Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

crypto Scrooge

@cryptoScryagaENG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001149251870
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoScryagaENG
DescriptionThe life and adventures of 0,1 BTC. Russian version https://t.me/cryptoScryaga Contact @Scryagabot
CreatedBetween 1 July 2016 and 31 January 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptoScryagaENG

Growth

156 August 2026 — 15 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:4615no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:0715first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
2
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2020 to 16 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2022, 16:57 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @intervue_eng

Not microwaves of course, but you get the picture

16 Feb 2022, 16:57 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @intervue_eng

This whale won't give a fuck about your phone model, what it's running on. It will just WORK.

🔥1

16 Feb 2022, 16:56 UTC71 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @intervue_eng

It's the third future whale to rival Google Play and App Store. Quote me on this if you like.

16 Feb 2022, 16:56 UTC71 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @intervue_eng

A debot is, simply put, an app you download from the blockchain that interacts with it, using your device to calculate. It's all very safe.

9 Feb 2022, 15:54 UTC61 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/02/apple-unveils-contactless-payments-via-tap-to-pay-on-iphone/

18 Jan 2022, 13:37 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @intervue_eng

The mission of crypto is to create a new ground for changing the world for the better in all kinds of activities, be it politics, social, or economic. The main benefit is irreversibility. Whatever happens happens and can't be tampered with by any third party.

🔥2

24 May 2021, 17:53 UTC95 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Saw this cool new slider over at pancakeswap today, decided to buy some CAKE for the occasion ...and delegate it of course. #CAKE

4 May 2021, 16:00 UTC497 viewsread 11 August 2026

Crypto USP For my money - soulless algorithms over the greedy nature of humanity. #TON

1 Nov 2020, 11:06 UTC462 viewsread 11 August 2026

TON - I don't believe it, - Woland answered, - it just can't be. Manuscripts can't burn. - He turned to Behemoth and said: - Behemoth, hand me the book. M.A. Bulgakov, "Master and Margarita" I've sat down to finish this post a thousand times by now. Started writing, again and again, scrapping it, fixing mistakes, and every time i returned to the thought that i don't have a proper grasp of the theme yet, and the pe

12 Oct 2020, 17:16 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://about.minter.network/ton wonderful slogan #intonwetrust

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoScryagaENG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 577,871 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“crypto Scrooge” (@cryptoScryagaENG), 15 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoScryagaENG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.