - чтобы не "додумывать" задним числом. Практичный вывод: меньше инструментов, но жёстче процесс: уровень → алерт → сетап → запись. Когда не

25 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC16 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я перестал верить в "плечо решает, если уверен". Уверенность не считается - считается просадка в цифрах. Я считаю так: сначала допустимая просадка по счёту на день/неделю, потом риск на сделку (в деньгах), и только после этого - размер позиции. Плечо здесь вторично: оно просто ускоряет, как прибыль, так и ошибку. Стоп обязателен, если сделка с плечом, если вход "по рынку" в движении, и если ликвидность тонкая - без

24 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC17 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ты не ищешь "индикатор". Ты ищешь систему, которая не разваливается на шуме. Я держу базовый набор инструментов: TradingView для контекста, алерты вместо постоянного мониторинга, уровни как точки принятия решения, дневник сделок как контроль дисциплины и один рабочий сетап, который повторяю, а не "изобретаю" каждый день. Скепсис простой: чем больше кнопок - тем легче оправдать плохой вход. Практичный вывод: один се

23 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC18 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос: как посчитать риск-менеджмент в цифрах, а не "по ощущениям"? Я держу простое правило: макс. просадка по дню/неделе заранее, риск на сделку фиксированный, а размер позиции считаю от стопа, а не от "хочу заработать". Практичный вывод: если стоп 1% от цены и я готов потерять 0,5% депозита - беру позицию на 50% депо (без плеча); плечо - это только способ увеличить позицию, не меняя риск в деньгах. Стоп обязателен

22 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC18 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Q: Что такое самокастодия и безопасность в Telegram - по-простому? A: Это когда доступ к деньгам держишь ты: сид‑фраза живёт офлайн, а Telegram - место, где чаще всего пытаются выманить доступ через "поддержку/airdrop/верификацию". Практичный вывод: раздели точки риска: сид не храню в облаке/заметках/скринах и никому не ввожу; для кошелька - отдельное устройство/профиль, для чатов - отдельный Telegram; любые ссылки

21 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC21 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

TradingView, алерты, уровни, дневник и один рабочий сетап - я год использовал это "как будто", а не как систему. Я перестал искать идеальный индикатор и начал исполнять один сценарий. Практичный вывод: заранее ставь алерты на уровни и записывай в дневник триггер входа / стоп / выход. Если хотя бы одного пункта нет - сделки нет. Когда не работает: на новостных импульсах, в тонкой ликвидности и если ты меняешь сетап к

20 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC15 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

FOMO, revenge-trading и "пересидеть" ломают депозит не разовой ошибкой, а тем, что ты начинаешь торговать эмоцию вместо сценария. Практичный вывод: перед входом у меня три фильтра: сценарий (что должно случиться), уровень ошибки (где стоп без переносов) и фиксированный риск (одинаковый %/сделку); если одного нет - сделки нет. Когда это не работает: если ты двигаешь стоп "чтобы не выбило", увеличиваешь объём после м

19 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ты не обязан угадывать свечу. Твоя работа - заранее выбрать сценарий и исполнить его. Я держу только три: пробой / отскок / флэт - и заранее знаю, где признаю ошибку. Практичный вывод: один уровень → три плана → один триггер входа + стоп за "уровнем ошибки". Если триггера нет - сделки нет. Не работает, когда лезешь в новостной импульс, в тонкую ликвидность или начинаешь двигать стоп "чтобы не выбило". Наш бот @pro

🔥2

18 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я раньше пытался "угадать свечу" и каждый раз платил за это спредом и нервами. Сейчас у меня одно правило: цена пришла к уровню → я выбираю сценарий и жду триггер, а не мнение. Пробой: вхожу только после закрепления и ретеста, стоп - за уровень. Отскок: беру реакцию от уровня, стоп - за экстремум. Флэт: работаю границы малым риском или не лезу до выхода и объёма. Практичный вывод: один уровень → три плана → один исп

👍3

17 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ты не хочешь "прогноз". Ты хочешь план на случай, если рынок сделает не то. Я держу 3 сценария у уровня. Пробой: жду закрепления и ретеста, вхожу только тогда, стоп - за уровень. Отскок: беру реакцию от уровня, но стоп ставлю за экстремум, а не "по ощущениям". Флэт: либо работаю границы маленьким риском и короткими целями, либо не лезу, пока нет выхода и объёма. Практичный вывод: один уровень → три сценария → один

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @crypto_liders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,421 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КриптоЛИДЕР” (@crypto_liders), 13,870 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_liders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.