Channel
@cringeinbluelock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004446120470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cringeinbluelock |
| Description | идея была взята у @kringehoyo, не присваиваем её себе! бот для тейков: @cringebllkbot |
| First recorded | 12 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cringeinbluelock |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:22 | 102 | no change |
| 12 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 102 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 November 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,086 |
| Reactions total | 223 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
223 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424844428458110453 | 121 | 54.3% | |
| custom 5228951743181646089 | 28 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5361660430127245150 | 19 | 8.52% | |
| custom 5427309104030852708 | 14 | 6.28% | |
| 😨 | 13 | 5.83% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 5.38% | |
| custom 5424725651137538254 | 9 | 4.04% | |
| custom 5211163161167687445 | 5 | 2.24% | |
| custom 5447334462062889078 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| custom 5465288748210098133 | 1 | 0.448% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
дейлики, не указывающие кредиты ☠ какой от вас смысл тогда #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 542484442845811045317custom 52289517431816460893custom 54273091040308527083
Signed бот для тейков :)
🔤🔤🔤 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣‼️ 🤩 очень люблю вас, я не ожидал, что почти за неделю тут будет столько человек, я оч рад 🎁 может, давайте тейков?
❤5custom 52289517431816460895custom 53616604301272451505custom 54247256511375382542custom 54273091040308527082
Signed сайлес
вечный наплыв жён и фанаток популярных персов (они ларп) #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
❤1custom 54248444284581104531
Signed бот для тейков :)
эту песню и особенно аниматик к ней #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 54248444284581104534
Signed бот для тейков :)
гетслоп с анри #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 542484442845811045318
Signed бот для тейков :)
когда несса делают сабмиссивным заднеприводным рабом кайзера 🤮🤮 #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 542484442845811045315custom 52111631611676874453
Signed бот для тейков :)
листай листай я же урод
Signed ︎ ︎
тейки по типу сверху темы обсасывали миллионы раз, суть максимально очевидна и буквально нет таких людей, о которых говорят. типо 10% мб и говорят, а остальные 90% то и дело, что говорят, мол, ыыыы как же заебали ыыыы. это выглядит пиздец кринжово, тк такое говорят лишь бы поднять свою репутацию и получить похвалу, дабы обсосать свое раненное нежное эго #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 54248444284581104533
Signed бот для тейков :)
Люди, которые кричат что их пейринг "канон". Я если говорил что мой любимый шип это "канон", 100 проц шутил, потому что у меня мозгов хватает что бы понять, что блю лок не про любовь, а про спорт. Млм встретиться только в специальном аниме по типу "незнакоме на берегу моря" и тд. Но есть ёбанные фанаты Нагирео, которые после слов Канэсиро (вроде его) "Мне ваще похуй, хотите считайте их каноном, хотите просто друзьями…
custom 54248444284581104539
Signed бот для тейков :)
вечно конфликтные люди, которым футбол анимешный надоел и у них сгорает жопа от того, что происходит без их участия #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 53616604301272451505custom 52289517431816460892custom 54273091040308527082
Signed бот для тейков :)
в дополнение к предыдущему тейку – фемлок хуйня #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 542484442845811045315😨7
Signed бот для тейков :)
бля я оч люблю кайнессов,но как же я ненавижу арты где их рисуют как двух девушек☠☠ делают их двумя ебаными лесбухами,где в их паре несс конечно же с бидонамы до пола и волосами уебскими длинными,а кайзер маскулинная быдланка с накаченым тельцем #take 😻 @cringeinbluelock 🌺 🤩🤩 🤩 @cringebllkbot
custom 542484442845811045311😨6
Signed бот для тейков :)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cringeinbluelock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кринж в бллк фд это . . .” (@cringeinbluelock), 102 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cringeinbluelock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.