Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Cryprich bitcoin robot trading کریپریچ کریپتو
@cryprich
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455830621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryprich |
| Description | Investment consultancy مشاورهسرمایه گذاری StocksWallstreet فاینانس پروژه finance SBLC LC BG ارز های دیجیتال آلتکوین بیتکوین و اتریوم @aramisgroup2 💎 WhatsApp +989351076964 +989038099177 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryprich |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 16 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,120
- Videos
- ≈123
- Links
- ≈280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 22s
- Average length
- 2m 04s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#gold #trade
اینستاگرام از مخربترین چیزهاییه که آدم میتونه ازش استفاده کنه. صبح تا شب روایتهای غیرواقعیِ مردم از زندگیهاشون رو میبینی، و بهطرزِ فاجعهآمیزی ازشون الگو میگیری و بهقدری در توهم غرق میشی که اصلاً یادت میره خودت کی هستی، چی هستی، کجا هستی، باید چیکار کنی. این اپلیکیشن به شما حس عقب مونده بودن میده از همه چیز حس بد اندام بودن حس اینکه همه دارن خوش میگذرونن به جز شما ,احساس بی پول بودن,احساس موفق نبودن,حس همه …
📝جنبش دفاع ملی یا بسیج حکومتی (درباره چیستی اجتماعات مداوم شبانه در جنگ چهلروزه) ✍🏻حمیدرضا جلائیپور مقدمه ✅از نهم اسفند ۱۴۰۴ که جنگ دوم آمریکا و اسرائیل علیه ایران شروع شد و حدودا تا بیست و هشت خرداد ١۴٠۵ که یادداشت تفاهم بین روسای جمهور ایران و آمریکا امضا شد (١)، حدود صد و ده روز و شب طول کشید. بخش قابل توجهی از مردم ایران در این مدت و در شبها و در مخالفت با این جنگ به خیابانها آمدند. خصوصا این اجتماعات در …
@ali.safaeihaeri مرگ بر این روح سَرِمان را پایین میاندازیم و ذکر میگوییم و خیال میکنیم این اخلاق اسلامی است! بقیه را نفی میکنیم و خیال میکنیم کارِ خوب را ما کردهایم! مایی که پسران و دخترانمان از دست رفتهاند تا چه رسد به همسایهها و همشهریهایمان... به بهانهی این که حالم بهخاطر معاشرت با دیگران گرفته میشود و بحران روحی پیدا میکنم سر در لاک خودمان بردهایم. مرگ بر این روح... 🎙 استادصفایی درباره این موضوع، …
Video, posted without a caption
اثر منفیگرایی در رابطهها بیآزار بودن، از کامل بودن مهمتر است. چکیده محورهای محتوایی ویدئو: - در روابط، رفتارهای منفی تأثیری ماندگارتر از رفتارهای مثبت دارند. - ذهن انسان کار منفی را بزرگنمایی و کار مثبت را کمرنگ میکند. - بهجای «ایدهآل بودن» در رابطه، «بیآزار بودن» پایدارتر است. - اثر منفیگرایی توضیح میدهد چرا یک رفتار تلخ میتواند سالها در ذهن بماند. گاهی میگوییم «من برایش کم نگذاشتم» اما او فقط همان…
Supportive men are the best 👏🏼#men #relationshipgoals #strongmen #strongwomen Join the Download videos from «Instagram, Twitter and YouTube» bot ID: @Multi_Media_Downloader_bot ID: @Multi_Media_Downloader_bot
حد ما رو زد برگشت بالا 3940 گرفته بودیم
4ساعت همزمان زیر ترند و روند و سقف های قبلی #طلا زیر 40020
بعد از حد زدن الکی خرید دیشب. صبح نقطه دقیق فروش زدیم. تی پی 62 بود. ببین از 58 برگشتنش @cryprich
When someone says “That’s expensive,” they’re not always talking about the price. They’re talking about perceived value — and that’s on you to shape. If your offer feels like a cost instead of an investment, the problem isn’t the number on the price tag. It’s the story you’ve told (or haven’t told) about what it does, who it’s for, and the transformation it delivers. 💡 People happily pay $5 for coffee, $1,500 for a…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cryprich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 450,554 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryprich bitcoin robot trading کریپریچ کریپتو” (@cryprich), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryprich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.