📈 Bitcoin torna sopra gli 80.000$ 📈 Ethereum supera nuovamente i 2.450$ Il mercato crypto accelera dopo il calo delle aspettative su ulteriori rialzi dei tassi di interesse della Fed 🔥 Nelle ultime 60 minuti sono stati liquidati circa 86 milioni di dollari in posizioni short 👉 In parole semplici: molti trader stavano scommettendo sul ribasso del mercato, ma la salita improvvisa dei prezzi ha chiuso forzatamente le…

Channel
Criptovalute Canale Italiano
@criptovalutecanaleitaliano
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,128subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001372268697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @criptovalutecanaleitaliano |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/criptovalutecanaleitaliano |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 3,128 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 3,129 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 3,136 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 3,140 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:28 | 3,140 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 3,143 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 3,133 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 3,124 | +13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 3,111 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 3,106 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 3,105 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 3,110 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 3,113 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 3,112 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.3%
- avg views ÷ 3,128 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 479
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.414%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,744 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 89.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 BITCOIN: settembre sarà ancora una trappola? C’è un dato storico che sta facendo discutere gli investitori 👀 📊 Ogni volta che Bitcoin ha chiuso agosto in verde, settembre ha poi chiuso in rosso Una coincidenza? 🤔 O settembre potrebbe confermarsi ancora una volta uno dei mesi più difficili per Bitcoin? 📉 ⚠️ Naturalmente, il passato non garantisce il futuro. I mercati possono sempre sorprendere
📊 Cosa pensi che succederà?
- 🟢 Il minimo è già arrivato27%
- 🔴 Bitcoin deve ancora scendere50%
- 🟡 Il vecchio ciclo di 4 anni non funziona più26%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚨 ALTSEASON: MANCA UN SOLO SEGNALE Bitcoin Dominance è ancora alta Ma se iniziasse a rompere al ribasso? 👀 💥 ETH potrebbe prendere il comando 💰 La liquidità potrebbe spostarsi sulle altcoin 🚀 E l’Altseason potrebbe finalmente iniziare Occhi puntati sulla BTC Dominance
🚨 WARSH SPAVENTA I MERCATI 🇺🇸 Il presidente della Fed Kevin Warsh ha lanciato un messaggio molto più duro del previsto sull’inflazione Ha detto che: → L’inflazione è ancora troppo alta → Il target del 2% resta la priorità → La Fed potrebbe dover fare ancora qualcosa sui tassi 📊 E subito dopo il discorso, le probabilità di un rialzo dei tassi a settembre sono salite al 43% ⚠️ Per Bitcoin e soprattutto per le altco…
🚨 OGGI POTREBBE ESSERE UNA GIORNATA DECISIVA PER CRYPTO 🇺🇸 Il presidente della Fed Kevin Warsh parlerà oggi a Jackson Hole alle 16:00 italiane Il mercato guarda soprattutto a un punto: cosa dirà sui tassi e sull’inflazione? 📈 Tono dovish → possibile pump di BTC e altcoin 📉 Tono hawkish → possibile dump ⚠️ Aspettatevi volatilità elevata. Le parole di Warsh potrebbero influenzare il mercato non solo oggi, ma anche …
❤2
🚨 PCE USA PEGGIO DELLE ATTESE 🇺🇸 Il PCE è uscito al 3,7% contro il 3,6% previsto 📈 ⚠️ Cosa significa per il mercato? 👉 Inflazione più alta = meno spazio per una Fed “dovish” 👉 Possibile pressione su Bitcoin e crypto nel breve termine 👉 Il mercato potrebbe reagire con volatilità Ma attenzione: un singolo dato non determina il trend. Ora bisogna vedere come reagiscono BTC e gli altri asset nelle prossime ore 👀
👍2
🇺🇸 OGGI ARRIVA IL PCE USA: OCCHI SU BITCOIN! 👀 Alle 14:30 🇮🇹 verrà pubblicato il dato sull’inflazione PCE, uno degli indicatori più importanti per la Fed Le attese sono al 3,6% 📉 PCE sotto 3,6% → inflazione migliore del previsto → possibile 🚀 pump ➡️ PCE a 3,6% → dato in linea → il mercato potrebbe comunque reagire positivamente 📈 PCE sopra 3,6% → inflazione più alta del previsto → possibile 🔻 dump In pratica: …
⚡ TUTTO È CAMBIATO IN MENO DI UNA SETTIMANA Solo pochi giorni fa Bitcoin era intorno ai 62.000$ Oggi è sopra gli 80.000$ 🚀 📈 BTC: ~62K → 80,8K 📈 ETH: ~1.800$ → 2.500$ 📈 SOL: ~70-75$ → oltre 100$ E non è solo una questione di prezzi Le altcoin stanno iniziando a muoversi, le memecoin si stanno risvegliando e l’attività on-chain sta aumentando Il sentiment del mercato è cambiato completamente
❤2
🚨 BITCOIN, POLYMARKET VEDE UN NUOVO PUMP? 🚀 Secondo le quote di Polymarket, c’è ora il 53% di probabilità che Bitcoin chiuda il mese di agosto sopra gli $82.500 📈 La probabilità è salita rapidamente negli ultimi giorni, passando da livelli intorno al 30% fino all’attuale 53% Insomma, il mercato sta tornando decisamente più fiducioso sulla possibilità di vedere BTC sopra gli $82.500 entro fine agosto ⚠️ Ricordiamo…
❤2
🚨 BREAKING: BITCOIN A $79.000! 🇺🇸₿ Bitcoin torna a spingere e supera quota $79.000 Il catalizzatore? Il Tesoro USA starebbe valutando di utilizzare il Treasury General Account (TGA), che contiene circa $950 miliardi, per finanziare i riacquisti di Treasury a lunga scadenza ⚠️ Non significa che verrà utilizzato tutto il trilione Ma se una parte della liquidità del TGA venisse effettivamente immessa nel sistema, l’…
❤2
🚨 BITCOIN: ATTENZIONE AL RALLY ESTIVO Nel 2019 e nel 2022 Bitcoin fece un forte rally estivo, salvo poi invertire e segnare nuovi minimi nel Q4 Nel 2026 abbiamo già visto circa +28% Coincidenza? 👀 Non significa che debba ripetersi, ma una final flush è ancora possibile 📈 Prima un altro pump? 📉 O l’ultima scossa prima della vera ripartenza? #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @criptovalutecanaleitaliano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 Cosa pensi che succederà?
- 🟢 Il minimo è già arrivato27%
- 🔴 Bitcoin deve ancora scendere50%
- 🟡 Il vecchio ciclo di 4 anni non funziona più26%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 Secondo voi il minimo di Bitcoin è già stato toccato?
- 🟢 Sì, il minimo è fatto31%
- 🟡 Non ancora, vedremo nuovi minimi25%
- 🔴 Possibile altro dump prima della ripartenza47%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rfcofficialchannel · 28,641
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
@criptovalutait · 29,592
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Criptovalute Canale Italiano” (@criptovalutecanaleitaliano), 3,128 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criptovalutecanaleitaliano.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.