Crypto just saw the largest liquidation event in history — CoinGlass data.
❤2👍2💯2

Channel
@crypt0_horizon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
57,023subscribers
-2,414 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002288268983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypt0_horizon |
| Description | 🔎 Explore the crypto space with the Crypto Horizon channel. 📰 The latest crypto market news is here. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypt0_horizon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 57,023 | -124 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 57,147 | -88 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 57,235 | -107 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 57,342 | -55 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 57,397 | -136 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 57,533 | -100 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 57,633 | -166 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 57,799 | -119 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 57,918 | -112 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 58,030 | -92 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 58,122 | -89 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 58,211 | -91 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 58,302 | -181 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 58,483 | -136 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 58,619 | -149 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 58,768 | -69 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 58,837 | -138 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 58,975 | -117 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 59,092 | -67 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 59,159 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (23 January 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,904 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
898 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 447 | 49.8% | |
| 👍 | 173 | 19.3% | |
| 💯 | 72 | 8.02% | |
| 🤝 | 71 | 7.91% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 7.68% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 2.23% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 1.45% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.668% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.557% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.445% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 0.445% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.445% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.445% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.334% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.223% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.111% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 898reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Crypto just saw the largest liquidation event in history — CoinGlass data.
❤2👍2💯2
Michael Saylor said that Strategy plans to buy significantly more BTC in the near future.
🔥3❤2💯2
Off-balance-sheet investment commitments of U.S. AI-focused big tech companies, as reported by the WSJ. Google is the clear leader.
✍1💯1😁1
#BTC > $64 000
👍2🔥2🤝2
Trump and Melania’s memecoins, #TRUMP and #MELANIA, have plunged 98% and 99%, respectively, almost immediately after their launches. There is little hope of a recovery. Everyone who invested in these tokens lost money. The Trump family’s crypto earnings amounted to $1.4 billion in 2025. Critics in the U.S. call it perhaps the most blatant example of corruption in the history of American politics.
✍3💯2😱2
Whale activity in LINK has surged. Santiment reports that large holders continue to accumulate.
🤝3❤1👍1💯1🔥1
Fans of the Bollinger Bands indicator believe BTC is on the verge of an “explosive” move, similar to the one seen in October 2023. Many experts note that if Bitcoin’s four-year cycles are still intact, the start of a new three-year bull market could fall as early as October–December this year.
👍3🤝2❤1💯1
Short-term holders have started aggressively selling BTC at a loss again. BTC reserves on Binance have begun rising sharply — historically bearish, as BTC may be moved to the exchange for subsequent selling.
👍4🔥2❤1💯1😁1
U.S. publicly traded companies now hold 1.24 million BTC—nearly 93% of all corporate Bitcoin holdings worldwide. Over the past year, they acquired an additional 510,000 BTC—more than three times the amount mined during the same period.
👍3💯2🤝2😁1
Flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs remain stagnant, while BTC continues to trade within the $58,000–$70,000 range. The broader consensus remains unchanged: there are early signs that a market bottom may be forming, but a mass capitulation has yet to occur. As a result, the possibility of one final leg down toward the $40,000–$50,000 range still remains.
❤3🤝3👍2💯1
Binance bStocks has attracted over $600 million in just seven weeks, surpassing xStocks to become the largest platform for tokenized stocks. At the same time, Binance now accounts for $22.9 billion in open interest in perpetual futures—roughly one-third of the global total.
🔥3✍2💯2
Over the past 24 hours, only 58 wallets have withdrawn funds from BitMart, totaling just $805,000. The exchange has not processed a single withdrawal in the last 8 hours. Have they decided to keep the money for themselves?
✍1❤1👍1🔥1🤝1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @crypt0_horizon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Horizon” (@crypt0_horizon), 57,023 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypt0_horizon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.