Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Arena

Channel

Crypto Arena

@crypt_arena

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

39,298subscribers

-3,671 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002394486840
TypeChannel
Username@crypt_arena
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypt_arena

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

39,29842,96941,133.57 August 2026 — 42,969 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,969 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,902 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,808 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,760 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,719 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,675 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,582 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,512 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,433 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,387 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,322 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,284 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,243 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,162 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,027 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,976 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,941 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,901 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,849 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,812 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,777 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,724 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,687 subscribers4 September 2026 — 41,617 subscribers6 September 2026 — 41,514 subscribers10 September 2026 — 41,361 subscribers12 September 2026 — 41,255 subscribers13 September 2026 — 41,193 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41,123 subscribers17 September 2026 — 41,056 subscribers27 September 2026 — 40,635 subscribers4 October 2026 — 40,334 subscribers9 October 2026 — 40,143 subscribers13 October 2026 — 39,986 subscribers14 October 2026 — 39,928 subscribers15 October 2026 — 39,884 subscribers16 October 2026 — 39,849 subscribers17 October 2026 — 39,821 subscribers18 October 2026 — 39,780 subscribers19 October 2026 — 39,743 subscribers20 October 2026 — 39,693 subscribers22 October 2026 — 39,652 subscribers23 October 2026 — 39,606 subscribers24 October 2026 — 39,570 subscribers25 October 2026 — 39,538 subscribers26 October 2026 — 39,516 subscribers27 October 2026 — 39,491 subscribers28 October 2026 — 39,433 subscribers29 October 2026 — 39,384 subscribers30 October 2026 — 39,334 subscribers31 October 2026 — 39,298 subscribers7 August 202631 October 2026
54 measurements spanning 85 days, net -3,671. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,747–43,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 04:3839,298-36
30 Oct 2026, 06:4139,334-50
29 Oct 2026, 09:5139,384-49
28 Oct 2026, 08:3839,433-58
27 Oct 2026, 06:5639,491-25
26 Oct 2026, 04:1739,516-22
25 Oct 2026, 05:4939,538-32
24 Oct 2026, 06:1139,570-36
23 Oct 2026, 04:3639,606-46
22 Oct 2026, 02:2139,652-41
20 Oct 2026, 22:1039,693-50
19 Oct 2026, 23:0539,743-37
18 Oct 2026, 22:4639,780-41
17 Oct 2026, 20:4639,821-28
16 Oct 2026, 20:4539,849-35
15 Oct 2026, 19:5539,884-44
14 Oct 2026, 20:4639,928-58
13 Oct 2026, 12:0739,986-157
9 Oct 2026, 10:4140,143-191
4 Oct 2026, 21:5740,334first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.10%
avg views ÷ 39,298 subscribers
Avg views / post
827
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.847%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held34 (4 February 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total3,306
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Oct 2026, 21:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

760 reactions across 34 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39351.7%
👍13317.5%
🔥709.21%
💯567.37%
🤝212.76%
😁172.24%
👏141.84%
✍101.32%
🆒91.18%
🎉81.05%
🤯70.921%
🐳50.658%
👨‍💻50.658%
💘40.526%
🤷‍♀30.395%
👀10.132%
🕊10.132%
😱10.132%
🙈10.132%
🤓10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC335 views7 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

A photo of a WSJ page featuring an ad against stock tokenization has gone viral on social media A photo of a full-page advertisement in The Wall Street Journal newspaper has gone viral on X. It is addressed to the heads of public companies and begins with the words: “Your stocks. Their tokens. Your problem.” The text warns that crypto platforms will soon begin tokenizing stocks on unregulated platforms and calls fo…

❤3👍2🔥2

15 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC811 views7 reactionsread 30 October 2026

Ledger issues official statement on mass wallet thefts Hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger has issued an official statement regarding the mass thefts and announced new rules for device sales. Devices sold through Malaysian reseller CryptoBilis were found to contain soldered-in modules designed to steal seed phrases. External estimates put the losses from the mass theft involving Ledger devices over the weekend at …

👍2💯2🔥2❤1

10 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,060 views8 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

BTC and ETH Options Expire Today! $1.8B in #BTC options and $341M in #ETH options. ▫️ Key area of interest for BTC: $84,000. ▫️ Key area of interest for ETH: $2,600.

❤4💯2🔥2

9 Oct 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

The Market Is Currently Skewed Toward Short Sellers ➤ If #BTC surges to around $91,300, short liquidations could exceed $8.57 billion. ➤ If #ETH surges to around $2,810, short liquidations could exceed $6.83 billion.

❤2🔥2🤝2

18 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,800 views9 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

According to the cryptocurrency options exchange Deribit, Bitcoin options worth a total of $1.72 billion expire today at 8:00 UTC. The put/call ratio is 0.77, and the "max pain" price—the level at which the largest number of options buyers lose their premiums—is $77,000. At the same time, Ethereum options worth $360 million are expiring. The put/call ratio is 0.49, and the "max pain" price is $2,500.

❤3💯2🤝2😁2

10 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,070 views9 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is at a key turning point The MVRV Z-Score indicator is testing its 365-day moving average. In 2015, 2019, and 2023, the recovery of this level marked the transition from a bear market to a new bull market. A close above this level could become an important signal.

❤4👍3🤝2

8 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,950 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Why F2Pool co-founder questioned the justification for Zcash's growth Crypto millionaire Chun Wang, co-founder of one of the largest mining pools F2Pool (15% of Bitcoin's hashrate), stated that ZEC's fundamental metrics do not justify its position among the largest cryptocurrencies. Wang noted that there have long been questions about Zcash regarding token distribution, project governance, and network security. Ac…

👍2💯2😁2

20 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,190 views17 reactionsread 30 October 2026

💲 Digital yuan to appear in 8 new Chinese banks This year, the People's Bank of China tripled the number of banks participating in digital yuan (e-CNY) operations, increasing the total from ten at the beginning of the year to 30. Eight new banks were added this week, including Ping An Bank, Hengfeng Bank, Bank of Shanghai, and Bank of Hangzhou. They have connected to the e-CNY system and will begin providing servic…

❤12👍2✍1🤝1😁1

19 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,790 views4 reactionsread 30 October 2026

Citi to launch Bitcoin custody service by end of 2026 American bank Citi has confirmed that its digital asset custody service will launch this year, with Bitcoin set to be the platform's first cryptocurrency. According to The Block, the service will become part of a new offering called Custody+, which will combine traditional and cryptocurrency custody into a single system. In November 2025, the bank had already an…

❤2👍1🙈1

18 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,630 views8 reactionsread 30 October 2026

🇺🇸 The US Treasury has presented rules for the issuance and sale of stablecoins Starting in 2027, issuers and crypto trading platforms will face new restrictions in the stablecoin sector on the American market. According to the proposal, starting January 18 of next year, stablecoin issuers will be required to obtain a federal or regional license. Platforms will also be able to sell stablecoins issued abroad, but on…

❤3✍1👍1🔥1🕊1😱1

18 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

The amount of BTC supply currently “in profit” has fallen into a multi-year extreme low zone. Some experts refer to this as a “capitulation zone,” suggesting that the bottom may be near, though there is no guarantee that it has already formed at current levels. According to the Coinbase Premium Index, institutional investors on Coinbase have continued selling aggressively for 90 consecutive days. Meanwhile, the time…

❤1💯1🤝1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,400 views7 reactionsread 30 October 2026

Israel’s largest regulated crypto broker, Bits of Gold, has suffered a potential data breach affecting 200,000 customers.

❤3💯2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @crypt_arena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Arena” (@crypt_arena), 39,298 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypt_arena.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.