Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крипто Суд

@crypto_courts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002343940559
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_courts
DescriptionПредложка - @castomy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/crypto_courts

Growth

1967 Aug 2026, 13:44 — 196 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:46 — 196 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:448 Aug 2026, 11:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 195–197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:46196no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:44196first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9736.1%
👍7026.0%
4918.2%
🤡238.55%
🥰93.35%
😱72.60%
👎51.86%
🤮31.12%
🤯31.12%
🔥10.372%
🤝10.372%
🥴10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2024 to 5 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2025, 08:43 UTC241 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хотер должен сидеть в тюрьме, администрация вскоре займется этим вопросом

😁9

Signed lilemy🩸

12 Apr 2025, 19:05 UTC784 viewsread 8 August 2026

СРОЧНОЕ СОБРАНИЕ - https://t.me/crypto_courts?livestream АДЕЛЬ СКАМЕР

Signed lilemy🩸

28 Feb 2025, 15:13 UTC≈1,500 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

АНОНС СУДА лилеми, секунда и шикос так и не подвели итоги крипто слея, за что должны нести уголовную ответственность. мерой наказания будет: - полная отмена. - раг всех щитков, которые они покупают. - бан в тикток тренчах на неопределенный период.

😁21

Signed lilemy🩸

16 Nov 2024, 13:43 UTC≈1,000 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ФИНАЛЬНЫЙ ВЕРДИКТ ПО ДЕЛУ КАТАЛИСТА За 30 дней он так и не вернул никому ничего, поэтому: Виновного зовут Стас Бобко (фото прикрепленно к посту), по нашим данным проживет он в манчестере, так же был замечен в этом городе. Стикерпак с его фото. Никого ни к чему не призываем, что делать с этой информаций - ваше дело.

🥰94👍2

Signed lilemy🩸

14 Nov 2024, 13:30 UTC≈1,230 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прошел ровно месяц с нашего последнего заседания. Просим отписать мне в лс - @castomy, тем, кому каталист должен был вернуть украденные средства. в случае если мы не увидем соблюдения вердикта со стороны каталиста, мы примим соответствующие меры (полное раскрытие личности виновного).

😱7👍5

Signed lilemy🩸

14 Oct 2024, 19:48 UTC≈2,190 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Запись Крипто Суда и вердикт по делу Каталиста Сегодня был проведен первый суд в рамках проекта «Крипто Суд», на котором мы разобрали дело Каталиста (более подробно можете прочесть здесь ). Общим судейским составом было принято единогласные решение о виновности подсудимого и был вынесен вердикт с следующими условиями: «У виновного будет ровно месяц на возвращение 50% от украденного, после чего он должен будет верн

27👍15😁9🤡2

Signed lilemy🩸

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_courts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крипто Суд” (@crypto_courts), 196 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_courts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.