Al margen de los rumores e insinuaciones, Mohamed VI está bastante mal
👏56🤔22😁18👍17🎉12🔥7🥰2😱2

Channel
@cronicasmilitares
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
6,054subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001671082423 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cronicasmilitares |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cronicasmilitares |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 6,054 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 6,067 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 6,076 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 6,084 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 6,086 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 6,091 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 6,101 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 6,102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 6,102 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,582 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 390 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 247 | 15.6% | |
| 🤣 | 227 | 14.3% | |
| 🤔 | 143 | 9.04% | |
| 🙏 | 134 | 8.47% | |
| 😁 | 98 | 6.19% | |
| 😱 | 88 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 71 | 4.49% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 3.67% | |
| 🤯 | 57 | 3.60% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 1.14% | |
| 🥴 | 18 | 1.14% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 0.759% | |
| 🤨 | 11 | 0.695% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 0.442% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.126% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.063% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,582reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 5 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Al margen de los rumores e insinuaciones, Mohamed VI está bastante mal
👏56🤔22😁18👍17🎉12🔥7🥰2😱2
Los talibanes informa de la toma de una población pakistaní a 26km de la frontera
🔥33🤬19👍14🤔14🤯2😁2
Otro ángulo del combate cuerpo a cuerpo
🙏47🤯14👍10😱7🤬2👏1
Un submarino ruso de clase Novorossiysk fue monitorizado ayer por la FA portuguesa durante una misión de patrullaje destinada a proteger el espacio marítimo bajo jurisdicción nacional.
👍63🤬28🔥7😁6🤔3👏1🤨1
"Un magrebí agrede a un vigilante en un supermercado de Fuerteventura". Si, es el pan nuestro de cada día. Lo lamentable es que sólo una pareja de turistas ayuda al vigilante. Ni los ciudadanos ni los propios trabajadores del establecimiento hacen nada
🤬123👍9🤔4😁4🤣3😍2🔥1🤨1
Serigne Mbayé, el mantero de Podemos amenaza a los agentes que persiguieron al ilegal que se tiró al río y se ahogó y a los ciudadanos que no quieren que las calles se llenen de ilegales: «Esta lucha ya no va a parar».
🤬121😁9🤔7🤣4🔥3🥴3👍2🥰1
Según rrddss chinas, el bombardero furtivo H-20 habría realizado su vuelo inaugural, acompañado por un J-16. Perfectamente podría ser fake. Hay que esperar a ver qué dicen los medios especializados. De: @Defence_IDA
🤔32👍11🔥3😁3🤣2🤨1
A la tripulación rusa de este T-80BVM le falta instrucción
🤣79🤔16👍5😁4👏3👌1
La parte final de la conversación entre los dos soldados traducida
🙏64😱25🤬16👍7🥰6🤯3👏2
El soldado yakutio explicó el combate
🤬37👍21🥰8😱8👏3🙏3
Lleva un par de días circulando uno de los peores vídeos de la guerra en el que un soldado ucraniano y otro ruso se enfrentan en un "face to face" hasta la muerte de uno de ellos. Es polémica su difusión pero creo que Telegram es el lugar. ⚠️ Es muy crudo, estáis avisados
🤯37🙏20😱17👍7🤬3👏2🤨1
Un gato antiaéreo interceptó un FPV civil 😜
😁43🤣34👍6👌3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cronicasmilitares. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crónicas Militares” (@cronicasmilitares), 6,054 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cronicasmilitares.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.