Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Круизы

Channel

Круизы

@cruises

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,024subscribers

-919 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001514497820
TypeChannel
Username@cruises
Created28 September 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cruises

Growth

20,02420,94320,483.57 August 2026 — 20,943 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,915 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,848 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,595 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,568 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,555 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,415 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,221 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,170 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,156 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,146 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,139 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,137 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,129 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,110 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,101 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,075 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,024 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net -919. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,886–21,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 00:3820,024-51
26 Aug 2026, 22:0320,075-26
25 Aug 2026, 20:2820,101-9
24 Aug 2026, 19:0420,110-19
23 Aug 2026, 02:4820,129-8
21 Aug 2026, 12:2320,137-2
20 Aug 2026, 09:1320,139-7
19 Aug 2026, 11:4520,146-10
18 Aug 2026, 08:4320,156-14
17 Aug 2026, 11:4820,170-51
16 Aug 2026, 02:2820,221-194
14 Aug 2026, 14:5520,415-140
13 Aug 2026, 04:2520,555-13
12 Aug 2026, 04:5320,568-19
11 Aug 2026, 06:0820,587-8
10 Aug 2026, 09:3520,595-253
9 Aug 2026, 07:1520,848-10
8 Aug 2026, 09:4220,858-57
7 Aug 2026, 08:5820,915-28
7 Aug 2026, 01:4520,943first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 September 2021the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3823.2%
👍3219.5%
🤩1710.4%
🔥148.54%
🐳127.32%
👏106.10%
😍74.27%
🙊74.27%
🙈53.05%
🤓53.05%
🤨53.05%
🙉31.83%
🥰31.83%
❤‍🔥21.22%
👎21.22%
💘21.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2021 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cruises. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 September 2021 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

https://max.ru/maldivy Поддержите нас подпиской 🫶

1👍1👏1🔥1

16 Apr 2026, 18:22 UTC521 views14 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

В гавани Белфаста в Северной Ирландии 950 светящихся дронов воссоздали силуэт легендарного RMS Titanic в натуральную величину! Получилось так, будто лайнер снова выходит из гавани, где его когда-то построили. Шоу приурочили к 114-й годовщине отплытия «Титаника» 2 апреля 1912 года. Многие уже называют это зрелище призрачно красивым. @cruises

🤩5🤓43👎2

30 Mar 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,090 views25 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Как вам такой плавучий небоскреб?) @cruises

🐳10😍7🤨53

30 Mar 2026, 14:49 UTC821 views17 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Ikon of the Seas Miami ✅ @cruises

🔥83🥰3🐳1👏1🤩1

6 Feb 2024, 06:06 UTC≈1,880 views51 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Video

Может пора в отпуск?😁

👍2014🤩10🔥5❤‍🔥1💘1

21 Dec 2023, 08:58 UTC≈1,650 views29 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Я в круиз! Кто со мной? Всем мечтателям и любителям путешествий посвящается! Вы хотите в круиз? Начнем с грустного: отпуск такой короткий 🫣 Но есть и хорошая новость: можно сделать так, чтобы он стал гораздо длиннее, насыщеннее и ярче! 🎇 Зачем проводить отпуск в одной стране? Мы откроем для вас огромный мир 🌎, полный удивительных приключений, фантастических впечатлений и интересных знакомств! Поехали с нами в круиз!🚢

👍118👏8❤‍🔥1🤩1

3 Nov 2023, 22:53 UTC927 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Лучшие круизы 🚢 можно забронировать у нас в офисе

5💘1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @cruises. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,445,170 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Круизы” (@cruises), 20,024 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cruises.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.