https://app.hot-labs.org/link?4192257uu

Channel
ππππππNπππ
@cryptellk
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
823subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002107197248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptellk |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptellk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 823 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 836 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 845 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 845 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 846 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://t.me/lomtopzvbot?start=_tgr_Xg2hhHZkMGRk Free stars!!!!
Solana: Between Speed ββand Reliability Current Situation Analysis So, Solana (SOL) is our patient today π. The report suggests viewing it as a "speculative idea," which is generally fair. But let's dig deeper. The metrics show that Solana does indeed deliver impressive transaction speeds and low fees. But, as always, there are nuances. π Good: The obvious positive is speed and low cost. Solana is positioned as aβ¦
Bitcoin Crash: What Happened? π π¨βπ» Analyst's View So, according to the report as of December 12, 2025, Bitcoin is trading at $92,400. Despite the seemingly high price, analysts note that this is more the result of speculation than actual demand. The market as a whole is showing volatility, and macroeconomic factors (inflation, interest rates, geopolitics) are creating additional pressure. It is especially noted thβ¦
15m TF. After a long period of accumulation, new volumes from buyers began to arrive on the instrument. This gave buyers the opportunity to seize the initiative and form a local upside structure. During the correction, liquidity accumulated for a long time in the form of buyer stops. A resistance level formed, towards which the price is currently rising with increased volumes and increased activity in the order bookβ¦
Video, posted without a caption
π Arkham: Satoshi Nakamoto's net worth plummeted by $47 billion According to Arkham, Satoshi's net worth has fallen from a peak of $137 billion to $90.7 billion. Satoshi didn't sell his coins or conduct any transactions, so his net worth fluctuates solely with the BTC price. This is a normal market movement, not the result of any actions by Bitcoin's mysterious creator. π₯ Course "How to Make $500 for Beginners"
π¨ CRYPTO BLOODBATH FRIDAY π¨ $BTC just flash-crashed to $80.5K (FTX-era lows) and now bouncing weakly around $83-85K β down 6-8% today, -25% from November highs π± $ETH smashed to $2,700s, most alts down 10-20% Total market cap sub-$3T again after $2B+ liquidations in 24h Liquidity crunch + macro panic + rate-cut doubts = worst monthly bleed since 2022 Everyone who was calling β$150K EOYβ two weeks agoβ is mysterioβ¦
β Short-term BTC holders have crushed the market β’ Realized losses have risen to levels seen during the FTX crash. β’ Short-term holders have taken the brunt of the blow: they are closing their positions en masse at a loss. β’ Losses in recent days exceed $1 billion based on the 7-day moving average, indicating the capitulation of those who bought closer to the highs. β’ Long-term holders remain calm, but pressure fromβ¦
@Cryptellk BLACK FRIDAY CRASH IN CRYPTO π¨ $BTC just dumped below $84K (now bouncing around ~$83-85K) β down 8-10% in 24h, worst monthly bleed since the 2022 apocalypse π± From October ATH >$126K β now -35% in weeks. Liquidations $2B+, ETF outflows record $4B in November. $ETH smashed to ~$2,700 (-9%) $SOL bleeding to ~$125-130 (-12%) $XRP holding ~$1.9-2.0 but still red Total market cap dipped under $3T again β feaβ¦
π The heist of the century: a gang kidnapped a "crypto billionaire" with $9 in his account The guy was bragging about his trading success on social media, and a girl from a London gang noticed. She lured him to a "luxury" apartment, where three men with knives and machetes were already waiting. πͺ They demanded access to his crypto wallet, but after learning it was an ordinary hairdresser with $9, they reduced theirβ¦
21Shares Launches New U.S. Crypto Index ETFs β’ 21Shares (Swiss crypto asset manager) launched two U.S.-listed ETFs tracking a basket of cryptocurrencies (Ethereum, Solana, Dogecoin, etc.). β’ These ETFs are structured under the 1940 Act β a regulatory framework more common for traditional funds. 2. U.S. Strategic Crypto Reserve β’ The U.S. government (Trump administration) is building a βStrategic Bitcoin Reserveβ β¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptellk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptellk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππππNπππβ (@cryptellk), 823 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptellk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.