Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,183–7,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 17:20
7,204
+3
6 Nov 2026, 11:38
7,201
-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:31
7,203
-4
31 Oct 2026, 11:36
7,207
-12
28 Oct 2026, 14:31
7,219
+5
25 Oct 2026, 09:26
7,214
-9
22 Oct 2026, 04:07
7,223
-6
19 Oct 2026, 01:18
7,229
+2
15 Oct 2026, 17:46
7,227
+15
12 Oct 2026, 16:51
7,212
+12
6 Oct 2026, 09:56
7,200
+1
29 Sept 2026, 01:56
7,199
+2
19 Sept 2026, 00:21
7,197
+3
14 Sept 2026, 12:00
7,194
-2
10 Sept 2026, 20:16
7,196
-11
6 Sept 2026, 03:37
7,207
-4
1 Sept 2026, 18:46
7,211
-9
29 Aug 2026, 14:15
7,220
-11
26 Aug 2026, 08:55
7,231
-5
23 Aug 2026, 06:54
7,236
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 7,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
36 (25 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
20,208
Reactions total
327
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 01:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,180
Videos
≈260
Links
≈945
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 04s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,509 reactions across 36 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
571
37.8%
custom 5399852718137297725
345
22.9%
🕊
154
10.2%
❤🔥
149
9.87%
🤩
88
5.83%
🏆
47
3.11%
⚡
45
2.98%
👍
36
2.39%
😍
21
1.39%
🐳
20
1.33%
👏
14
0.928%
🙏
7
0.464%
🎉
4
0.265%
🤔
3
0.199%
🌚
2
0.133%
🤯
2
0.133%
😁
1
0.066%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Внедрить — внедрили, освоить — забыли❓
По данным Gartner, число плановых корпоративных изменений на сотрудника выросло с двух в 2016 году до десяти в 2022-м. С генеративным ИИ проверять идеи и создавать инструменты стало еще быстрее. А вот сотрудникам все еще нужно время, чтобы разобраться в новом процессе — параллельно с текущими задачами и адаптацией к предыдущим нововведениям.
Главный вызов — организовать освое…
Больше года на двух системах: как мы переходили с Clarity на Directum Projects🔥
Почти 20 лет проекты в КРОК вели в Clarity. Со временем компания ее переросла, и на замену выбрали Directum Projects.
Главный вызов — заменить звено в работающем процессе: система управления проектами связана с таск-системой, учетом времени и корпоративной отчетностью.Поэтому больше года две системы работали параллельно.
Directum Proje…
❤️Не подработка, а первая ступень карьеры: как мы развиваем стажеров
Юлия Сашникова, руководитель бренда работодателя КРОК, рассказала в эфире Радио РБК, как мы помогаем молодым специалистам начать карьеру.
Молодые специалисты — одна из основ устойчивости бизнеса КРОК, поэтому мы нанимаем ребят самых разных профилей: как технических, так и бизнес-профессий. Стажировка у нас — первая ступень карьеры, а не временное …
Нашли еще один повод договориться ❤️
Отмечаем в офисе HalloWin/Win: особый день, когда мы бросаем вызов токсичным коммуникациям и учимся еще качественнее договариваться с коллегами. В программе: бассейн с шариками для поднятия настроения, онлайн-игра с тренировкой качественных коммуникаций, а ещё громкий вопрос — чтобы точно понимать коллег даже без слов.
Делимся атмосферой в нашем ролике ⬆️
🔥ИИ в горной промышленности: от отдельных алгоритмов к связанному производству
Как меняется подход к цифровизации производства? Своим экспертным взглядом поделилась Елена Сапунова, директор по отраслевым решениям горнодобывающей промышленности КРОК в подкасте «Добывающая промышленность» на выставке «Рудник Урала» в Екатеринбурге.
Елена выделила 3 основных направления цифрового развития на ближайшие годы:
🟢От отдель…
ИИ-агенты могут изменить рынок корпоративного ПО ⚡️
Александр Сысоев, руководитель направления «Инфраструктурные решения» КРОК, прокомментировал для TAdviser перспективы влияния искусственного интеллекта на российский рынок корпоративного ПО:
Производители традиционного ПО начнут активно встраивать ИИ в свои продукты. Это расширит возможности автоматизации и создаст новые сценарии использования. В результате ИИ мож…
Осень в КРОК ❤️
Делимся осенним настроением в офисе. Для нас осень — не только время уюта и тепла, но ещё и продуктивной работы, поэтому мы особенно заботимся об атмосфере на рабочих местах ✔️
⚡️Из чего складывается устойчивость?
На фоне роста цен и дефицита оборудования становится сложнее понять, что обойдется дороже: резервные мощности или простой сервиса. Нужен баланс: какие ресурсы можно перераспределить, где необходимы закупки и какой уровень защиты оправдан для каждого сервиса.
Александр Сысоев, руководитель направления «Инфраструктурные решения» КРОК, в статье для CNews рассказывает, как управлять…
ИИ пишет код за секунды. А согласование всё ещё занимает три дня 💬
Можно выдать разработчикам ИИ-ассистентов и ждать кратного роста продуктивности. Но если команда ищет документацию, ждет ревью и переключается между задачами, ускорять написание кода — только часть решения.
Как понять, что на самом деле тормозит разработку, а не просто пересчитать коммиты? В статье разбираем, как связать DORA, SPACE и DevEx, чтобы у…
Мы в КРОК не боимся новых высот — ни в прямом, ни в переносном смысле ❤️
Недавно провели открытый день по скалолазанию для всех желающих — независимо от уровня подготовки. Сначала размялись на небольшой высоте, а потом попробовали забраться почти под самый потолок уже со страховкой. Маршрут по силам нашелся для каждого: и тем, кто пришел впервые, и тем, кто уже уверенно чувствует себя на стене.
Покорили новые высот…
🔥16custom 539985271813729772511🏆4❤🔥1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @croc_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Контур @skbkontur_official · 25,130 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Карьера в ВТБ @vtb_career · 80,377 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Yandex Cloud @yandexcloudnews · 23,943 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРОК” (@croc_it), 7,204 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/croc_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.