Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -337. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,511–4,951 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:39
4,562
-32
13 Sept 2026, 16:00
4,594
-32
10 Sept 2026, 04:15
4,626
-56
4 Sept 2026, 17:56
4,682
-32
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
4,714
-24
28 Aug 2026, 20:08
4,738
-30
25 Aug 2026, 13:07
4,768
-18
22 Aug 2026, 17:06
4,786
-25
19 Aug 2026, 18:08
4,811
-21
16 Aug 2026, 19:28
4,832
-27
13 Aug 2026, 09:58
4,859
-23
10 Aug 2026, 09:27
4,882
-18
7 Aug 2026, 18:45
4,900
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
4,899
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35
40.7%
🔥
28
32.6%
🗿
10
11.6%
🐳
3
3.49%
😱
3
3.49%
⚡
2
2.33%
🎉
2
2.33%
😁
2
2.33%
❤🔥
1
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 24 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto0_hunter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2025 to 24 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
OKX Boost — достойная замена Бинанс Альфе?
Хочу поделится тем, как уже вторую неделю меня кормит ОКХ буст при том, что я целенаправленно не даже не крутил его
За это время я получил:
$LAB — 45$
$ORDER — 28$
$BOT — 34$
$BLUAI — 35$
$CGN — 17$
$MET — 24$
$ZORA — 24$
$SUCCINT — 44$
250$ на ровном месте просто за то, что я пользуюсь OKX кошельком как основным
У вас есть объёмы небольшие, вы редко что-то покупаете/пр…
Как вы управляете своей ликвой? 💸
Сейчас такая фаза рынка — пассивного фарма, если у вас есть свободные стейблы — вы делаете что-то неправильно, каждый день появляются какие-то пулы, стейкинги, бусты с хорошим % куда вы обязаны пристраивать свободную ликву, да и это обезопасит вас от лудки)
1 — Новый пул с $PENGU на ОКХ
В разделе "Эйрдроп Earn" вы можете найти новый пул с токеном $PENGU, который недавно начался ку…
30$/сутки на полном пассиве 💰
Звучит как начало продаж какого-то курса, но это всего лишь лаунчпул на Bybit
После недавнего листинга $FF появился и лаунчпул с этой монетой и прямо сейчас вы можете закинуть туда три монеты на выбор:
⚪️USDT — 30% APR (лимит 2000$)
⚪️MNT — 32% APR (лимит 18.000$)
⚪️FF — 285% APR (лимит ~5000$)
И я думаю вы уже понимаете что речь пойдёт о пуле с самой монетой $FF, так как же нам её …
OKX Альфа — стоит ли крутить? 🥂
Плюсы:
⚪️Порог входа относительно низкий, на минимальный дроп можно претендовать холдив 150$ и крутив по 30$ в течении 15 дней
⚪️Вам не нужны КУСы, много телефонов и нету блокировок, для фермы — идеально, создаёте много кошельков на антиках и крутите альфу
⚪️ОКХ — Тир1 биржа и на их альфе выходят качественные проекты (пока что), это вам не Гейт
⚪️Первая альфа с Линеей покормила оче…
Новый пул на Kucoin с 220% APR — $PTB 👍
Пул у нас фиксированный — внёсенные средства не могут быть выведены до окончания пула
⚪️Покупаем $PTB на споте (лимит 28000 $PTB ~1700$)
⚪️Закидываем в пул
⚪️Шортим в фьючерсах на эту же сумму монет + прибыль (что бы не потерять на курсе)
Через 30 дней получаем 320$ профита на полном пасиве 💰
Chat | Альфа | YouTube | Twitter
Проверка на бдительность 🧠 (дурак, перепутал черновик и паблик)
Чуть подзабил на канал и переключился на второй канал, там публикую всё чем занимаюсь, НО если стоит продолжать делать посты про биржевые активности на ЭТОТ канал — наставьте 👍
Всех обнял 🎩
Заносим стейблы в пул XPL от Binance 🎩
У кого имеется хорошая котлета на руках — есть вариант занести на 60 дней и по истечению этого срока получить 4% на любой сайз (пока не разберут пул)
Забрать деньги с пула можно в любой момент, что является плюсом, но пул могут расширить ещё 2 раза и пока не понятно как это отразится на награде
В любом случае хороший пассивный доход от Binance
Заносим тут 👈
Chat | Альфа | Y…
Вышел чекер дропа от TOWNS 🗿
Уже завтра в 17:00 листинг проекта $TOWNS и сейчас мы можем узнать какое количество токенов (а точнее 50%) мы сможем продать на листинге
Что бы проверить дроп нам нужно:
⚪️Перейти на сайт чекера
⚪️Вставить туда адрес внутренного кошелька к TOWNS (не вашего метамаска, а именно в самом приложении у вас есть Base кошелёк)
Делитесь своими результатами в комментариях 👇
Chat | Альфа | YouT…
TOWNS — скоро листинг? 🗿
Bybit уже дал анонс по листингу $TOWNS, а это значит что уже совсем скоро мы увидим эту монету на биржах
Информации по клейму и дропу я пока не нашел, но надеюсь что нас не обидят
Chat | Альфа | YouTube | Twitter
Monad выйдёт уже в Сентябре? 😇
Проект опубликовал скриншот и добавил "Только одно из этого точно правда"
⚪️Общий саплай — 100 млрд $MON
⚪️Инишиал саплай — 100 млрд $MON
⚪️Дата запуска — 29 Сентября
В Твиттере уже шутят что тут правильный ответ только надпись "Monad" 😁
Лично я уже подзабил на этот и другие ретроактивности, все мы видели как вышли Sahara и Eclipse
Chat | Альфа | YouTube | Twitter
Я не знаю чем вы занимались в крипте если не знаете кто такой Kirill Evans 🥤
Лично для меня это отец СНГ ютуба по крипто тематике, помню ещё лет 5 назад покупал альту по его видео, а сейчас этот дядька возвращается что бы доказать свою компетентность в криптовалюте
Неужели вам не интересен список альтов который могут дать до х50 в текущем цикле? Я сам лично буду наблюдать за этим экспериментом 👇
https://t.me/+s-D9…
Подарки в ТГ = Биткоин? 💰
Сегодня был продан рекордной дорогой подарок — Pepe Plush с чёрным фоном за 100к$ 🤯
Рынок подарков все больше напоминает криптовалютный — старые подарки продолжают расти в цене, а новые подарки (альткоины) стремительно теряют цены и что-то мне подсказывает что альтсезона не будет 😁
Chat | Альфа | YouTube | Admin
🔥4🐳2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto0_hunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@crypto0_hunter named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bohdan0333 named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TON ON EVERYDAY @tononeveryday · 96,594 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
CRYPTOLUCID @crypto_lucid · 33,610 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
Crypto Airdrops @Hamsterkeygen3 · 41,147 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Mafia @vse_v_cripte · 24,748 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 September 2026
Faik’s calls @yaIudoman · 54,590 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
CryptoM4 🏎 @CryptoM4 · 69,490 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
CryptoHub @darling_not · 54,717 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто Хантер 💸” (@crypto0_hunter), 4,562 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto0_hunter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.