Photo, posted without a caption
☃1
Channel
@crptbomjj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
258subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001780761471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crptbomjj |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crptbomjj |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 258 | +2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 256 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 262 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 263 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 262 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 264 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 265 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 264 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 264 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
72 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 14 | 19.4% | |
| 🗿 | 11 | 15.3% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5472030678633684592 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| ☃ | 5 | 6.94% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5372917041193828849 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2024 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
☃1
парсер сайтов CEX coin market cap✅️ Gecko ✅️ cryptorank.io/ ✅️
Маркетинг агентство✅ Каналы по крипте✅ Каналы в других тематиках🧐 Байбит промки🧐
Крипта скам + гавно👎
ИТОГИ Все ебло в метках снял 3-4 меточных аккаунта и все на этом, из 25 аккаунтов - 7 прошли удачно и получил 100% проходку и 1.2k$ чистыми Эх если бы не проебался получил бы 5k$ чистейшей прибыли с данной расколбасной активности Кстати щяс залетаю в промку FLOCK 13 акков на данный момент 150$ - хз поздно щяс делать или нет потому 7 дней осталось НО если фастом у вас есть КУСер то можно влететь Думаю я дойду до …
custom 54720306786336845924custom 53729170411938288492
БАЙБИТ ПРОМКИ Первое что хочу сказать что залетаем на сумму которую не жалко потерять - все потому что правила изменились и непонятно остались места в промке или нет, также очень много меток приходят и придется потеть чтобы снять эту хуйню https://www.bybit.com/en/trade/spot/token-splash/detail?code=20241217064515 - 6k мест, 350$, 02.01 https://www.bybit.com/en/trade/spot/token-splash/detail?code=20241218104409 - …
☃3👻3custom 54720306786336845922🎅1🗿1custom 53729170411938288491
Лутаем дроп от ABSTRACT Abstract - это L2 блокчейн от команды Pudgy Penguins -> Запуск токена намечен на январь 2025 Майннет будет в январе Также фармим роли в дискорде -> есть две роли за которые мы получим токены во время запуска майннета: - Elite Chad - Giga Chad Самая топовая роль Giga Chad но ее сложно получить, но и за Elite Chad дадут токены, думаю смартыч влететь в их дс их фармить роли Также отправляем…
🐳2🤮2🫡2☃1🗿1🤔1
БРАЙАН СЖАЛИЛСЯ И РАЗДАЛ ПОВТОРНЫЙ ДРОП Брайан сделал умный мув -> первое при основном дропе челы которые делали ~1 транзу после снепшота получали неплохое количество токенов Также и сейчас кто делал ~1 транзу получают повторный дроп, если он лутал основной airdrop Checker -> https://www.layerzero.foundation/eligibility Команда л0 сделали анонс о том что раздадут незаклеймленые токены тем кто получал дроп, так чт…
🗿3🤔3⚡2🐳1🤮1
LayerZero 4/10 900$ ставь 🤮 если у тебя также ставь ⚡️ если результат лучше
🤮10⚡2
Я закончил. Я не могу это больше терпеть. Эти аирдропы, когда ты дрочешь их 3 года, а тебе буквально сыпят среднюю зп топ-менеджера за месяц. У меня семья, дети, мне надо их кормить. Я продаю все свои токены и удаляю свои аккаунты. Я ухожу с рынка полностью. Я не могу больше мириться с манипуляцией и мошенничеством команд, мои нервы буквально на исходе. Я больше никогда не вернусь на эти рынки.
😢7🗿1
Каждый день тыкаем BLUM, точнее каждые 8 часов тыкаем BLUM, лучше играем в игру в BLUM, также шарим рефку BLUM повторяем каждый день чтобы не болела спина
криптобомж pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crptbomjj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@crptbomjj named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“криптобомж” (@crptbomjj), 258 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crptbomjj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.