Channel
@crypto_finance7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,795subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001599676495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_finance7 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_finance7 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 1,795 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:10 | 1,801 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 1,804 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 1,803 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 1,805 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 1,810 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 1,815 | -3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 1,818 | -3 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 1,821 | -7 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 1,828 | -6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 1,834 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 1,836 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 1,836 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| custom 5465465383035083768 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 10.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰$BTC En semanal: la vela semanal terminará cerrando por debajo de la anterior, como una envolvente bajista. En temporalidades menores, se rechazó el 50% del Lunes y no hay volumen de compra.
💰$BTC En zona clave. Si supera este nivel, veremos los 80000 nuevamente. De lo contrario, tendremos caída hasta los 74000.
📊🇺🇸 La inflación de EE.UU. acelera y el mercado apuesta por una suba de tasas El IPC de agosto aumentó 0,4% mensual, en línea con lo esperado, y 3,4% interanual. El dato más preocupante estuvo en el IPC subyacente, que avanzó 0,3% mensual, por encima del 0,2% previsto. En términos interanuales, igualmente desaceleró al 2,4%, desde el 2,5% anterior. El índice general estuvo impulsado principalmente por los combusti…
IPC anual 🇺🇸 3,4% VS EST 3,4% IPC mensual 🇺🇸 0,4% VS EST 0,4%
📊¿Sabías que tenemos un chat grupal donde solo hablamos de análisis, entradas, gráficos, y todo lo relacionado con el mundo de los mercados financieros? ✅Únete ahora! https://t.me/+ho3JJ99paKM1ZjVh
💰$BTC Cerrada en +18% de ganancias🥂 @Master3341
Target 3✅
• BTC/USDT SHORT (10X) • Precio de entrada: 78470 • Target 1: 77900 • Target 2: 77400 • Target 3: 76800 • Target 4: 76380 Stop loss: 79000
🚖$UBER Muy buena pinta.
📊¿Sabías que tenemos un chat grupal donde solo hablamos de análisis, entradas, gráficos, y todo lo relacionado con el mundo de los mercados financieros? ✅Únete ahora! https://t.me/+ho3JJ99paKM1ZjVh
📊Seguro ha notado que estuve un poco inactivo acá y en redes sociales. Tiene que ver con algunas cosas personales y el contexto actual de la bolsa y cripto. Puede que se esté gestando algo muy grande y me dediqué de lleno a averiguar lo que puede estar pasando. 📊Tenemos al SP500 en máximos, a la IA en máximos (todo el tiempo sale algo nuevo y hay mucho hype), tecnológicas y semiconductores en máximos, posible suba d…
📊$META 🚀😉
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_finance7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
La $USDT.D va a...
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoFinance📊” (@crypto_finance7), 1,795 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_finance7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.