Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,020–1,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:39
1,372
-16
11 Sept 2026, 12:01
1,388
-34
6 Sept 2026, 15:00
1,422
-34
2 Sept 2026, 13:03
1,456
-25
30 Aug 2026, 08:16
1,481
+393
27 Aug 2026, 03:36
1,088
-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:27
1,090
+3
20 Aug 2026, 13:03
1,087
+5
14 Aug 2026, 07:56
1,082
+1
10 Aug 2026, 14:04
1,081
+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:01
1,080
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,080
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
42
53.8%
❤
24
30.8%
💔
12
15.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آدمهای ساده را باید مثل یک تابلوی نقاشی
ساعتها تماشا کرد
عمرشان کوتاه است
بس که هرکسی از راه میرسد
یا ازشان سوء استفاده میکند
یا زمینشان میزند
یا درس سادهنبودن یادشان میدهد!
آدمهای ساده را دوست دارم
بوی ناب انسان میدهند...
🖊 احمد شاملو
@critical_dialogue
هروقت خیلی زیادی حس قربانی بودن بت دست داد، بشین به اشتباهات خودتم فکر کن؛ اگرم واقعا نمیتونی خطاهای خودتو ببینی و بهش فکر کنی، حتما با یه مشاور یا یه شخص آگاه و دانا صحبت کن تا یه نفر از بیرون ماجرا بت نشون بده خودتم چقدر خطا داشتی...
هیچ آدمی هرگز کاملاً معصوم و بدون اشتباه نبوده و نیست و نخواهد بود...
#مهردادبیدگلی
@critical_dialogue
من چو از خود وا شدم بر خویشتن افشا شدم؛
تا شناسم خویشتن را با خودم تنها شدم؛
خودشناسی کردهام تا خود شناسم خویش را،
در محک آوردمی، از حال خود جویا شدم...
🖊 ماشالله پور دامغان اعمی
@critical_dialogue
از عمد دیر پیام سین زدن و دیر جواب دادن یا جواب ندادن فقط از یک خودشیفتهی کمشعور برمیاد! وقتی کار خاصی و حساسی ندارید و پیامدهنده هم مزاحم نیست، اینکارها هیچ امتیاز و کلاسی براتون نداره، جز اینکه بیفرهنگی و کمشعوری خودتونو به نمایش میذارید و فکر میکنید مردُم نمیفهمن، درصورتی که آدمِ فهمیده خیلی زود متوجه میشه داستان از چه قراره و بدون اینکه توهین کنه یا حتی به روی مبارکتون بیاره میره و پشت سرشم نگاه نمی…
آن طفل یتیمام که ز بس بیکسم از باد
دریوزه کنم جنبش گهوارهی خود را؛
تا چون گل صدبرگ به سوی تو فرستم
از سینه برآرم دل صد پارهی خود را...
🖊 طالب آملی
@critical_dialogue
گیرم که به هر حال مرا بردهای از یاد؛
گیرم که زمان خاطرهها را به فنا داد؛
گیرم نه تو گفتی، نه شنیدی، نه تو بودی
آن عاشق دیوانه که صد نامه فرستاد؛
با آن همه دلبستگی و عشق چه کردی؟
یک بار دلت یاد من خسته نیفتاد؟
یعنی به همین راحتی از عشق گذشتی؟
یک ذره دلت تنگ نشد خانهات آباد؟
این بود جواب من دلخستهی عاشق؟
شیرین رقیبان شدهای از لج فرهاد؟
باشد، گلهای نیست، خدا پشت و پناهت؛
احوال خودت خوب، دمت گرم، دلت شاد.
👤 …
عشق راهی نیست کان را منزلی پیدا شود
این نه دریایی است کو را ساحلی پیدا شود
سالها باید چو مجنون پای در دامن کشید
تا ز دامانِ بیابان محملی پیدا شود
وحشتِ تنهایی از همصحبتِ بد خوشترست
سر به صحرا مینهم چون عاقلی پیدا شود
میتوانم سالها با دام و دد محشور بود
میخورم بر یکدگر چون جاهلی پیدا شود
نعل وارون و کلید فتح از یک آهن است
تن به طوفان میدهم تا ساحلی پیدا شود
گر کند غربال صد ره دورِ گردون خاک را
نیست ممکن ه…
👍1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @critical_dialogue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اخبار جذب هیات علمی و اساتید دانشگاه @heiatelmi · 44,960 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Critical Dialogues"” (@critical_dialogue), 1,372 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/critical_dialogue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.